It was certainly an unprecedented opportunity to rob people blind. Biggest theft from taxpayers that we'll probably ever see. And not a single person behind bars for it.
Westminster Politics
- Thread starter altodevil
- Start date
It was certainly an unprecedented opportunity to rob people blind. Biggest theft from taxpayers that we'll probably ever see. And not a single person behind bars for it.
I am not a Tory voter because I will dig out my ID and head to the polls to put Labour in the polling box.
You are a Tory apologizer because you are accusing a Labour leader of threatening to become the face of Toryism for which you will actively vote in the Tories (by not voting) so as to stop that nasty Labour man from becoming a Tory.
My consistency elected the greens last time and its been an unmitigated disaster, during a cost of living crisis the idiots spent £1,000,000 + on trees in planters throughout hightown, and put them in a bunch of the few existing parking spaces, and another £1,000,000 on 500 yards of cycle lane that goes the wrong way up a one way street, and just spits out into traffic at both ends
https://www.versobooks.com/en-gb/bl...ions-la-fabrique-paris-and-verso-books-london
British justice in action.
The fact that anyone can believe a word Starmer says after he back tracked on his leadership pledges is evidence of naivety.
A shop was ransacked during riots, someone decided to walk in to it and take goods.
They were prosecuted because a crime had been committed, both theft and burglary carry sentences that can go over 16 months. A Home Office decision on immigration is separate to the CPS.
Of course the book on Starmer would also have pointed out details leading to sentencing in order to not mislead:
"Anderson Fernandes He is aged 21 and pleaded Guilty to Burglary at the bakery, Patiserrie Valerie. He had been in the Manchester to attend a hearing at the Magistrates’ Court and stayed in the city
4centre when he saw the disorder developing. He found himself in St Annes’s Square and went into the bakery which had been broken into by others. He helped himself to an ice cream and thought about handing out cones to the crowd. He also pleaded Guilty to Handling a Dyson vacuum cleaner which was found still in its box at his home. This is unrelated to the current disorder. He has previous convictions, Violent Disorder in April 2009 for which he received a Community Order which he breached in July 2009. Common Assault and Assault S47 in February 2010 for which he received another Community Order which he breached in May
2010. The offence itself is at the lower end of the range in terms of gravity but his position is aggravated by his previous convictions. I can find no reason to go below the 2 year starting point in his case. The appropriate sentence therefore is 16 months for the offence of burglary. There will be a concurrent sentence of 3 months for the offence of handling the vacuum cleaner.''
But of course "Starmer got him deported for a lick of ice cream that he then gave away."
Nothing to do with a history of violent convictions and non-compliance with non custodial sentences, as well as thinking to loot right after attending court about another offence.
They were prosecuted because a crime had been committed, both theft and burglary carry sentences that can go over 16 months. A Home Office decision on immigration is separate to the CPS.
Of course the book on Starmer would also have pointed out details leading to sentencing in order to not mislead:
"Anderson Fernandes He is aged 21 and pleaded Guilty to Burglary at the bakery, Patiserrie Valerie. He had been in the Manchester to attend a hearing at the Magistrates’ Court and stayed in the city
4centre when he saw the disorder developing. He found himself in St Annes’s Square and went into the bakery which had been broken into by others. He helped himself to an ice cream and thought about handing out cones to the crowd. He also pleaded Guilty to Handling a Dyson vacuum cleaner which was found still in its box at his home. This is unrelated to the current disorder. He has previous convictions, Violent Disorder in April 2009 for which he received a Community Order which he breached in July 2009. Common Assault and Assault S47 in February 2010 for which he received another Community Order which he breached in May
2010. The offence itself is at the lower end of the range in terms of gravity but his position is aggravated by his previous convictions. I can find no reason to go below the 2 year starting point in his case. The appropriate sentence therefore is 16 months for the offence of burglary. There will be a concurrent sentence of 3 months for the offence of handling the vacuum cleaner.''
But of course "Starmer got him deported for a lick of ice cream that he then gave away."
Nothing to do with a history of violent convictions and non-compliance with non custodial sentences, as well as thinking to loot right after attending court about another offence.
