ivaldo
Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2012
- Messages
- 28,725
There are massive areas the EU can pass a law without a unanimous vote, 80+%It is. We have a veto, and we're about to set it on fire.
There are massive areas the EU can pass a law without a unanimous vote, 80+%It is. We have a veto, and we're about to set it on fire.
There are massive areas the EU can pass a law without a unanimous vote, 80+%
They need to be elected before it can be a democracy.Sounds like democracy to me.
You're telling me there is absolutely no instances whatsoever where the human rights laws are ineffective?Amazed anyone would question the EU on laws for human rights after everything amazing they have achieved in that field.
There are massive areas the EU can pass a law without a unanimous vote, 80+%
They need to be elected before it can be a democracy.
They need to be elected before it can be a democracy.
I laughed at this too. There are loads of easy targets to take issue with in terms of EU laws, ECHR is pretty awesome though.Amazed anyone would question the EU on laws for human rights after everything amazing they have achieved in that field.
And you'll have me beleive that having a free trade deal with the EU is unrealisticNo it shouldn't, it's a global World and each country affects all others. Some other countries should be telling to the US to grow up with it's gun law bullshit.
The sooner we start realising we share this World, the better we will be as a species.
And don't underestimate the veto in the case that something is hugely important to a country.
You're telling me there is absolutely no instances whatsoever where the human rights laws are ineffective?
It is really bizarre. It's like lies can be condoned if it gets you what you want, on the basis of 'well the remain camp told some porkies too'. 'Hey baby it's okay for me to lie to you, your ex lied to you too'.
It's not mutually exclusive, leavers should be infuriated that the leave campaign has gone back on two of it's three main selling points.
And you'll have me beleive that having a free trade deal with the EU is unrealistic
Again I'll pose the same question, do you beleive there are no areas in HR laws that are ridiculous? Unless your answer is no, you've chosen to be ignorant and refused to read what I read properly.I laughed at this too. There are loads of easy targets to take issue with in terms of EU laws, ECHR is pretty awesome though.
Again I'll pose the same question, do you beleive there are no areas in HR laws that are ridiculous? Unless your answer is no, you've chosen to be ignorant and refused to read what I read properly.
Really? Having the world agree to share it is hardly realistic.Not sure of your point here?
It's almost as if I'm deliberately being difficult and reading my own agenda into your posts...Again I'll pose the same question, do you beleive there are no areas in HR laws that are ridiculous? Unless your answer is no, you've chosen to be ignorant and refused to read what I read properly.
Again I'll pose the same question, do you beleive there are no areas in HR laws that are ridiculous? Unless your answer is no, you've chosen to be ignorant and refused to read what I read properly.
Terror deportation lawsExamples of the ones you don't like?
After those Boris comments I'm sure this won't happen now. It just can't!
Terror deportation laws.Please give us an example.
Terror deportation laws
Let's just wait and seeSadly it will.
So you disagree then? Brilliant.Knew this was coming, cause you heard the "hook" story innit. Hilarious.
So you disagree then? Brilliant.
Am I to beleive none of you have ever heard of intentional spoiling of a ballot?
After unwittingly stating your beleive that freedom of movement was a bad thing, then trying to amend that by throwing petty insults then that very much makes sense.It's almost as if I'm deliberately being difficult and reading my own agenda into your posts...
And to answer, no, there isn't one I'd object to in the overall scheme of things.
I know it is, but my partner had already voted and didn't know if she made the right decision.What you're talking about isn't spoiling a ballot (or two, as it were): You've both cast legitimate votes. A spoiled ballot is counted and registered as such, which gives it some significance – at least potentially. What you've done, on the other hand, seems like a complete waste of time.
So it's bullshit lie then?Break down the law ivaldo and tell me which part you don't like, rather than believing another bullshit leave campaign lie. We'll see then if you even agree yourself.
You're not answering the question. Which part of the law would you change and how would it be for the better? Please note, saying "let us deport terrorists" is an invalid answer as it's not an explanation.So it's bullshit lie then?
Wow.
So it's bullshit lie then?
Wow.
Terror deportation laws.
Ffs... Further proof of why this should have been decided by parliament.I know it is, but my partner had already voted and didn't know if she made the right decision.
We do know that the FTSE 100 has taken Brexit in its stride. The people who bet their money on the future of the British economy don't seem too worried. If you look at its performance over a 1 month or 3 month period you'd never know that Brexit had occurred.
Ah here we go, the 'resite the law' part of the argument.You're not answering the question. Which part of the law would you change and how would it be for the better? Please note, saying "let us deport terrorists" is an invalid answer as it's not an explanation.
I know it is, but my partner had already voted and didn't know if she made the right decision.
*Applause*If anyone wanted to watch that question time, my review of it would be: waste of time