GMoore23
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2014
- Messages
- 3,862
This kid is on his way to being world class.
Signed by Ole and his team who were said to be clueless.
Signed by Ole and his team who were said to be clueless.
Yes. It was clear he was a wonderkid talent, he was good enough to play over James but he didn’t. The summer budget was then wasted on Sancho instead of signing a midfielder and prioritising Amad’s development.Amad had just turned 19 and had only made 4 senior appearances for Atalanta when he signed for us. Did you expect Ole to throw him in the deep end for PL games during the lockdown season?
Yes. It was clear he was a wonderkid talent, he was good enough to play over James but he didn’t. The summer budget was then wasted on Sancho instead of signing a midfielder.
Amad was tiny, he needed time to physically adapt to men's football. That's why he's had multiple loans in smaller leagues before he impressed with Sunderland.Like he did with Dan James?
He wasn’t injured in the half season before the summer, prior to Solskjaer being sacked. That’s the period that’s being referred to. He scored vs AC Milan and then was dropped for the rest of the season more or less, despite plenty of opportunity for him to get minutes. Amad showed quality and was shunned for it.What about his injuries? They seem to have been forgotten about.
My point is mainly on the "not ready" part. He never really even got a sniff to show he "wasn't ready" and the very sparse minutes he had were at striker.Yeah but he wasn't ready and was constantly picking up injuries remember.
When ETH picked Forson over him, that was the time to question things.
Prior to that he was either injured, not ready or on loan.
Proper player now though. A real football brain.
He wasn’t injured in the half season before the summer, prior to Solskjaer being sacked. That’s the period that’s being referred to. He scored vs AC Milan and then was dropped for the rest of the season more or less, despite plenty of opportunity for him to get minutes. Amad showed quality and was shunned for it.
As bad as each other mate.For the record I don't really blame Ole. Ten Hag deserves much more blame
The numbers speak for themselves but the one thing they don't tell you, which I probably like most about Amad: His decision making is very strong.
There is so much to be said for someone who makes the right choice the majority of the time. It is a talent in and of itself to have two options and consistently pick the one that is best for the team.
Because he was fearing for his job and Garnacho and Rashford both scored goals in the league cup game against a lower league team.It was weird that Ten Hag decided to sideline him for several games consecutively after he made him a regular in the early games this season, if I remember, from the community shield game till end of September he played most games apart from Liverpool and Barnsley, and suddenly from October until he was fired he just totally sidelined him for no reason at all.
Now with RvN and Amorim, he has played alot and showed his quality, today he just proved why he should be a permanent fixture, as an RWB or and AM maybe.
He wasn’t injured in the half season before the summer, prior to Solskjaer being sacked. That’s the period that’s being referred to. He scored vs AC Milan and then was dropped for the rest of the season more or less, despite plenty of opportunity for him to get minutes. Amad showed quality and was shunned for it.
Signed by Ole and his team who were said to be clueless.
it’s why Garnacho needs to improve on his decision making.It's something I think we've sorely lacked going forward for years is enough good decision makers. It helps so much with general control of the game BUT it also gives a player room for error in his execution if he can constantly make quality decisions. Amad wasn't as sharp in the final third today as I've seen before but it didn't matter ultimately because he kept choosing the right option on and off the ball which saw him ultimately bag 2 assists and play great. If a player constantly chooses the wrong option as an attacker, his execution and ability has to be that much sharper to make up for it and still produce at a high level.
I honestly don't have a clue. Shaw will certainly play LCB because Martinez is suspended, and Ugarte will start as well. But I don't have the faintest idea on the front 3. I just hope Garnacho doesn't start. Would rather see some combo of Hojlund/Zirkzee/Mount/Bruno/Rashford/Amad for those 3 spots right now.Does anyone else think he might be played in one of the AM positions against Arsenal? I think Amorim might play Mazraoui at RWB and bring in Shaw or Maguire at centre half to help solidify things. Could be well off as well obviously.
Absolutely. He's not gifted enough with raw ability to be as poor of a decision maker as he often is, but in that same vein he can absolutely elevate himself to a very consistent contributor just by improving that mental side because he has enough instincts and engine to constantly get into those dangerous positions where it won't matter if he has a few bad crosses/or passes.it’s why Garnacho needs to improve on his decision making.
He was ready to help us knock out AC Milan out of Europe. It’s not about him not starting, it’s about him not getting used full stop, including off the bench. Solskjaer signing Sancho instead of prioritising Amad reinforces my original point.He'd only been at the club a couple of months at that point hadn't he? Barely kicked a ball in first XI football. It's hardly outrageous to sat he wasn't ready to start games for one of the world's biggest clubs. Also had Greenwood ahead of him at that stage. You'd have dropped Greenwood for him?
We have a higher chance of winning if Dalot gets benched and Maz plays LWB.Does anyone else think he might be played in one of the AM positions against Arsenal? I think Amorim might play Mazraoui at RWB and bring in Shaw or Maguire at centre half to help solidify things. Could be well off as well obviously.
