emaveric
Full Member
Is he any better compare to Sterling?
10m for an English player isnt much of a gamble.
Jarvis cost West Ham over 10m after Wolves were relegated.
Unless he is an absolute disaster, we'll get most if not all our money back in the future..
And a lot of people seem to rate him very highly. He'll probably do pretty well for us.
Is he any better compare to Sterling?
10m (potentially rising to 15m) is pretty expensive for a Championship player, and we have the numbers of English players so I don't see the need of signing English players just for the sake of it. If we can sign better players from outside with those money then why not.
For rating him highly by some people, I just don't buy it. The same happened with Ince some months ago when we were interested on him. Some people jumped and you would have thought that he is Ronaldinho reincarnated, well now that we are not interested he is obviously shit.
Saying all that, I haven't seen much of him, so I don't know what will become of him. Hopefully he will turn a good signing whihc is very likely considering that we have scouted him for some time. Anyway, him replacing Nani doesn't sound appealing to me and most likely is not the case. If Nani will go in summer I would like to replace him with someone like Gotze/Rodriguez/Isco/Muniain (not because they are not English and have better names, we all know that that is bullshit but because they are very good players). Anyway, I don't think that we will lose anything at all from this signing (cause we can sell him for some money in the future) while there is always the possibility of getting a bargain like in Chicha/Smalling case. So, hopefully the deal will agree soon.
It's is unbelievable how much bullshit these papers and their writers spout.
Apparently, we are pushing for the deal because Young is out for a month with a knee injury and we are short of numbers on the wings. But, we'll also let him stay at Palace for the rest of the season..
What????
Is he any better compare to Sterling?
This kid must be good his price seems to rise 20% daily - could teach the stockbrokers a thing or two!
Is he any better compare to Sterling?
Is he any better compare to Sterling?
We couldn't afford the likes of Götze and Rodriguez, or could but wouldn't pay the price Borussia and Porto are going to ask for. Besides, in Götze's case it'd be virtually impossible to buy him as he's very likely to stay at Dortmund for much longer.
Zaha is a completely different type of signing. He's going to cost much less long term, fee and wages included, than any of them. Fee is just one of the factors, in an era when players earn £100k+ a week on a regular basis it tends to contribute less to a transfer cost than wages do.
Instead we have Nani + Zaha. What if Goetze didnt adapt to England? And what if Rodriguez wasnt what you had seen in youtube videos?
Now I'll have to start watching the Championship on streams. Bugger.
If they get Powell too then I'll have to watch all their games this season..
£15 million
How much would Sterling as the younger and better player cost? £30 million?
Overpaid but I imagine that was due to other clubs showing interest.
It's £10mil rising to £15mil. You'd imagine the only way it would reach the higher figure would be if he was a success, meaning it will have been money well spent.
And if he's not a success?
And if he's not a success?
And if he's not a success?
if we can wait till the summer we don't really need him save the money and spend it on a central midfielder