Fluctuation0161
Full Member
You trust the motives of our corrupt government? Bless.Or maybe it's because the country needs more homes for people to live in?
You trust the motives of our corrupt government? Bless.Or maybe it's because the country needs more homes for people to live in?
Wasn't there talk of him defecting to Labour years ago?
Is Cummings ultra conservative!? He seems pretty apolitical to me who just wanted money to fund the U.K. version of DARPA.I don't like much of Cummings' politics but he isn't wrong about the media class proliferating nonsense for a living. His primary fault is his egoism and his ultra conservative ideology but he isn't an idiot.
He designed the Brexit campaign and was the man behind "Get Brexit Done". He's definitely conservative in UK terms. I mean he is a complete Tory. He is also clearly quite liberal but I don't mean he isn't liberal when I say he is conservative.Is Cummings ultra conservative!? He seems pretty apolitical to me who just wanted money to fund the U.K. version of DARPA.
I'm not someone to complain about being on the wrong side of a few arbitrary rules resulting from covid. But my kids move up to secondary school this year. They are now not allowed to attend mutiple planned events, designed to help ease them into a new school they have never been to. It can be a difficult period for kids, even without the current situation and it seems like they've had the shitty end of the stick too many times over the last year.
So yeah, I'd say I have a problem with this. While not a massive issue, it's yet another case of allowances being made for those with high wealth, while the rest just have to get on with it. The UK isn't completely out of the woods yet. By my understanding, we're relying upon the vaccine programme continuing at a strong pace to stay ahead of this latest wave(to put it simply). Taking more risks now, only increases the chances of further lockdowns or continuing restrictions past next month.
You trust the motives of our corrupt government? Bless.
You think the proposed changes in housing policy are because we need more homes?wtf are you on about
Are you denying there is a lack of homes for people to live in?
You think the proposed changes in housing policy are because we need more homes?
Very naive, at best.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...-cash-favours-cabinet-secretary-a9567121.html
Oh give over, you. Are you denying there is a housing shortage in the UK?
The people in Amersham and Chesham are Tory through and through. It's a clear NIMBY vote.
The same way that Socialists in Northern constituencies voted Tory because they're a bunch of fecking racists at heart.
Can someone explain how the feck the Tories are ahead here and fecking Galloway the cnut thrown in as well. Labour will need Lib Dem’s to vote tactically.
You do love to generalise.
It is always said that there is a housing shortage and has been for many decades.
There may be a shortage of so called affordable housing.
But the rate of house building has gone up significantly in the last few years.
The biggest problem is that we are building some of the smallest houses in Europe and as a result, families need to move to bigger houses which they struggle to afford.
You do love to generalise.
It is always said that there is a housing shortage and has been for many decades.
There may be a shortage of so called affordable housing.
But the rate of house building has gone up significantly in the last few years.
The biggest problem is that we are building some of the smallest houses in Europe and as a result, families need to move to bigger houses which they struggle to afford.
there are upwards of 700k empty homes in the UK.
There is lots of affordable housing, but it’s not in the areas that many want it to be.
Wait what? Not doubting you but that figure seems massive.
it is massive. It’s hugely unreported. One of the biggest issues that most of these properties are in a poor state of repair. The focus has been on new housing. So if you were a first time bitter without the required deposit, there is govt. help but only to buy new properties. In effect propping up the big house builders.
Very few incentives to bring back houses in disrepair back into the housing stock.
Wasn't there talk of him defecting to Labour years ago?
Landlords owning tens or hundreds of unaffordable houses in poor states of repair doesn't help either. Obviously nothing wrong with landlord/renter situations but there's sometimes very little incentive for the landlord to be responsible. And before anyone mentions bad tenants, there's plenty of incentive for them not to be twats - it's their only home - but if they're high, irredeemable twats, or have mental health problems or whatever, then they're likely not thinking about the future.
having a private rental sector is essential for mobility. Like anything, there are good and bad landlords.
i think there was a post in here about a housing association - which are often much worse than a small landlord.
its actually these small landlords that are in the best place to bring back into circulation the empty houses.
