Sparky_Hughes
I am Shitbeard.
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2008
- Messages
- 17,556
That's the key word, we need a party based on common sense and decency!!Sounds too much like common sense too me. Tut tut.
That's the key word, we need a party based on common sense and decency!!Sounds too much like common sense too me. Tut tut.
Sorry for my ignorance but what does that delay now mean?
It's about time for a change, no more of these assholes who role out of university, into some cushy little research job mummy.or daddy sorted for them then into politics
The people running the country should have actually done something in life. Worked their way up a career ladder not involved in politics, run a business (not just sat on the board of directors)
Put a former doctor in charge of the NHS, an account in charge of the excheqor etc. And send these inbred halfwits back to their country estates out of the way. Or give them a nice wall to lean against, a cigarette and a blindfold.
It's such a shame that Benn's amendment lost so narrowly. That would have taken the impetus right away from yet another presentation of May's deal. We might have actually seem some effective cross-party working, rather than in-party wrecking.
What would actually happen if Benns amendment passed?
Not really. I am not brilliant at politics. Are we coming out or staying in?
I've tried to imagine how Benn's amendment would have worked as well. I'm guessing any member could put forward a motion, but then the speaker would decide which to proceed with. Wow, the speaker would have a hell of a lot of power there. Know I might be wrong though.Usually the government sets the motions and business off the house, the amendment would have allowed ministers of any party to table a motion to be voted on e.g norway +, second ref or whatever.
It's why calls from the gov and commentators for MPs to input and do more is just guff. They simply can't unless the government provide the time for them to do so and they refuse to.
I think ordinarily preference is given to the following criteriaI've tried to imagine how Benn's amendment would have worked as well. I'm guessing any member could put forward a motion, but then the speaker would decide which to proceed with. Wow, the speaker would have a hell of a lot of power there. Know I might be wrong though.
Gwynne's Twitter says he was paired, as it happens. I'm surprised it didn't get a majority- it sends a poor message outwith the UK about MPs' willingness to work co-operatively in this situation.The closeness of the Benn vote is even more galling when you look deeper, one abstention was from Jared O'Mara (suspended from Labour, took Clegg's seat in 2017, who would've been for), another from Andrew Gwynne (who couldn't vote due to a family emergency, for which proxy votes aren't allowed) and another from Fiona Onasanya (nuff said).
Indeed loose meaningful vote 3 next week... Off to see the EU leaders on Wednesday / Thursday.Gwynne's Twitter says he was paired, as it happens. I'm surprised it didn't get a majority- it sends a poor message outwith the UK about MPs' willingness to work co-operatively in this situation.
We all know what Mrs May intends to do, she's banking on getting her way at the very last moment. It's like some awful game of chicken.
Absolutely, bunch of lazy arrogant entitled elitist crusty out of touch delusional pricks who think they are our rulers rather than our servants.I've been saying this for a while. Career politicians needs to stop.
Indeed loose meaningful vote 3 next week... Off to see the EU leaders on Wednesday / Thursday.
Offer / threaten a long extension and on Friday announce meaningful vote 4... Probably Wednesday night... Something like 40 hours before no deal happens by default
To be fair it's her only hope of getting her deal through and it might happen
The closeness of the Benn vote is even more galling when you look deeper, one abstention was from Jared O'Mara (suspended from Labour, took Clegg's seat in 2017, who would've been for), another from Andrew Gwynne (who couldn't vote due to a family emergency, for which proxy votes aren't allowed) and another from Fiona Onasanya (nuff said).
That's the key word, we need a party based on common sense and decency!!
Gwynne's Twitter says he was paired, as it happens. I'm surprised it didn't get a majority- it sends a poor message outwith the UK about MPs' willingness to work co-operatively in this situation.
We all know what Mrs May intends to do, she's banking on getting her way at the very last moment. It's like some awful game of chicken.
Dont they just grant an extension anyway, in the end, because of the carnage no deal Brexit unleashes in Northern Ireland?This is the main point, the UK parliament are showing no signs of coming together to have a single goal.
May is still determined to get her deal through.
ERG & DUP desperately want no deal.
Corbyn stands up and repeats his unicorn address which everyone , apart from his disciples, knows is impossible.
Until parliament stops playing party politics I don't see how the EU will unanimously grant an extension.
I'm sure they think the outside world can't see what they are doing.
true... My gut feel is he will allow 3 based upon no deal now being against the express wishes of the house (material change in circumstances)Still no assurance that Bercow will allow MV3 let alone 4.
This is the main point, the UK parliament are showing no signs of coming together to have a single goal.
May is still determined to get her deal through.
ERG & DUP desperately want no deal.
Corbyn stands up and repeats his unicorn address which everyone , apart from his disciples, knows is impossible.
Until parliament stops playing party politics I don't see how the EU will unanimously grant an extension.
I'm sure they think the outside world can't see what they are doing.
Dont they just grant an extension anyway, in the end, because of the carnage no deal Brexit unleashes in Northern Ireland?
I mean, not saying "The EU wants a deal as much as we did, they will blink first" or anything. Of course, if it is going to be a no deal then it is going to be a no deal, the EU will not back down. But while the UK is still ostensibly looking for a solution I think the EU's reserves of patience will prove pretty deep, because they, and particularly RoI, genuinely dont want that Pandora's Box being opened.
He might if more labour MPs threaten to defect. He is demuring again now that the threat of defections appears to have died.true... My gut feel is he will allow 3 based upon no deal now being against the express wishes of the house (material change in circumstances)
My gut feel is he will also allow MV4 as we will be less than 48 hours from a no deal with no clue as to what to do
But as you say he might not - plus i suspect people will throw a plethora of amendments at both stages and again it will be at his discretion which ones go forwards to a vote.
Would be interesting if they finally tagged on the amendment with the aproval referendum (mays deal or remain) and if labour would finally back it then it could force the pm to the eu leaders the next day with a way to get her deal passed but subject to an approval long enough to allow for the referendum - would leave the problem of EU elections but I guess they can fudge that somehow?
that said im not sure if Corbyn will ever formally back the referendum vote but you would have to assume that MV3 could well be the last time to do so and it could well be now or never
IMO the EU has to be the grown up in the room and cancel its own WA saying; "No extension, Leave with No Deal or withdraw your A50 application" and decide before the 29th March. There could be one final vote on this in the HoP, a free vote for all MP's (one thing May and Corbyn might agree on) and then MP's encouraged to vote as their constituencies did, or according to their personal beliefs and be prepared to live with the consequences.
I understand what you mean too. As you say, at some point someone has to pronounce this process dead, at some point someone draws a line. And with the 27 needing unanimity there is a significant risk that moment comes now. But I just feel solidarity with Ireland will win the day at this stage and we'll get some kind of extension. If for no other reason than they arent particularly prepared for no deal either and they can use a short extension to make final preparations their end - particularly for RoI. I mean, if we crash out we need a hard border in Ireland in two weeks, right? Surely some preparation is needed to get that infrastructure in place?I understand what you mean but I think the patience has been running thin for quite a while and at the end of the day everyone has to move on.
It is possible that this uncertainty could go on for years and there has to be a cut-off point somewhere.
How much patience have they got.
In some ways the uncertainty is worse than no deal and they're looking forward to progressing, rather than have this hanging over them indefinitely.
That would achieve nothing more than to ensure we left with no deal, and to cause a huge drop in British public support towards the EU. Not to mention vindicate all the leavers who have claimed the EU conducted its business via bullying individual states.
What the majority of MPs wanting to remain... how do you get to that conclusion?
I understand what you mean too. As you say, at some point someone has to pronounce this process dead, at some point someone draws a line. And with the 27 needing unanimity there is a significant risk that moment comes now. But I just feel solidarity with Ireland will win the day at this stage and we'll get some kind of extension. If for no other reason than they arent particularly prepared for no deal either and they can use a short extension to make final preparations their end - particularly for RoI. I mean, if we crash out we need a hard border in Ireland in two weeks, right? Surely some preparation is needed to get that infrastructure in place?
Would be too absurd if we ended up with a border in the Irish Sea, after we spent the last year tying ourselves in knots by refusing to accept that very outcome.A short extension seems more likely than a long one but there is also the responsibility of the signatories of the GFA to uphold it whether there is a deal or not. This has to be resolved whatever happens. Possibly some kind of border in the Irish Sea? There has to be an answer eventually.
Because it would be seen as blackmail, it would cause a massive public opinion shift, and MP's are nothing if not extremely attuned to political wind changes. The only reason we're in the chaos we are now is because the public are just as divided as the politicians.
I don't think the DUP want a hard border. It'll trigger a border poll with the republicans more determined than ever to get their united Ireland. Couple that with the Unionists who would splinter off and vote to remain in the EU after seeing their opinions ignored by the DUP themselves so it's only one side of that vote that would have a sizeable percentage of their voters be potentially undecided.This is the main point, the UK parliament are showing no signs of coming together to have a single goal.
May is still determined to get her deal through.
ERG & DUP desperately want no deal.
Corbyn stands up and repeats his unicorn address which everyone , apart from his disciples, knows is impossible.
Until parliament stops playing party politics I don't see how the EU will unanimously grant an extension.
I'm sure they think the outside world can't see what they are doing.
A short extension seems more likely than a long one but there is also the responsibility of the signatories of the GFA to uphold it whether there is a deal or not. This has to be resolved whatever happens. Possibly some kind of border in the Irish Sea? There has to be an answer eventually.
Would be too absurd if we ended up with a border in the Irish Sea, after we spent the last year tying ourselves in knots by refusing to accept that very outcome.
I remember saying the same thing a few weeks back, I think someone said I probably underestimated how much English MPs would resist that outcome. But yes, it has seemed like the only realistic way forward right from the beginning.Agreed but does May now need the DUP or care about them any longer, if she hadn't had the disastrous 2017 GE result I bet this wouldn't have been a problem.