Last edited:
Not seen that comparison before. Honestly Sunak comes across as more polished than Starmer. I can see why his personal ratings are so much higher than the Tories. Shades of John Major in 1992?
The fact you consider looting a trivial offence following mass national disorder is more worrying.
I don't really see how anyone can argue that the BBC isn't a propaganda arm for the Tories when the leading headline on the BBC News app is literally them quoting an attack line from a Conservative Party press release almost unedited. It's absolutely blatant.
That doesn't sound dissimilar to how Labour have managed the city centre to be fair, in fact some of those examples are exactly the same... see Northern Quarter cycle lanes for details. No way the Greens get in here, I'd rather just give a vote elsewhere than not vote at all.
Particularly when he left out the fact that the offender had a history of offences including violent disorder, ABH, common assault and handling stolen goods while also not complying with non-custodial sentences.
Agree. For all their reactionary little Englander stuff, Sunak reminds me of more a US democrat than anything in the current Tory Party(He did spend a good amount of time in the America).
Will be interesting to see what happens during election campaigning and tv interviews/debates. Tbh even putting aside Starmer shift in politics just on a pure presentation level Starmer has got worse since 2019.
It's bad when Sunak is seen is a charisma void post-Johnson, but still has more charisma and charm than Starmer.
Good ol brexit, imagine screwing yourself over with cost of living because you don't like dark skined foreigners...
Actions have consequences, you need to feel the pain to avoid repeated mistakes. The (largely white, and some dickheaded brown
) pensioners that voted for this will now not be eating well.Darwinism.
I had never seen the Suella Braverman video until now. Fecking outrageous comment. If I said something like that, I would be sacked on the spot and rightfully so.
I am boiling.
I am boiling.
You guys see the latest inflation data? We deserve this pain.
Still over 10% in the UK while it’s under 7% in the eurozone. What’s the difference? It’s an obvious question to put to Hunt or Sunak as they can’t blame the war in Ukraine or Covid.
The crazy thing about it is that inflation should be taking care of itself. Inflation being the measurement of price growth rather than the measurement of price itself - nobody expects things to get cheaper - that would be deflation but Sunak had been counting on inflation to burn out naturally, because that’s what it does - only apparently it’s not.
Food is at 19%. Those are emerging market kind of figures.
I had never seen the Suella Braverman video until now. Fecking outrageous comment. If I said something like that, I would be sacked on the spot and rightfully so.
I am boiling.
She is vile beyond belief. I thought Patel was bad.
Yet they still will as well as people asking for wage rises.
Unions are going to dig their heels in.
Is Lindsay Hoyle the worst speaker that the house has ever had?
There's been alot of talk in recent years about how there is a clear lack of respect and dignity in the commons these days and it's no coincidence that it coincides with Lindsay Hoyles reign.
Just catching up on PMQ again today and the house is out of control as usual and Lindsay sits there laughing alongside the tory bench.
Warning after warning comes but he never does shit. Makes my blood boil watching PMQs.
Starmer performed well today in my opinion.
There's been alot of talk in recent years about how there is a clear lack of respect and dignity in the commons these days and it's no coincidence that it coincides with Lindsay Hoyles reign.
Just catching up on PMQ again today and the house is out of control as usual and Lindsay sits there laughing alongside the tory bench.
Warning after warning comes but he never does shit. Makes my blood boil watching PMQs.
Starmer performed well today in my opinion.
I think someone is itching to get the teas in! Keep that up, Mr Hatchetman, and I'll be requesting some biscuits as well!
Prime Minister!
He's absolutely spineless, but tbf before this current crop of tories, politicians in this country at least respected convention and the like. So it's hard to compare him to past speakers apart from Bercow really who had a very different way of handling it. Our lack of a written constitution means that people who ignore tradition and convention can get away with an awful lot with a parliamentary majority
Hoyle is interested in one thing and one thing only and that’s a nice seat in the House of Lords when he retires. He has absolutely zero motivation to upset those that have the power to put him in that position.
Number 1:
Number 2:
Number 2:
She’s incredibly thick.
On the contrary, she sounds very thin skinned.
They've probably got Liam Neeson walking up and down high streets looking for any cars parked up with disabled badges to wait beside until their owners come back so he can absolutely leather them.