Many owner occupiers can’t afford or don’t want a ‘do upper’, and there’s not enough money in it for bigger developers.
For sure, I'm just saying that there are plenty of these types of landlord who don't give a feck about the houses and still make plenty of money anyway. That should be disincentivised in some way ideally.
with Section 24 and the introduction of EICRs - it’s getting closer towards ‘professional’ landlords.
it’s ironic with these types of landlords, that spending money on repairs and maintenance correlates to higher rents and better tenants. Many fail to see the bigger picture.
there are upwards of 700k empty homes in the UK.
There is lots of affordable housing, but it’s not in the areas that many want it to be.
Bingo - in France a room is not classified as a bedroom unless it is 9m2 so a four bedroom shoebox in the UK would generally be classed as a 2 bedroom house with cupboards
True. Better than it was no doubt. I suspect the problem is more enforcement - court cases take forever these days, and inspections of properties pretty much just aren't a thing.
I know examples of landlords that apply for HMO licences. They essentially are allowed to operate as an HMO prior to an inspection, yet the wait for inspections is more than 2 years. You can get fined up to £10k per offence operating as a HMO - so the framework is there, just no one to implement it.
on the other side of things, hearings to evict tenants who haven’t paid rent are not being heard for over 12 months in some places.
there is very little enforcement on either side of the fence to remedy bad landlords or bad tenants.
there is very little enforcement on either side of the fence to remedy bad landlords or bad tenants.
there's obviously a balance to be had, nobody likes too much intrusion into their lives, but there's no point having rules that only the good people follow.
Except for both parties involved, its not at the top of the list for urgent action for anyone else !
Isn't that the situation in most cases, we have a whole category of citizenship where rules such as "keep off the grass", "no parking" etc. believe it doesn't apply to them.
Its a problem for those involved of course, but I am not holding my breath that any 'enforcement' will occur except what naturally occurs over time, which of course is something neither landlords nor tenants have!So you agree it's a problem then? I'm confused, do you think the rules should be enforced or not?
Probably hoping now for a labour pm and switching alleigence so he can get a cushy number at the house of lords
Its a problem for those involved of course, but I am not holding my breath that any 'enforcement' will occur except what naturally occurs over time, which of course is something neither landlords nor tenants have!
The second point I was making is that there are many areas where people flout the rules, or fail to adhere to them, and don't even recognise these apply to them, and even for the criminal ones there is little in the way of enforcement happening.
It is my opinion that this situation pertains because what are rules/laws/personal views and opinions are now merging and resulting in a psychosis affecting the nation, due mainly to social media echo chambers..... and to a lack of 'enforcers'.
Yes I would say its a silly convention but even more petty to break it ...Both disgusting and completely predictable that he wasn't elevated to the Lords after he ended as Speaker anyway. Tory twats just ignore convention any time it suits.
Robert Halfon, education select committee chairman, dismissed "divisive concepts like 'white privilege' that pit one group against another".
Oh give over, you. Are you denying there is a housing shortage in the UK?.
They also gloss over the reason that the pupils are on food tokens. A large portion of the ethnic students will be immigrants or first generation and their families are still setting up social networks. Some of the white students they are talking about are from families of 5 or 6 generations who haven't worked. Totally different reasons for poverty and totally different opportunities and routes out.Poorer white pupils neglected for decades, say MPs https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-57558746
Nothing to do with years of cuts and lack of funding……
...OK lets leave it there, hope it doesn't give you nightmaresThis all sounds a bit mad in fairness.
That's a Bill Burr bit!And saying that white privilege doesn't exist means that they don't understand what white privilege is, which from a senior government body is fecking scary.
It's almost pathetic, isn't it, the lengths they are prepared to go to. The reasoning seems to be white privilege doesn't exist because some white kids are underprivileged.They also gloss over the reason that the pupils are on food tokens. A large portion of the ethnic students will be immigrants or first generation and their families are still setting up social networks. Some of the white students they are talking about are from families of 5 or 6 generations who haven't worked. Totally different reasons for poverty and totally different opportunities and routes out.
And saying that white privilege doesn't exist means that they don't understand what white privilege is, which from a senior government body is fecking scary.