Starting to think hes better as a wingback. Gets the ball more and in more space to run with it
We’ve only beat Everton with him playing as a wing back. What’s your point?And we have lost 3 since, which include a 0-3 defeat at home to Bournemouth and a 2-0 defeat at a team in the relegation mix.
When did I say he is a problem?We’ve only beat Everton with him playing as a wing back. What’s your point?
Amad as a 10 is the least of our problems.
When did I say he is a problem?
I said, we need to play him a RWB as playing both Maz and Dalot as WB's makes us more defensive. We lose an attacking player from the XI and those two hardly have any attacking output.
Phrase your point a bit better then if that’s what you meant. You’ve said we’re ruining a good thing by playing him as a 10.Way to ruin a good thing by playing him as a #10.
Did you come into the thread looking to jump on posts? Jesus Christ!Phrase your point a bit better then if that’s what you meant. You’ve said we’re ruining a good thing by playing him as a 10.
YesDid you come into the thread looking to jump on posts? Jesus Christ!
Yes, we looked like we were building some kind of decent attacking unit with Amad playing almost as a RW at RWB. Now we have ruined it by playing two defensive players at both wingback positions by moving him at #10. Better?
I think you got it wrong @Valencia Shin Crosses
We look better with Amad in the wing back role in my opinion.
As a 10, Amad needs to be in a side that understands patterns, and that can play technical balls into the right spaces. That’s why he doesn’t shine as much in the AM role. But as a RWB, he gets more room to operate.He doesn’t look as good in the 10 position in this formation.