2024 U.S. Elections | Trump v Harris

Primarily because of fear and Trump’s seeming unpredictability.
What on earth are you on about? Trump was nothing but a kitten to Putin simpering over him at every opportunity.
 
Primarily because of fear and Trump’s seeming unpredictability.
Why would Putin be more fearful of a guy who is easily manipulated, clearly admires Putin, and has signalled no intention to support Ukraine, instead planning to pressure them to give up land in order to secure the most unstable form of “peace” imaginable? It makes no sense.
 
And Putin got him elected too I suppose?
Putin ran a campaign of disinformation benefitting him. How effective it was is open to debate.

It’s all published in the Mueller report if you choose to believe it.
 
Why would Putin be more fearful of a guy who is easily manipulated, clearly admires Putin, and has signalled no intention to support Ukraine, instead planning to pressure them to give up land in order to secure the most unstable form of “peace” imaginable? It makes no sense.

Exactly. It's the go to response for simple minded conservative Trump supporters. "Oh he'll stop Putin, oh he won't start any wars" yada yada. Sure!
 
Why would Putin be more fearful of a guy who is easily manipulated, clearly admires Putin and has signalled no intention to support Ukraine, instead planning to pressure Them to give up land to secure the most unstable form of “peace” imaginable. It makes no sense.
Well we have the evidence that Trump authorised sending offensive weapons to Ukraine, but that aside you could say that he’s ‘easily manipulated’ because there’s a lot of evidence to suggest that he’s a transactional person. So what could Putin have offered him in return for turning a blind eye?

In any case Putin launched the invasion when Trump was out of office. One also has to ask the question then of whether the Russia invasion of Ukraine had a kind of inevitability to it?
 

Philadelphia DA sues Elon Musk and his super PAC over $1M sweepstakes

Philadelphia’s district attorney asked a state judge on Monday to shut down tech billionaire Elon Musk’s controversial $1 million giveaway to registered voters, calling it an “illegal lottery scheme.”

Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner, a Democrat, filed the civil lawsuit against Musk and his pro-Trump group, America PAC.

“America PAC and Musk are lulling Philadelphia citizens – and others in the Commonwealth (and other swing states in the upcoming election) – to give up their personal identifying information and make a political pledge in exchange for the chance to win $1 million,” the lawsuit alleges. “That is a lottery. And it is indisputably an unlawful lottery.”
In the lawsuit, Krasner’s office argues that Pennsylvania law requires all lotteries to be “operated and administered by the state” – and that Musk’s daily $1 million giveaway must be halted because it’s operating outside of those legal guardrails.

“Though Musk says that a winner’s selection is ‘random,’ that appears false because multiple winners that have been selected are individuals who have shown up at Trump rallies in Pennsylvania,” the lawsuit says, arguing that the lottery rules are “deceptive.”


The case is based on Pennsylvania’s lottery and consumer protection laws. Krasner said his lawsuit was not about state and federal laws that prohibit vote-buying.
Was always coming especially after DOJ warned him this was probably illegal. Interesting take though DA is approaching it as an illegal lottery period according to state law. Would think this survives even if Trump wins as a state charge
 
Putin ran a campaign of disinformation benefitting him. How effective it was is open to debate.
Indeed it is. It isn’t an underlying reason for why Trump has received the amount of the support that he has though, just like it wasn’t for the Brexit vote for example. These things have been stirring and simmering for a long time.

It’s all published in the Mueller report if you choose to believe it.
I’m familiar with it yeah.
 
Indeed it is. It isn’t an underlying reason for why Trump has received the amount of the support that he has though, just like it wasn’t for the Brexit vote for example. These things have been stirring and simmering for a long time.


I’m familiar with it yeah.
So you accept that Putin backed Trump but you also think he would be too scared of Trump to have attacked Ukraine?


What do you think Putin’s reasons for going into Ukraine?
 
1) Well we have the evidence that Trump authorised sending offensive weapons to Ukraine, but that aside 2) you could say that he’s ‘easily manipulated’ because there’s a lot of evidence to suggest that he’s a transactional person. So what could Putin have offered him in return for turning a blind eye?

3) In any case Putin launched the invasion when Trump was out of office. One also has to ask the question then of whether the Russia invasion of Ukraine had a kind of inevitability to it?
1) How is this relevant today when Trump has repeatedly stated his intention to withdraw arms support of Ukraine and pressure them to enter “peace” negotiations on Russia’s terms?

2) What does this mean?

3) Again, what are you saying?
 
So you accept that Putin backed Trump but you also think he would be too scared of Trump to have attacked Ukraine?
I accept that the Russian state tries to interfere in elections…for their own nefarious reasons (just like we know that America has interfered in elections over the decades for their own reasons). What specific outcome they hope to achieve, beyond the obvious internal division that has resulted, is another thing though.

