He’s so crap.Caf logic
He’s so crap.Caf logic
Half of those have literally nothing to do with him.
Agreed. But if their best is poor, then that's not good.Your keeper is there for when the defence messes up, their job is to do their best in that situation.
1% chance to save but should do better. That's harsh.File that one under “should do better” again.
Probably a 1% chance he could save it, but yet again doing everything wrong technically again. Rooted to his line and guessing. Goalscorer didn’t even look up to give him the eyes, just a blatant guess.
Decent on the ball again. Going nowhere with him long term
1% chance to save but should do better. That's harsh.
did you read my post? Technically he was poor again, so yes he should do better. You can do everything right and still concede. At which point you say there was nothing more to be done. That is not the case here, again
Talking about GK basics and then writing that.File that one under “should do better” again.
Probably a 1% chance he could save it, but yet again doing everything wrong technically again. Rooted to his line and guessing. Goalscorer didn’t even look up to give him the eyes, just a blatant guess.
Decent on the ball again. Going nowhere with him long term
It’s like we signed a completely different player to the one that played not long ago in the Cl finalNice job in CL. Worth every euro.
It was an observation/expression as to how unlikely it is to be saved in that scenario. You know it was, it’s evidently not an XGS calculation is it. Stop being silly.so if he did all them things better it should surely be higher than 1%?
Where in the goalkeeping fundamentals does it say you should guess?Talking about GK basics and then writing that.
He's one on one about 5 metres away, of course he's going to guess a side.
If you want to slate him pick the moments where he literally cost us the group.
What is there a manual you're reading from?Where in the goalkeeping fundamentals does it say you should guess?
Of course it’s possible to simultaneously believe that:
1) he probably would have never saved that regardless.
2) it was truly bizarre decision-making to stay on his line, and he should have rushed out and given himself a small chance of saving it.
I'm not pretending that he's the only keeper making mistakes, but that's a pretty ridiculous roll-call of soft-to-catastrophic goals in a half season of football. And unlike most Youtube comps, which are about players we're trying to learn more about (ie. we haven't seen them actually play,) we've seen Onana, so we know that he hasn't been making up for it with other qualities (ie. his distribution.) Disasterous signing whom we can only hope will start to perform a dramatic u-turn in performances.Of course it’s heavily edited. It’s the equivalent of a season summary for a striker showing only the shots they put wide. Haaland would look like a pub footballer if someone ever made that edit.
Showing a compilation of shots flying past a goalkeeper makes any keeper look bad. As they look incapable of saving the football. Throw in some legitimate howlers and a few saves where he could have done better and it’s a train wreck. And let’s not pretend he’s the only keeper who’s let in soft goals this season.
He may or may not be good enough for us. He’s had a poor start to his United career. But a compilation like that is a dog shit way to analyse any goalkeeper.
Dunno about that. It kinda reminded me of myself actually.Not even amateur keepers stay rooted to their line like he did tonight. Woeful goalkeeping.
I'm not pretending that he's the only keeper making mistakes, but that's a pretty ridiculous roll-call of soft-to-catastrophic goals in a half season of football. And unlike most Youtube comps, which are about players we're trying to learn more about (ie. we haven't seen them actually play,) we've seen Onana, so we know that he hasn't been making up for it with other qualities (ie. his distribution.) Disasterous signing whom we can only hope will start to perform a dramatic u-turn in performances.