Martial aside the majority of the attack is sufficiently experienced I'd say to not need Rooney. And Rooney's experience doesn't really cover for his drawbacks. I thought Bournemouth was actually a really good showcase of the good and bad of Rooney. When the game was really open he was decent and moved the ball in to space well enough. Once it got tighter he struggled. Personally can't see many teams being as open as Bournemouth were.
That's your opinion and I respect it but imo(which is a big minority) Rooney isn't as bad as people make out. Like I said in the post below, I don't think he should still be with us next season but I think in a situation like this when we need someone to replace the leadership and experience of Ibra to lead the line, I think he's the man.
Loosing Ibra is a blow and one I think that Mou has left us exposed too. Despite a fair few opportunities to give Rashford time up front when we've been ahead in matches we didn't take the chances/have played Ibra in so many games that he's not really in the ideal form/confidence to step up to the role. Hopefully, if he does get the nod over Rooney which I doubt, he'll step back in well. In some ways I think if he does play even if he isn't quite as sharp as we'd want, his ability to stretch the game/run the channels will open space for the players behind him in a way that Ibra doesn't really do as much.
I agree Rahford should have got more game time upfront, obviously in less important games but it would still have given Mourinho some indication of how he would do in that position. Now this leaves us vulnerable in Ibras absence. Regarding Rashford upfront, I think the biggest problem would be not being able to make the ball stick upfront and less possession because of it.
Last edited: