Cassidy
No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2013
- Messages
- 32,941
Pretty muchUnited set a dangerous prescient. Now they’ll have to give him the Greenwood treatment.
Pretty muchUnited set a dangerous prescient. Now they’ll have to give him the Greenwood treatment.
Maybe not so much on the pitch, but it's more noise, controversy and disruption when surely what we need now is a period of calm to sort things out. ETH must be pulling Schteve's hair out.This isn’t a loss tbf, a benefit if anything.
I don’t really have sympathy for the manager on this one because he brought this clown to the club.Maybe not so much on the pitch, but it's more noise, controversy and disruption when surely what we need now is a period of calm to sort things out. ETH must be pulling Schteve's hair out.
If hes being investigated by Manchester police if he gets charged he’ll get suspended.If the translations I saw are correct, there is nothing leaked that implicates him in violence against the girl. He apologized for cursing and breaking stuff. The leaked pictures can't be even remotely considered as evidence of something. I accidentally banged my head on the door the other day and have a worse wound that being shown..
For now at least, there is no reason for him to be suspended, dropped or anything like that.
Greenwood was arrested the day it all broke on social media iirc so I'm pretty sure it was then.At what point was Greenwood suspended. Was it when he was arrested or charged?
He was suspended before he was arrested.Greenwood was arrested the day it all broke on social media iirc so I'm pretty sure it was then.
The club doctor treated her - that was the story when it broke 4 months ago.So it's begun huh. His mother seems to be the only witness though
United set a dangerous prescient. Now they’ll have to give him the Greenwood treatment.
He was suspended before he was arrested.
Fergie sold our soul to the Glazers morelike...The club has been going downhill since 2005There's gonna be huge pressure to suspend now. His going public with a denial won't change that - the Greenwood precedent can't be seen to not apply here. What a fecking mess (and what a **** if true) again. Serious question - Are we cursed? Did someone sell our souls to the devil for the Fergie years?
In this case I suspect they'll be inclined to say that, pending further developments, he will continue to play. I think I'm right in saying that's what more usually happens when these sort of accusations emerge about a player.
The Greenwood situation was extremely atypical due to audio of an apparent assault being made public. I wouldn't take that situation as the template for how our club will behave.
Maybe not so much on the pitch, but it's more noise, controversy and disruption when surely what we need now is a period of calm to sort things out. ETH must be pulling Schteve's hair out.
Yeah it was all on the Sunday.If I recall it correctly every happened on the same day or at least within 24 hours.
No he's not. Footballers literally get away with murder. There are 2nd and 3re and 4th and 5th chances. No one is done, at least at a professional level unless they go to prison that goes beyond their playing career.He's fecking done if even a quarter of the shit she is saying turns out to be accurate.
The club should absolutely not suspend a player based on accusations alone. Antony came out with a statement that accusations are false. He needs at the very least to have an opportunity to show his side of the story. If following investigation Antony is charged, the club should then consider suspension.I think you are right on what would normally happen, it has at other clubs. However with the Greenwood issue being so recent, and with so much blood still in the water so to speak with regards to the club handling of it, the sharks will be circling wanting to bite at any opportunity again (just a metaphor, not criticising anyone). The safest move right now PR wise would be to suspend. Maybe that's not correct from a perspective of backing the player and had Greenwood not happened I think you would be correct, but now? It's very tricky. If further evidence comes out then for sure he's cooked until the investigations are over.
I think the done is probably in relation to his career at United. If even one of the accusations of violence can be backed by an audio or any proof, he's done here.No he's not. Footballers literally get away with murder. There are 2nd and 3re and 4th and 5th chances. No one is done, at least at a professional level unless they go to prison that goes beyond their playing career.
Manchester. A City United.Pellistri Hojlund, cut backs, byline, goals.
Even then I'm not sure. The precedent was set when audio of sexual violence in the act was deemed redeemable. When it's physical violence it's not seen the same way. We've got NFL owners. A guy in the NFL knocked his wife out on camera in an elevator and dragged her away by her hair and he came back. An inside suspension maybe but I can definitely see him come back when the public evidence is as vague as they are now at the moment.I think the done is probably in relation to his career at United. If even one of the accusations of violence can be backed by an audio or any proof, he's done here.
He won’t be suspended unless he’s charged would be my assumption. If he is suspended then Mount will still play right ahead of Sancho.Even then I'm not sure. The precedent was set when audio of sexual violence in the act was deemed redeemable. When it's physical violence it's not seen the same way. We've got NFL owners. A guy in the NFL knocked his wife out on camera in an elevator and dragged her away by her hair and he came back. An inside suspension maybe but I can definitely see him come back when the public evidence is as vague as they are now at the moment.
Club has responsibility to uphold the same standard as in case with Greenwood. There are differences in circumstances of public evidence but it's following the exact same trajectory.
At what point was Greenwood suspended. Was it when he was arrested or charged?
Which if he is charged I'd expect them to do. I see no grounds for suspension yet.
Club has responsibility to uphold the same standard as in case with Greenwood. There are differences in circumstances of public evidence but it's following the exact same trajectory.
Before any of that.
He was suspended the day accusations came out on 30th Jan 2022. He was arrested on 1st Feb and released on bail on 2nd Feb.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/mason-greenwood-suspended-man-utd-26089309
Surely we now have to do the same with Antony or we will be showing a massive double standard?
Greenwood was suspended before he was even arrested let alone charged.
Oh I agree in normal circumstances, 100%. If I had been accused by one of a myriad of ex lovers I would expect my employer to back me up until the charges were made at the very least. Unfortunately though life is not so binary as what is right and wrong. There are other pressures here. If my employer had been recently dragged through the mud due to their handling of a similar case and were desperate to get some image back I can certainly see how they might put that first and play it safe. It's always shades of grey. Would suck for me, but I would understand it.The club should absolutely not suspend a player based on accusations alone. Antony came out with a statement that accusations are false. He needs at the very least to have an opportunity to show his side of the story. If following investigation Antony is charged, the club should then consider suspension.
Yes that is a very fair point.if only he could deliver on the end product id be very happy with him. Just seems to not have that final play n him yet. Hopefully he works on it and starts to click. Will hold out hope until i see him with a proper CF at least.
Wasn’t Nicky Butt accused of domestic abuse whilst at the club a few years back? I don’t think he was suspended. Granted he was a staff member but you’d expect the same employee rights to apply.Nah, that’s not true. Every case has to be treated on its own merits. And there were exceptional circumstances in the Greenwood case that don’t apply here. A closer analogy would probably be when Jonny Evans was accused of rape. The club waited for the CPS to give an opinion before making a decision about whether or not to take action against the player. I expect the same will happen here.
Club has responsibility to uphold the same standard as in case with Greenwood. There are differences in circumstances of public evidence but it's following the exact same trajectory.
Nope. For obvious reasons. The circumstances are very different here.
Wasn’t Nicky Butt accused of domestic abuse whilst at the club a few years back? I don’t think he was suspended. Granted he was a staff member but you’d expect the same employee rights to apply.
Even then I'm not sure. The precedent was set when audio of sexual violence in the act was deemed redeemable. When it's physical violence it's not seen the same way. We've got NFL owners. A guy in the NFL knocked his wife out on camera in an elevator and dragged her away by her hair and he came back. An inside suspension maybe but I can definitely see him come back when the public evidence is as vague as they are now at the moment.