Teja
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2014
- Messages
- 6,943
I only watched the last 15-20 mins and thought he was alright. Had a decent shot saved and a few good passes. What's the issue?
Shite decision making, always shooting instead of passing when he can't shoot, doing his backheel behind the other foot touch for a crossfield pass (which he fecks up and slows down the play), floating shot after shot over the net, more interested in megging somebody than doing something with the ball.I only watched the last 15-20 mins and thought he was alright. Had a decent shot saved and a few good passes. What's the issue?
I only watched the last 15-20 mins and thought he was alright. Had a decent shot saved and a few good passes. What's the issue?
The shots are getting annoying, EtH needs to do something with that.I only watched the last 15-20 mins and thought he was alright. Had a decent shot saved and a few good passes. What's the issue?
Should have scored double the goals he did last season. However some of the goals he did score, no one else in the squad scores them.If he could sort his finishing he’d score a silly amount of goals.
Frustrating.
The most over-hated United player since Fellaini. I like him, he's by far our most industrious and inventive attacking player.
Imagine if Fellaini cost that muchThe most over-hated United player since Fellaini. I like him, he's by far our most industrious and inventive attacking player.
Doesn't seem like he has worked on his right foot at all which if he could do would improve him from good to very good.
The only thing he invents is more ways of shooting the ball off target.The most over-hated United player since Fellaini. I like him, he's by far our most industrious and inventive attacking player.
Baffles me how a person who has spent years training almost every day at kicking a ball, can be so bad at kicking a ball. I can't think of any other profession or skill where you could spend that long practising and still not be very good at it.
You hit the nail on the head. I bolded the most interesting parts that I 100% agree with.This is pretty much my issue with Antony. In my opinion he settled really well, he's come to the PL and doesn't look like he's struggling with the intensity or pace in the way Sancho or VDB have.
He doesn't look a shell of himself. I didn't see much of him at Ajax but from the little I did see he looks the same player for us as he does with the Brazil NT, this is just what he is. Of course there is adjusted difficulty in PL.
The thing about potential is it needs to be shown before I can believe in it. Garnacho gives me belief he can be a good finisher because of the variety in his goals with both feet for example. I have zero faith in Antony being a good finisher as he seems to only be able to shoot in one way and unlike Robben he's not anywhere near as good at it.
His creativity is the one area where most of my frustration is centred when it comes to Antony. Take away his decision making and its still an ability issue. He cannot cross at all, he probably put in less than 5 good crosses all of last season. He is where counter attacks go to die, whenever we're on the break and the ball goes to Antony, I'm expecting him to do something that reduces the possibility of a goal scoring opportunity. Lastly his inability to see the open man and shoot on goal has led to so many potential chances being squandered. Even when he sees the pass its often over or underhit which messes up the chance.
I never usually jump all the way out the window on our players. Even those that I'm not necessarily a fan of I recognise their value to the team. In my opinion I've seen enough to say he's not good enough and never will be. I could be wrong but I doubt it.
You are correct BUT - the problem with Antony is he lacks the basic skills that can't be thought when you're a senior player (I don't get the idea that some people consider him a youngster that still has time to work on his weak foot). He isn't going to magically turn this around. His passing looks way off and his long range efforts look good only because of high volume of shots. His finishing of easy chances is atracious. That's the harsh truth about Antony. Like El Jefe mentioned in the comment above, he adapted very well to the league, he also adapted extremely well to his limitations. But those limitations are glaring and I believe it's not fair to expect from him to get over it. That's a huge task.There’s so much missing from this post. Firstly Antony is 23. Do you know how much footballers can potentially I prove between 23 and 25? It’s a staggering amount. It’s typically the age range where good footballers tend to put it all together. The players who are world class by 22 are the exception, not the rule. None of this is to say Antony will completely figure it out or become world class, but it’s an essential data point to counterbalance your reactionary position. Cristiano exploded between 22 and 24. Scholes and Iniesta didn’t become first team regulars, as in nailed on starters, until they were 22/23 and really started to excel at 24/25. History is full of them.
