Fully Fledged
Full Member
Yeah you can go back and find loads of examples. The thing is that people had made reasons why they were acceptable until now.
Daenerys burning an innocent man alive, season 5...
Yeah you can go back and find loads of examples. The thing is that people had made reasons why they were acceptable until now.
Daenerys burning an innocent man alive, season 5...
This shit is too easy.Think we've solved another case Lambs.
Far too emotional and hystericalIt just proves that women arent fit for leadership roles.
Lets just do both. Shit is easy.This shit is too easy.
We should either become Screen writers (R&R) or open our own detective agency!
Mate no matter what you try to dig up it's not going to make her burning down the entire city any less ludicrous. I'm not even against Dany being a somewhat morally ambiguous character when it comes to justice. She also crucified a feckload of nobles without even stopping to think if any of them might have been decent people. But the context of both examples you've given me are completely different to what she just did. How about instead of throwing up quotes/clips, why don't you at least attempt to make a bit of an argument for Dany's actions?
Daenerys burning an innocent man alive, season 5...
And we can't even be sure it wasn't a certain time of the month.Far too emotional and hysterical
You got any phsyics equations to back that up chief?Dragonfire doesn't melt stone beams.
No, it was done and foreshadowed both in the TV show and books since they started and will rightfully be the end to both. It was obvious she was always stuck between two minds of ending tyranny and her own worst impulses coming out. Her advisors stopped her from making similar atrocities plenty of times throughout the show, now her advisors are either dead or lost her trust.Mate no matter what you try to dig up it's not going to make her burning down the entire city any less ludicrous. I'm not even against Dany being a somewhat morally ambiguous character when it comes to justice. She also crucified a feckload of nobles without even stopping to think if any of them might have been decent people. But the context of both examples you've given me are completely different to what she just did. How about instead of throwing up quotes/clips, why don't you at least attempt to make a bit of an argument for Dany's actions?
It wasn't one of justice (as you showed me in the clip), it wasn't one of vengeance (as you quoted), it was an attempt to rule through fear to hold onto her crown because she was scared Jon would take it. Now, I know she's wanted the Iron Throne for a long time, but considering she's spent 7 seasons talking about how she wants to rid the world of Tyrant and rule through peace, attempting to hold onto a crown with the greatest act of tyranny we've seen in the whole series is contrived writing inconsistent with her character. It was all done to give us this big amazing spectacle of burning Kings Landing, that's all.
We last saw him carrying King Robert on the fatal hunt.
Which explains why the poor thing still looks so battered![]()
what? really the same horse?
I know, it just felt all weird. Specially all the scorpions placed on King's Landing walls.I thought she was strategically attacking with the sun on her back and right on top of the ships which made it harder for the scorpions to be oriented and aimed well. I could be wrong though.
Thing is, I actually like the idea of the hero becoming the greatest villain, but I don't see how the books can pull this off without it still seeming inconsistent. The only explanation would be madness.No, it was done and foreshadowed both in the TV show and books since they started and will rightfully be the end to both. It was obvious she was always stuck between two minds of ending tyranny and her own worst impulses coming out. Her advisors stopped her from making similar atrocities plenty of times throughout the show, now her advisors are either dead or lost her trust.
It could have been better done like it will in the books since it's a much easier medium to portray somethign like this and there isn't an episode or budget limit to extend the story for as long as it needed to be extended to make it feel more natural. The idea that it came out of nowhere is bullshit though.
This is fair, I think it's the level of her destruction that people think is over the top. That has come out of nowhere in my opinion. Its the sheer level of destruction she unleashed that people don't feel is right for her character. At least in the show anyway. No idea if she's done more Evil shit in the books.It could have been better done like it will in the books since it's a much easier medium to portray something like this and there isn't an episode or budget limit to extend the story for as long as it needed to be extended to make it feel more natural. The idea that it came out of nowhere is bullshit though.
