calodo2003
Flaming Full Member
The initial name change // purposeful mispronunciation is probably only a few tweets / the next rally away.How vicious will Trump's rhetoric be against Kamala, y'all reckon?
The initial name change // purposeful mispronunciation is probably only a few tweets / the next rally away.How vicious will Trump's rhetoric be against Kamala, y'all reckon?
Republicans having a meltdown on Twitter. Some calling anti democratic, apparently the party shouldn’t choose its own candidate
I like her, but not as a politician, and definitely not as a presidential nominee.I agree, and I don't know. Some of the people on the CAF don't seem to like her.
How vicious will Trump's rhetoric be against Kamala, y'all reckon?
I can’t see Kamala winning. Americans didn’t vote for a woman against Trump last time let alone a one with Indian heritage. White America will not like it.
A woman fighting for abortion rights against a sexist pig. It's genius.Just hammer home abortion, Trump being a felon and stuff like that and I'd be surprised if the Dems don't win.
Was anyone excited about Biden in 2016?Alright, listen up, because here’s a gem from the guy who nailed it when he said last year that Biden’s too ancient to run and that Trump would absolutely wipe the floor with him in the debates.
Kamala Harris? Yeah, she's a real powerhouse—if you count zero accomplishments and the appeal of a soggy toast. Plus, she's got the glorious distinction of being on the ticket with a guy who bailed mid-race. It’s super annoying because this race is totally winnable. Now, if someone like Whitmer, Beshear, or Newsom (assuming they’ve got the guts) jumps in, they might actually have a shot.
It’s a bit strange that the main argument against Harris’ chances is that she’s a black woman, yet the fantasy pick seen as a certain winner is … a black woman (Obama). I think Harris could be just right for this situation. She has the air of an incumbent (and can sell the achievements of the current administration way better than Biden). And this election is about turnout. You now have both the anything but Trump motivation and an appeal to female, black and progressive voters. Give her a vanilla male running mate from a swing state like Shapiro or Walz and I think she’s a strong candidate.
Yeah you are right about the EC process. Sadly the race thing will be an issue which is a shame.Hillary received 2.87 million more votes than Trump, it's the way the US does the state EC count that gave Trump the victory. It could well be a similar result this year which would mean more people voted for the woman. But yours is a fair point on the racial undertone.
Newsom is a happy man right now.
White America is made up of a younger generation who can't stand trump. I think Joe stepping down and putting a women up against Trump is their best chance at winning.I can’t see Kamala winning. Americans didn’t vote for a woman against Trump last time let alone a one with Indian heritage. White America will not like it.
You really have an unpleasant way of debating. It’s been the same in several threads now and it’s just not worth my time, sorry, but I think you should consider working on it.Stop with this nonsense. The argument against Kamala is that she's a total lightweight, with zero accomplishments and zero charm. She bombed in the DNC primaries in 2020, finishing like 10th in a field of 12, are Democratic voters loathe to choose a black woman as their candidate? Come on now.
Hmmm I’m not sure I share your confidence and the race issue will sadly come into it.White America is made up of a younger generation who can't stand trump. I think Joe stepping down and putting a women up against Trump is their best chance at winning.
Yeah you are right about the EC process. Sadly the race thing will be an issue which is a shame.
Which is why Newsom is a big no, a Californian governor isn't winning the rust belt states. WhitmerIt is only 6 or 7 States that decide the result. Dems should pick the ticket that has the highest probability to carry these States.
Its a tough ask for the up and coming candidates. If you jump in here last minute and lose, that's likely your only shot. I don't see any of the big names being interested in taking this one. Newsom won't touch it with a barge poll, in my opinion.Kamala Harris? Yeah, she's a real powerhouse—if you count zero accomplishments and the appeal of a soggy toast. Plus, she's got the glorious distinction of being on the ticket with a guy who bailed mid-race. It’s super annoying because this race is totally winnable. Now, if someone like Whitmer, Beshear, or Newsom (assuming they’ve got the guts) jumps in, they might actually have a shot.
I like her, but not as a politician, and definitely not as a presidential nominee.
Michelle Obama said many times that she’s not interested. It would be a mistake to nominate someone who doesn’t want the job.
Besides, I want the Obama-Biden era to be over. I’ve moved on from this group. No more Bidens, no more Clintons and no more Obama’s.
No.Will they now accuse Biden of being unfit to govern? November isn’t far away, but imagine if he stepped entirely down due to health.
It also has something to do that she is extremely unpopular, has a negative approval rate, is the VP of one of the most unpopular presidents in the history, was kept hidden for the last 3.5 years, and comes from a safe blue state. She doesn't have many redeeming qualities and got the job basically by being a black woman (if it had to be a woman, both Klobuchar and Warren did far better in the primaries).I can’t see Kamala winning. Americans didn’t vote for a woman against Trump last time let alone a one with Indian heritage. White America will not like it.
Ding ding ding.Likes of Shapiro or Beshear don't have the name recognition to win a presidential election in 3 months or so. Be serious. For better or worse, Kamala has that.
Being cynical, wouldn't that be counter-productive? Voters would see Harris as the actual President, and if she does well... It seems the Republicans are better off with the status quo.Will they now accuse Biden of being unfit to govern? November isn’t far away, but imagine if he stepped down entirely due to poor health.
I can’t see Kamala winning. Americans didn’t vote for a woman against Trump last time let alone a one with Indian heritage. White America will not like it.
The next presidential debate is scheduled for September 10th.This allows Democrats to reverse the narrative and attack Trump as being too old and mentally incapable. And with 34 felonies. Will be interesting to see if Trump chooses to do any more debates. Harris is a more aggressive personality than Biden and that might work well against the orange one.
Was anyone excited about Biden in 2016?
I didn’t like Harris as a VP pick, don’t like her for the presidency. But I’ll vote for whoever is picked.
Biden’s genius was being even more populist than Trump, we need the candidate to make it clear they will continue in that vein.
Just so depressing that neither party can put a human you’d admire up for the presidency.
Precisely, many don’t realize that this was the key. Progressives will vote for any Democrat nominee given the opposition it’s those on the fence you need to attract.Not sure trying to make it about race or gender will work out for the Democrats. No suggestion they will of course but some posters seem to be focusing on that.
I'll go back to my first point since this news dropped. Biden was chosen as their nominee last time because he was appealing to voters who could just as easily have voted for Trump. He had the "Murica" factor.
Don't see what's so heroic. He was heading for defeat and is 81.Hats off to him, any politician that puts their country ahead of their own career deseves a lot of credit.