What is your rationale?
I'm not so sure it's worth the time engaging...
What is your rationale?
Primarily because of fear and Trump’s seeming unpredictability.What is your rationale?
Yeah, off to the Ronaldo thread.I'm not so sure it's worth the time engaging...
What on earth are you on about? Trump was nothing but a kitten to Putin simpering over him at every opportunity.Primarily because of fear and Trump’s seeming unpredictability.
Why would Putin be more fearful of a guy who is easily manipulated, clearly admires Putin, and has signalled no intention to support Ukraine, instead planning to pressure them to give up land in order to secure the most unstable form of “peace” imaginable? It makes no sense.Primarily because of fear and Trump’s seeming unpredictability.
And Putin got him elected too I suppose?What on earth are you on about? Trump was nothing but a kitten to Putin simpering over him at every opportunity.
Putin ran a campaign of disinformation benefitting him. How effective it was is open to debate.And Putin got him elected too I suppose?
Yeah, off to the Ronaldo thread.
Why would Putin be more fearful of a guy who is easily manipulated, clearly admires Putin, and has signalled no intention to support Ukraine, instead planning to pressure them to give up land in order to secure the most unstable form of “peace” imaginable? It makes no sense.
Well we have the evidence that Trump authorised sending offensive weapons to Ukraine, but that aside you could say that he’s ‘easily manipulated’ because there’s a lot of evidence to suggest that he’s a transactional person. So what could Putin have offered him in return for turning a blind eye?Why would Putin be more fearful of a guy who is easily manipulated, clearly admires Putin and has signalled no intention to support Ukraine, instead planning to pressure Them to give up land to secure the most unstable form of “peace” imaginable. It makes no sense.
Philadelphia’s district attorney asked a state judge on Monday to shut down tech billionaire Elon Musk’s controversial $1 million giveaway to registered voters, calling it an “illegal lottery scheme.”
Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner, a Democrat, filed the civil lawsuit against Musk and his pro-Trump group, America PAC.
“America PAC and Musk are lulling Philadelphia citizens – and others in the Commonwealth (and other swing states in the upcoming election) – to give up their personal identifying information and make a political pledge in exchange for the chance to win $1 million,” the lawsuit alleges. “That is a lottery. And it is indisputably an unlawful lottery.”
Was always coming especially after DOJ warned him this was probably illegal. Interesting take though DA is approaching it as an illegal lottery period according to state law. Would think this survives even if Trump wins as a state chargeIn the lawsuit, Krasner’s office argues that Pennsylvania law requires all lotteries to be “operated and administered by the state” – and that Musk’s daily $1 million giveaway must be halted because it’s operating outside of those legal guardrails.
“Though Musk says that a winner’s selection is ‘random,’ that appears false because multiple winners that have been selected are individuals who have shown up at Trump rallies in Pennsylvania,” the lawsuit says, arguing that the lottery rules are “deceptive.”
The case is based on Pennsylvania’s lottery and consumer protection laws. Krasner said his lawsuit was not about state and federal laws that prohibit vote-buying.
Philadelphia DA sues Elon Musk and his super PAC over $1M sweepstakes
Was always coming especially after DOJ warned him this was probably illegal. Interesting take though DA is approaching it as an illegal lottery period according to state law. Would think this survives even if Trump wins as a state charge
Indeed it is. It isn’t an underlying reason for why Trump has received the amount of the support that he has though, just like it wasn’t for the Brexit vote for example. These things have been stirring and simmering for a long time.Putin ran a campaign of disinformation benefitting him. How effective it was is open to debate.
I’m familiar with it yeah.It’s all published in the Mueller report if you choose to believe it.
So you accept that Putin backed Trump but you also think he would be too scared of Trump to have attacked Ukraine?Indeed it is. It isn’t an underlying reason for why Trump has received the amount of the support that he has though, just like it wasn’t for the Brexit vote for example. These things have been stirring and simmering for a long time.
I’m familiar with it yeah.
1) How is this relevant today when Trump has repeatedly stated his intention to withdraw arms support of Ukraine and pressure them to enter “peace” negotiations on Russia’s terms?1) Well we have the evidence that Trump authorised sending offensive weapons to Ukraine, but that aside 2) you could say that he’s ‘easily manipulated’ because there’s a lot of evidence to suggest that he’s a transactional person. So what could Putin have offered him in return for turning a blind eye?
3) In any case Putin launched the invasion when Trump was out of office. One also has to ask the question then of whether the Russia invasion of Ukraine had a kind of inevitability to it?