What do you think Putin’s reasons for going into Ukraine?
Whatever about his reasons…I do think that Russia has been stoked over the years, primarily by NATO expansion, into committing such actions.
 
1) How is this relevant today when Trump has repeatedly stated his intention to withdraw arms support of Ukraine and pressure them to enter “peace” negotiations on Russia’s terms?
Because with Trump what he says and what he actually does are often two very different things.

2) What does this mean?
The evidence over the course of Trump’s life strongly suggests that he’s a transactional person. In other words he’s quid pro quo.

He may have some moral objections to America’s repeated and almost wholly disastrous military actions/interventions since the turn of the century, but I think his main objection is that he doesn’t see how it benefits him specifically, and America financially. The long term ‘interests’ of the American state are irrelevant to him.

3) Again, what are you saying?
I’m posing the question of whether the Russian invasion of Ukraine was inevitable, leaving the response to it the only thing worth debating.
 
Well we have the evidence that Trump authorised sending offensive weapons to Ukraine, but that aside you could say that he’s ‘easily manipulated’ because there’s a lot of evidence to suggest that he’s a transactional person. So what could Putin have offered him in return for turning a blind eye?

In any case Putin launched the invasion when Trump was out of office. One also has to ask the question then of whether the Russia invasion of Ukraine had a kind of inevitability to it?
He offered him Trump Tower, Moscow.
 
40% of Americans don't vote, most of them take not voting as a point of pride, a kind of identity.

Then you also have the ones who go about life completely tuning out anything to do with politics, but start to pay attention a week or two before the election and vote for whoever they like more.

Us political junkies are really the exceptions, civic engagement isn't a strong point for 'muricans.
I have literally never met anyone who fits this description.
 
It's not just Putin having his claws into Trump. His whole backroom staff/republican party is riddled with compromised tools. RFK, Vivek, Vance, Moscow Marge are to name but few, who have expressed points that current russian regime sympathisers have parroted.
 
The Madison Square Garden rally might be the kick up the ass a lot of voters needed, because the racism, misogyny, and jingoism were off the charts.
Certainly feels like there’s a strong and pretty broad reaction to it. Reason to hope it might move some voters. It won’t have to be that many to make a difference.
 
Why would Putin be more fearful of a guy who is easily manipulated, clearly admires Putin, and has signalled no intention to support Ukraine, instead planning to pressure them to give up land in order to secure the most unstable form of “peace” imaginable? It makes no sense.
Trump is in Putins pocket.

I still believe in the pee pee tape.
 
The Madison Square Garden rally might be the kick up the ass a lot of voters needed, because the racism, misogyny, and jingoism were off the charts.

Agree.

And can you imagine what these people say when the cameras are not rolling?

Yet, somehow people still want to discredit John Kelly and doubt the fact that Trump said in the Oval office that he wanted Generals like Hitlers. Or that they doubt Trump would ever call vets suckers and losers?
 
Putin ran a campaign of disinformation benefitting him. How effective it was is open to debate.

It’s all published in the Mueller report if you choose to believe it.

Plus, one thing that is conveniently forgotten about Trump, Russia and the Muller report is that Bill Barr got in front of the Muller report and released his own summary a few days before that effectively said "nothing to see here, Trump is innocent". This allowed Trump and co to shout that there was no collusion and that it was all a hoax.

https://www.npr.org/2022/08/20/1118625157/doj-barr-trump-russia-investigation-memo
https://www.acslaw.org/projects/the...er-report-and-attorney-general-barrs-summary/
 
Anecdotal but this is my experience. I live in MD so it doesn’t matter but quite a few people have said to me “I’m not voting Trump, I don’t know if I’ll vote at all”.
I’m in MD too. Heard “not voting” and “Stein”. Heard that in VA too, which is more concerning.
 
Do you suspect with some that they actually will vote, and their assertion is code for a Trump vote?
Interesting question. I can only answer on my impression/perspective of course. One neighbour I have I could see that being a possibility although he and his wife talk enough shit about another neighbour with a Trump flag it would be a little odd. I have a classic “boomer uncle who’s a WWII junkie” who has always been extremely loud about his political opinions now with extreme Trump/Fox fatigue. For him it’s the war in Ukraine and the MAGA stance on it. I think that’s genuine because he always is so vocal of who he supports. Honestly most of the pro Trump voters around me are pretty vocal about it. My MIL is at Facebook posts about freedom levels.

Again, Maryland so it’s pretty insignificant immediately but I doubt I’m the only one seeing it.

On the flip side I have a number of friends, mostly Arabs, possibly abstaining because of Gaza. They happen to be more in swing states too. They won’t vote Trump
 
It's a softball, of course, but she is quite likeable in this.

I think this and the Howard Stern interviews were her best interviews. Overall, podcasts now seem to be the new template that allow candidates to sit down with friendly interviewers to humanize themselves with audiences, which then gets sliced and diced for all the other social platforms. That's far more effective than sitting down for a CNN town hall imo.