TsuWave
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2013
- Messages
- 15,619
I hope this right wing back madness stops before it even starts. Wasting the kid there
Dalot is best suited on the bench. He was shit again.Dalot is probably the best suited out of the current squad. Antony and Mazraoui could be options there too, although I do think Mazraoui suits the RCB role quite nicely.
Yes poor game yesterday. I dont recall he having a great game ever on the left. He is much better on the right - his natural side.Dalot is best suited on the bench. He was shit again.
Dalot is best suited on the bench. He was shit again.
You won't get any arguments from me on the second part.Dalot is best suited on the bench. He was shit again.
Our attack need a player like Amad that is able to make a difference. The result and the game obviously showed that. Him playing well there doesn't mean that is the best for the team. It's only justified if the team is flying or the result is showing, but obviously that isn't the case.Don't disagree that that might have been better for Amad's performance.
But then you have to play a different attacker at wingback instead, and I don't particularly see any of the other attackers doing as well from that position. Or you have to play a fullback there instead, in which case you're lining up quite defensively, especially for a game against a side like Ipswich.
Ultimately it's about what's best for the team. And there's not much benefit getting an improvement at #10 by playing Amad if you get a commensurate disimprovement at wing-back. And on paper we have a lot more options at #10 than at wing-back.
This was one of his best displays in a United shirt. While we obviously want to see our most gifted players further forward, it’s a transitional period, he’s only 22 and I thought he played very well.I hope this right wing back madness stops before it even starts. Wasting the kid there
This was one of his best displays in a United shirt.
Nope, you’re wrong.You’re wrong - and I’m not going to do a silly back and forth about this either. He played relatively well because he’s technically sound, but he’s played better before - and no this wasn’t one of his best displays. He’s wasted as a wing back and needs to play closer to opposition goal
I’m not being overly critical of Amorim as he’s had limited time with the players and not all options are available just yet, hence - “I hope this thing stops before it even becomes a thing”
I agree it was out of necessity it seems (available centre backs pushing Mazraui there). He needs to play as one of the players behind the striker, on form pushing Garnacho to the brench. Mazraui to the wing back, Yoro in RCB place. He had a solid game. His understanding with Mazraui also looks promising.You’re wrong - and I’m not going to do a silly back and forth about this either. He played relatively well because he’s technically sound, but he’s played better before - and no this wasn’t one of his best displays. He’s wasted as a wing back and needs to play closer to opposition goal
I’m not being overly critical of Amorim as he’s had limited time with the players and not all options are available just yet, hence - “I hope this thing stops before it even becomes a thing”
He’s never been anything but the opposite of lazy, so I don’t think that narrative is going away because of reality.Regardless of his role, you'd like to think the narrative of him being lazy is done now.
You'd also expect him to be player of the month again regardless of the Bodoe/Glimt result.
Turned off twice, not once. He was out of the game a lot due in part to the midfield being leftist, but also in part I think because of his movements. Sometimes I think he was too low in the pitch when we helde the ball in midfield/attack. All this notwithstanding, for me he was our stand out superior outfield player today.
Agreed. Would be interesting to see Amad start instead of Bruno as a 10 as he retains possession so much better allowing the midfield players some respite and so could enable Casimero to be more impactful (especially his forward passing) rather than being knackered from having to constantly run back.I remember reading posts in Amad threads before that he was slow
Really good performance from him. In my opinion at the moment Onana, Mazraroui and Amad are the first names on the team sheet.
He’s not that good on the right too. His crosses and shots are basically just hit as hard as possible and hope for the best.You won't get any arguments from me on the second part.
The only slight benefit of the doubt I can give him is that he was playing on the left, if he gets the chance on the right in Amorim's system and still can't make it work, I'd drop him too.
None of his best attributes are on display at wing-back; the inside right role is custom made for him in this system and we have nobody else who has his skillset and technical ability to thrive and exploit half spaces with sudden bursts of athleticism, technical ability and creativity - he can take pictures of unfolding play and exploit, unlike the rest.
Antony, Dalot and the like should be contesting a position so far away from the action, not our most incisive player and I hope that little experiment is put to bed post haste because it’s a waste of talent and we don’t have much of that here.
Amad stuck to his defensive work fairly well, but in terms of what he did on the ball it was really only the first 10 minutes and then that moment at the end of the match where he did anything notable. The rest of the time he almost always just received the ball, looked forward and then passed it back to a central defender. Long term we really need the wingback to be moving the ball forward (either through carrying it himself or passing it) a lot more than Amad did in this match. In saying that, if nobody was actually making themselves available to receive a pass then it's not all his fault, but his lack of carrying the ball forward (other than the first 10 minutes where he did it a few times) did limit us a bit.This was one of his best displays in a United shirt. While we obviously want to see our most gifted players further forward, it’s a transitional period, he’s only 22 and I thought he played very well.
Amad stuck to his defensive work fairly well, but in terms of what he did on the ball it was really only the first 10 minutes and then that moment at the end of the match where he did anything notable. The rest of the time he almost always just received the ball, looked forward and then passed it back to a central defender. Long term we really need the wingback to be moving the ball forward (either through carrying it himself or passing it) a lot more than Amad did in this match. In saying that, if nobody was actually making themselves available to receive a pass then it's not all his fault, but his lack of carrying the ball forward (other than the first 10 minutes where he did it a few times) did limit us a bit.