She could have attacked the Red Keep destroying Cersei and not caring about collateral damage to the thousands that Cersei kept around her to put off such an attack. That would have shown a determined Dany being morally ambiguous and somewhat tyrannical.This is fair, I think it's the level of her destruction that people think is over the top. That has come out of nowhere in my opinion. Its the sheer level of destruction she unleashed that people don't feel is right for her character. At least in the show anyway. No idea if she's done more Evil shit in the books.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Im of the same opinion. The cynical side of me thinks the writers needed the city to be in flames so they could have Aryas Reporting down at Street level and the only explanation they had for the entire city to be up in flames was for Daenerys to go batshit mad. It makes more sense from her characters perspective to burn the Red Keep down. She did the same with the masters when she freed the Unsullied, she did the same with the Dothraki masters when she got the Dothraki horde. The tactic of going for the leaders has worked for her in the past so why not continue doing so? If nothing else, it's a symbolic gesture for her 'breaking the wheel'.She could have attacked the Red Keep destroying Cersei and not caring about collateral damage to the thousands that Cersei kept around her to put off such an attack. But she is literally just flying around burning peasants for shits and giggles. It was way, way too much. Mostly felt gratuitous for shock value tbh.
Yeah, I agree with this part.She could have attacked the Red Keep destroying Cersei and not caring about collateral damage to the thousands that Cersei kept around her to put off such an attack. That would have shown a determined Dany being morally ambiguous and somewhat tyrannical.
But she is literally just flying around burning peasants for shits and giggles. It was way, way too much, it's just straight up evil. Mostly felt gratuitous for shock value tbh.
Seems pretty obvious at this juncture thatI think they are setting her up to die and be easily accepted by the fans, it's easier to kill her if she is seen as pure evil
I ve been wanting to ask those of you who say this - what in your opinion would ve been a satisfying death for Cersei?Such an unsatisfying episode, particularly the death of Cersei. For the biggest villain in the show to go like that, and for them to try and make us sympathetic for her is just so ill thought out.
Exactly.Yeah you can go back and find loads of examples. The thing is that people had made reasons why they were acceptable until now.
Probably yeahSeems pretty obvious at this juncture that
Jon's gonna kill her.
And in doing so won't end up King.Seems pretty obvious at this juncture that
Jon's gonna kill her.
Relied on his plot armour.Also why is Grey Worm fighting without his helmet? Not the most secure thing to do
She's a 3-dimensional character. Of course she's going to be a shade of grey.Such an unsatisfying episode, particularly the death of Cersei. For the biggest villain in the show to go like that, and for them to try and make us sympathetic for her is just so ill thought out.
She obviously put headphones on Drogon with a looped recording of her saying it... DuhSo did Dany have to say "dracarys" a thousand times whilst riding around on the dragon or did he just know to burn everything to the ground?
Plot armour couldn't save Jorah or Jaime.Relied on his plot armour.
Anally raped by the mountain with the blood of Jaime on his hands.I ve been wanting to ask those of you who say this - what in your opinion would ve been a satisfying death for Cersei?
Really? I thought he was deflecting the blows with his mean face.Relied on his plot armour.
Jaime killing her would have been the most poetic outcome. Or Arya. Or Tyrion. Or one of the Cleganes. So many possibilities.I ve been wanting to ask those of you who say this - what in your opinion would ve been a satisfying death for Cersei?
The throne should still be there, if Daenerys' vision from Qarth (?) is true.Also, the Iron Throne is gone now I guess?
So in the Game of Thrones, the throne lost.
It didn't come off as a shade of grey to me though, still wanted her to die and felt no sympathy when she did. Maybe I am the baddie after all.She's a 3-dimensional character. Of course she's going to be a shade of grey.
Am I the only who finds the whole dracarys thing a bit lame?So did Dany have to say "dracarys" a thousand times whilst riding around on the dragon or did he just know to burn everything to the ground?