My point is mainly on the "not ready" part. He never really even got a sniff to show he "wasn't ready" and the very sparse minutes he had were at striker.
For the record I don't really blame Ole. Ten Hag deserves much more blame
What a player. My MOTM today. His technique is superb, he has good vision and a real desire to apply himself. I love how he created two goals just by pressing aggressively.
But a big chunk of that was injuries. The length and timing of them were just unfortunate. Also we do have to give the coaching staff a bit of credit. They can generally see when a young player is ready or not. His spell at Rangers showed he wasn't.
He was injured for the first half of last season as well. It's not like ETH just shunned him.
But starting Forson ahead of him was a shocker. That was ETH just going for the player who was a bit bigger/faster. Really basic thinking.
I'm desperate to see Amad play as an AM but honestly I think Vs Arsenal I'd keep him at RWB. He is playing so well there at the moment I wouldn't change things around too much in such a tough game.Does anyone else think he might be played in one of the AM positions against Arsenal? I think Amorim might play Mazraoui at RWB and bring in Shaw or Maguire at centre half to help solidify things. Could be well off as well obviously.
He was ready to help us knock out AC Milan out of Europe. It’s not about him not starting, it’s about him not getting used full stop, including off the bench. Solskjaer signing Sancho instead of prioritising Amad reinforces my original point.
You realize he's only been injured twice right? The bad knee injury last summer that saw him out until close to Xmas, and then a month long thigh injury right at the beginning of that 21/22 season.
I think you are kinda missing my point. I am not disputing where Diallo was when he arrived. He could and should have been developed with a view to integration into the first team sooner. That became abundantly clear when the club blew all that money on Antony. Ole was here for 1 and a 1/2 years and brought in James and never tried to bring Diallo through. Maybe I am being harsh but it is shocking that he has been here for 4 years and is only now getting his chance. I remember James Horncastle writing at the time that United had an amazing coup in getting him.Dan James was 5 years older than Amad and had over 50 first team appearances to his name. The 20/21 season was too early to throw Amad into the deep end. Giving him a few cameos in the Europa League was the correct way to bed in a 19 year old with very few senior appearances to his name.
He struggled for one game in Scotland, vs Celtic at Celtic park, where Rangers were awful as a whole. From that point they had a lot to play for, making the EL final and in a title race, Von Bronckhorst’s conservative style meant Amad wasn’t prioritised there. If you look at his per 90 stats in Scotland, he played very well when he was used.It was one goal, how much are you taking from that. I could point out him struggling in the Scottish League to prove he wasn't ready. All a bit reductive.
But a big chunk of that was injuries. The length and timing of them were just unfortunate. Also we do have to give the coaching staff a bit of credit. They can generally see when a young player is ready or not. His spell at Rangers showed he wasn't.
He was injured for the first half of last season as well. It's not like ETH just shunned him.
But starting Forson ahead of him was a shocker. That was ETH just going for the player who was a bit bigger/faster. Really basic thinking.
The only time you could say for sure Amad should have been getting more chances was the second half of last season but under the cosh ETH went with players who had a bit more proven end product. I didn't agree but it wasn't exactly scandalous either.
Amad only arrived at the club in January 2021 and Ole was sacked by November 2021. There was very little time to bed in a 19 year old Amad into the first team during that period.Ole was here for 1 and a 1/2 years and brought in James and never tried to bring Diallo through. Maybe I am being harsh but it is shocking that he has been here for 4 years and is only now getting his chance.
I just feel it's being overplayed a bit.The bolded first sentence is generous but going by that metric, we also can question/criticise when they can (aka can't in our case) see when a player is not playing well/tired (Garnacho/Rashford/Antony etc). Thus, they should then give another talented player, with the right skillset and work ethic a chance through subs and rotation. It's basically the whole crux of the 'why wasn't Amad playing more?' we find ourselves in. Except we keep seeing 'he was injured, wasn't ready, ETH sidelined because he did perform or is his style of player' etc still bandied about.
I've said this before but I have sympathy for ETH because it was evident in last year's pre-season he was hyped and ready to play both Mainoo and Amad. Unfortunately for him and them, both got injured. However, what I can't excuse is the over playing of Mainoo in the second half of the season and the lack of minutes given to Amad, when all our options were massively inconsistent (even Garnacho who was productive).
It's not 'scandalous' in the same way constantly playing McTominay (and asking him to abandon midfield) and Garnacho/Rashford despite their troubles (fatigue/form) last season was i.e all things to the detriment of our football. I can understand why ETH did it and it's because he didn't know what he was doing or couldn't achieve it. Except this cost him his job. That's pretty scandalous to me. Of course I'm not equating not playing Amad as the reason to his downfall but it was symptomatic of his reign here, a lack of adaptability and actual coaching to give the players a platform to perform.
Ole didn't bring him it was Club led recruitment and he wasn't any better in his treatment of Amad either .
Amad could have hit his stride way sooner had he been shown bit more trust by his earlier managers and also not been unlucky with injuries .