Don't get me wrong, he played well and was one of our better players. When we actually got him near the opposition box he was by far the most dangerous player. But by playing in that position he didn't get near the opposition box anywhere near enough. I feel that in his relatively small sample size of performances, he's had quite a lot of better performances.
It doesn’t really matter if he showed he can play wingback; how about he shows his optimal level in the pocket of space where he is perma threat throughout a game rather than sporadically, like for the goal you cite? Even for the benefit of the team, it’s more useful to have someone who can give the opposition fits trying to track him and his actions, closer to the action in hotter zones of the pitch.You must have missed the first goal
I think he will convince the manager to use him in AM, but he showed that he can play wingback very well with his pace, dribbling and found a good cross for Rashford to finish. These are some of his best attributes
Playing further forward and inside will enable him to start his attacks further up the pitch than he did for the first goal and be more of a threat to the opposition keeper. But he was fantastic at wingback as well.
You’ve literally highlighted why Amad shouldn’t be there. Way, way to low in attacking data; that’s a role for someone else.I think you're going to be dissappointed if you want to see our wingbacks making more than 2 dribbles and 2 key passes in games
All of Sporting's wingback options are 1.6 key passes or less per game. Quenda averages 2 dribbles a game and 1.6 key passes and Catamo 2.3 dribbles but with 1 key pass
We will probably play Dalot or Maz there once all our centre backs are available/fit again.You’ve literally highlighted why Amad shouldn’t be there. Way, way to low in attacking data; that’s a role for someone else.
It's not so much the key passes, which I expect Amad will do very well when he gets in the right positions. More just the normal progressive passing that helps the team move forward and get on the front foot rather than back to the central defenders. Nothing wrong with passing it back when needed, but against Ipswich it definitely happened too often IMO. Perhaps that was due to teammates not making themselves available (it's a bit hard to tell sometimes on television), but at the time it felt like Amad was just playing too safe a lot of the time.I think you're going to be dissappointed if you want to see our wingbacks making more than 2 dribbles and 2 key passes in games
All of Sporting's wingback options are 1.6 key passes or less per game. Quenda averages 2 dribbles a game and 1.6 key passes and Catamo 2.3 dribbles but with 1 key pass
Edit - Araujo has played LWB and does average 5.1 dribbles but 1.7 key passes. But Catamo, Nuno Santos and Quenda are picked more often.
You're probably right. He did an excellent job in an unfamiliar position but was a bit too cautious at times. He's surely been earmarked for 1 of the #10 positions in the long run though, he's just too technically talented to be out on the touchline for most of the match.It's not so much the key passes, which I expect Amad will do very well when he gets in the right positions. More just the normal progressive passing that helps the team move forward and get on the front foot rather than back to the central defenders. Nothing wrong with passing it back when needed, but against Ipswich it definitely happened too often IMO. Perhaps that was due to teammates not making themselves available (it's a bit hard to tell sometimes on television), but at the time it felt like Amad was just playing too safe a lot of the time.
Ultimately, if Amad is going to play that role regularly, the two things that I definitely want to improve is him progressing the ball better (whether through passing or carrying it) and he himself getting into attacking positions more often. Considering this was the first ever time he's played that position and the first time the team has played that formation, it's something that could easily just improve with time. But right now I tend to think both he and the team would be better off with him closer to the opposition goal in one of the #10's.
I remember reading posts in Amad threads before that he was slow
Really good performance from him. In my opinion at the moment Onana, Mazraroui and Amad are the first names on the team sheet.
You're probably right. He did an excellent job in an unfamiliar position but was a bit too cautious at times. He's surely been earmarked for 1 of the #10 positions in the long run though, he's just too technically talented to be out on the touchline for most of the match.
I hope this right wing back madness stops before it even starts. Wasting the kid there
When a club spends 80 or so million on a player you wanted, you're inclined to try make it work.It's still a mystery why ETH just didnt fancy Amad and utilise him as much. It was so obvious that he was the most technical player on the team; he's fantastic at keeping the ball, playing one-twos and finding the passing angles.
He's a bit like Foden in that sense. You're fooled into thinking that he's one of those technical, creative, passer type of players. However, he definitely is deceptively fast.He has an extra gear. He just doesnt use it often.
I noticed it when he was playing in some academy game years back -- he has this sudden burst of speed which surprised me. Strangely, I have not seen it utilised since even at Rangers or even Sunderland.
Always fit, can play multiple positions. He should stay.I hope the club moves him on next summer.
Always fit, can play multiple positions. He should stay.
Good teams have players like him.
He was there due to a shortage of centre backs. Going forward it’ll be Shaw / Maz / DalotI hope this right wing back madness stops before it even starts. Wasting the kid there
Interesting you say that as I thought he was pretty good there imo. Once Yoro is back I anticipate it will be Maz at right wingback however.I hope this right wing back madness stops before it even starts. Wasting the kid there