Secondly Antony has had one season, in a new league and a new country, at a higher level than he’s used to. We’ve also, thirdly, spent nearly 90m on him. All of that is to say that it would make sense to see how he develops and performs over a second season before declaring him shit or not good enough. History is littered with people writing off young players, only to end up with serious egg on their face. The movement to sell Rashford or release him on a free just 12-18 months ago is a beautiful case study in fan stupidity.
So my advice to you is to just chill out.
What do you mean by "inventive"? He's the most predictable player we have. Cut inside, shoot a curler.The most over-hated United player since Fellaini. I like him, he's by far our most industrious and inventive attacking player.
He actually is a bizarre example of a player that looks fantastic on the ball until he kicks it. His close control and space awareness on the sideline is unmatched in our team. The way he cuts inside also looks cool and is quite effective to lose the opposition.Baffles me how a person who has spent years training almost every day at kicking a ball, can be so bad at kicking a ball. I can't think of any other profession or skill where you could spend that long practising and still not be very good at it.
You hit the nail on the head. I bolded the most interesting parts that I 100% agree with.
You are correct BUT - the problem with Antony is he lacks the basic skills that can't be thought when you're a senior player (I don't get the idea that some people consider him a youngster that still has time to work on his weak foot). He isn't going to magically turn this around. His passing looks way off and his long range efforts look good only because of high volume of shots. His finishing of easy chances is atracious. That's the harsh truth about Antony. Like El Jefe mentioned in the comment above, he adapted very well to the league, he also adapted extremely well to his limitations. But those limitations are glaring and I believe it's not fair to expect from him to get over it. That's a huge task.
He will improve his decision making but I'd argue his decisions is also driven by his limitation. A very simple example is he doesn't trust his passing, therefore he always goes for a shot. Might sound ridiculous, but not so much when you actually see his passing.
What do you mean by "inventive"? He's the most predictable player we have. Cut inside, shoot a curler.
He actually is a bizarre example of a player that looks fantastic on the ball until he kicks it. His close control and space awareness on the sideline is unmatched in our team. The way he cuts inside also looks cool and is quite effective to lose the opposition.
I don't see that hapenning. His shooting doesn't look anything special and is very far off from being "clinical on his stronger foot". IMO that is just as likely as significantly improving on a weaker foot. Can this be done? Yes. Does it happen often? Not at all.The problem is not that Antony doesn’t have the basic skill like for example taking players on from the outside or using his weaker foot.
Antony doesn’t need to improve on all that - all he needs to improve on is his shooting ability on his stronger foot because he gets plenty of chances.
If he literally perfects that ability to be more clinical on his stronger foot - I don’t see why he couldn’t score a goal every two games or even more because he has/creates plenty of this chance.
I know football doesn’t exactly work that simple, but I still don’t see why it’s exactly impossible either.
He improves his shooting and he starts becoming a better goal scorer for us because he gets in to dangerous positions quite easily by himself even with fullbacks like Dalot & Wan Bissaka.
I think he's got more chance of delivering this season or next than the likes of Sancho have.He'll need to deliver this season, it won't be pretty for him otherwise.
Cristiano used to shoot like shit between 18-20 but you started seeing the improvement once he was 21 and by the time he was Antony's age he was elite at it.Moaners here would do well to remember that Fergie used to value CR7 high shot output even though wasteful a lot. He knew his finishing would improve over time and then goals will come. It used to frustrate fans no end but the worlds best ever manager knew differently.
There’s so much missing from this post. Firstly Antony is 23. Do you know how much footballers can potentially I prove between 23 and 25? It’s a staggering amount. It’s typically the age range where good footballers tend to put it all together. The players who are world class by 22 are the exception, not the rule. None of this is to say Antony will completely figure it out or become world class, but it’s an essential data point to counterbalance your reactionary position. Cristiano exploded between 22 and 24. Scholes and Iniesta didn’t become first team regulars, as in nailed on starters, until they were 22/23 and really started to excel at 24/25. History is full of them.
Secondly Antony has had one season, in a new league and a new country, at a higher level than he’s used to. We’ve also, thirdly, spent nearly 90m on him. All of that is to say that it would make sense to see how he develops and performs over a second season before declaring him shit or not good enough. History is littered with people writing off young players, only to end up with serious egg on their face. The movement to sell Rashford or release him on a free just 12-18 months ago is a beautiful case study in fan stupidity.
So my advice to you is to just chill out.