Annoying that we cant rely on Garnacho/Rashford when he’s man marked. Squad needs quality.
16
Season Average Rating
- Appearances
- 27
- Goals
- 5
- Assists
- 7
- Yellow cards
- 1
He's better at wingback but it might not be specifically because of him, but because Maz is terrible at wingback. Doesn't make the right runs to create space and doesn't maintain width. As of right now, I'd keep Maz at RCB and Amad at RWB. Both will be better for it.
If we have to play Amad at #10, Dalot is the least worst option for RCB (creates space, makes runs, will actually cross when he's on his right foot vs the thing he does on the left)
Quite simple, if our only attacking danger comes from Diallo, managers are going to nullify him and be happy we are forced to attack down the other wing. It's not Diallos fault, he's not Messi by any standard, he's just let down by the rest of the quality in the side.
We’ve only beat Everton with him playing as a wing back. What’s your point?
Amad as a 10 is the least of our problems.
Wasn’t coming off for him today, but at least you can see him trying. Faint praise, but still
When did I say he is a problem?
I said, we need to play him a RWB as playing both Maz and Dalot as WB's makes us more defensive. We lose an attacking player from the XI and those two hardly have any attacking output.
Phrase your point a bit better then if that’s what you meant. You’ve said we’re ruining a good thing by playing him as a 10.
Did you come into the thread looking to jump on posts? Jesus Christ!
Yes, we looked like we were building some kind of decent attacking unit with Amad playing almost as a RW at RWB. Now we have ruined it by playing two defensive players at both wingback positions by moving him at #10. Better?
Yes
One of the few shining lights of this season, but a real stretch to rely on him as our main attacking threat
I think you got it wrong @Valencia Shin Crosses
We look better with Amad in the wing back role in my opinion.
We look better with Amad in the wing back role in my opinion.
Maybe, but I also think teams are clearly adjusting the defense to his side of the pitch and ensuring he doesn’t get many 1v1s and instead daring Dalot/Bruno to do something on the opposite side because they know neither are going to be a threat in space to take on a defender.
Maz has also been disappointing in that WB role behind him.
Would like to see either Antony/Garnacho get a spot in one of the two WB roles to give us some sort of attacking support. We look completely toothless right now.
Not good enough today. He needs to be consistent in this high level.
He does not have the first yard pace and is extremely weak. The biggest issue for me is his decision making is poor. It doesn’t help that Garnacho also has low IQ.
He does not have the first yard pace and is extremely weak. The biggest issue for me is his decision making is poor. It doesn’t help that Garnacho also has low IQ.
He doesn’t look as good in the 10 position in this formation.
As a 10, Amad needs to be in a side that understands patterns, and that can play technical balls into the right spaces. That’s why he doesn’t shine as much in the AM role. But as a RWB, he gets more room to operate.
I think his future is at attacking mid, potentially when we have the right players around him. But for now let’s keep him at RWB.
Can he speak to other clubs from the 1st Jan? What a shambles we are in when our only attacker worth keeping could be off. Its the sort of situation we end up in then give the player a huge contract
We have a year option, don't we?
feck I’m getting sick of people throwing out this IQ line when somebody has a bad game, especially against someone like Amad, who has mostly displayed very good decision making on the pitch.
The boss hasn't played Amad at RWB for a while now. Is he likely to put him back in that position?
It's forever the problem at United, the manager can only ever rely on 1 maybe 2 players having any sort of form at the same time.
The rest are either in the worst form of their lives, injured or off doing interviews and posting tweets.
so true.19/20 was probably the last time. Rashford, Martial, Greenwood all got comfortable double digit G/As with Fernandes not far behind.
I don’t think he looks particularly good in the 10 role.
Man Utd 0:2 Newcastle
New
Again and again, weak and makes pathetic passing decisions.
Here we have another moments player. I know he doesn’t the no.10 role as well, but he just has physical attributes which makes him more of a liability in the PL.
This is not a comparison with our awful attackers we have, but he is just not good enough. He never plays through balls too.
Here we have another moments player. I know he doesn’t the no.10 role as well, but he just has physical attributes which makes him more of a liability in the PL.
This is not a comparison with our awful attackers we have, but he is just not good enough. He never plays through balls too.
He’s played through ball to Rashford earlier this season and he played a through ball last game chipped through towards Bruno and Højlund. There are no through balls to be played because Højlund is no that guy mate.
How could you possible tell in this awful team? He basically needs to win the ball back and dribble the length of the pitch to achieve anything
Not one of his better games. I thought he struggled against Wolves as well, but this seems to reflect a broader issue with the team and the environment around our players. Too often, we see individuals being dragged down by the collective struggles. We've seen it happen with Martinez. I hope Amad doesn’t follow the same pattern.
Every team is putting 2 players on him and the full back in charge or him is sitting deep to begin with to kill any sort of creativity from him.
Struggled but can't blame him really. Newcastle were aware of his threat. You can see their players rushing back to help the full back whenever he has the ball.
Moronic comment.
Moronic, like when saw clear deficiencies in Bruno and Garnacho when they were playing ‘great’. Low LQ comment.
Teams are aware of him now and doubling up on him. But we should be able to use that to our advantage through good movement around him.
And again we saw him come to life when Antony came on. He needs someone on his wavelength. The team needs it.
And again we saw him come to life when Antony came on. He needs someone on his wavelength. The team needs it.
If we had any intelligence up top you'd think there's a lot of room to exploit left open by the four defenders rushing to Amad when he gets the ball.
So when Amad plays mediocre it's the other players fault right??
I wouldn't hold your breath on that one!
No, it’s just basic football. It’s a team game, did you know? Even when you have superstars well beyond Amad.
Yet he gets a free pass when he's poor right?
He was poor tonight, as was everyone else, just say it how it is.
I think more that Gordon really supports his FB, I'm not sure they specifically 'put two on him' like we used to see with Ronaldo every game. We're just used to watching Rashford, Garnacho as wide men who like to walk back and watch their FB getting roasted.
Love how you play devil's advocate to everything Amad does right and miss context entirely. All of your posts in this thread and iirc last year's performance are 'yeah but..'. The poster you're quoting didn't even say he gets a pass yet here you are telling them to criticise Amad 'equally'.
Amad was indeed mediocre, except everyone else was a level below and shite. If he's our best performing/most offensive threat player for the past 10 or so games, then yes it's also up to the other players to step up and recognise the attention he's getting. He was literally covered by 2-5 players when he got the ball and more often than not, laid it off to retain or recycle possession progressively. He was also selfish and made quite a few mistakes but still did more than most.
Just say you don't like Amad and stop with insidious comments. It's very clear you're not a fan, admit it.