I accept that the Russian state tries to interfere in elections…for their own nefarious reasons (just like we know that America has interfered in elections over the decades for their own reasons). What specific outcome they hope to achieve, beyond the obvious internal division that has resulted, is another thing though.So you accept that Putin backed Trump but you also think he would be too scared of Trump to have attacked Ukraine?
Whatever about his reasons…I do think that Russia has been stoked over the years, primarily by NATO expansion, into committing such actions.What do you think Putin’s reasons for going into Ukraine?
Because with Trump what he says and what he actually does are often two very different things.1) How is this relevant today when Trump has repeatedly stated his intention to withdraw arms support of Ukraine and pressure them to enter “peace” negotiations on Russia’s terms?
The evidence over the course of Trump’s life strongly suggests that he’s a transactional person. In other words he’s quid pro quo.2) What does this mean?
I’m posing the question of whether the Russian invasion of Ukraine was inevitable, leaving the response to it the only thing worth debating.3) Again, what are you saying?
He offered him Trump Tower, Moscow.Well we have the evidence that Trump authorised sending offensive weapons to Ukraine, but that aside you could say that he’s ‘easily manipulated’ because there’s a lot of evidence to suggest that he’s a transactional person. So what could Putin have offered him in return for turning a blind eye?
In any case Putin launched the invasion when Trump was out of office. One also has to ask the question then of whether the Russia invasion of Ukraine had a kind of inevitability to it?
I have literally never met anyone who fits this description.40% of Americans don't vote, most of them take not voting as a point of pride, a kind of identity.
Then you also have the ones who go about life completely tuning out anything to do with politics, but start to pay attention a week or two before the election and vote for whoever they like more.
Us political junkies are really the exceptions, civic engagement isn't a strong point for 'muricans.
I’m posing the question of whether the Russian invasion of Ukraine was inevitable, leaving the response to it the only thing worth debating.
Certainly feels like there’s a strong and pretty broad reaction to it. Reason to hope it might move some voters. It won’t have to be that many to make a difference.The Madison Square Garden rally might be the kick up the ass a lot of voters needed, because the racism, misogyny, and jingoism were off the charts.
Trump is in Putins pocket.Why would Putin be more fearful of a guy who is easily manipulated, clearly admires Putin, and has signalled no intention to support Ukraine, instead planning to pressure them to give up land in order to secure the most unstable form of “peace” imaginable? It makes no sense.
The Madison Square Garden rally might be the kick up the ass a lot of voters needed, because the racism, misogyny, and jingoism were off the charts.
That's a topic that should be discussed in the Russia-Ukraine thread.
You have never met someone who said they don't vote because it's useless, nothing ever change, people who do are sheeps? I met one in real life as a coworker (and it was in bloody 'straya) and multiple in online chatrooms.I have literally never met anyone who fits this description.
This was Nuremburg 2.0. Anybody who comes on here and says, "yeah, but she doesn't explain he policies well can go feck them selves.Absolutely this has just murdered Trump. They’re now in damage control but he’s fecked. Absolutely they have just screwed the pooch.
Putin ran a campaign of disinformation benefitting him. How effective it was is open to debate.
It’s all published in the Mueller report if you choose to believe it.
I’m in MD too. Heard “not voting” and “Stein”. Heard that in VA too, which is more concerning.Anecdotal but this is my experience. I live in MD so it doesn’t matter but quite a few people have said to me “I’m not voting Trump, I don’t know if I’ll vote at all”.
Interesting question. I can only answer on my impression/perspective of course. One neighbour I have I could see that being a possibility although he and his wife talk enough shit about another neighbour with a Trump flag it would be a little odd. I have a classic “boomer uncle who’s a WWII junkie” who has always been extremely loud about his political opinions now with extreme Trump/Fox fatigue. For him it’s the war in Ukraine and the MAGA stance on it. I think that’s genuine because he always is so vocal of who he supports. Honestly most of the pro Trump voters around me are pretty vocal about it. My MIL is at Facebook posts about freedom levels.Do you suspect with some that they actually will vote, and their assertion is code for a Trump vote?
Anecdotal but this is my experience. I live in MD so it doesn’t matter but quite a few people have said to me “I’m not voting Trump, I don’t know if I’ll vote at all”.
It's MD so more about one less vote for Hogan. I think Alsobrooks is safe but Maine 2020 still gives me PTSD flare up sometimes.Would prefer the vote to flip to Harris, but one less vote for Trump is always good.
Harris on Club Shay Shay now
It's a softball, of course, but she is quite likeable in this.