This isn't their faults though. It's the courts. The rule of law has no place sticking it's nose into political decisions. Down with the courts. Up the Johnson!You have to admire the party's ability to always look dysfunctional.
.......
This isn't their faults though. It's the courts. The rule of law has no place sticking it's nose into political decisions. Down with the courts. Up the Johnson!You have to admire the party's ability to always look dysfunctional.
Actually meant for the Corbyn thread.This isn't their faults though. It's the courts. The rule of law has no place sticking it's nose into political decisions. Down with the courts. Up the Johnson!
.......
Ah, same sort of applies I guess.Actually meant for the Corbyn thread.
I think it would have to be headed by somebody who wont stand (at least for PM) next election - ken clarke?How would a GNU work? By this I mean, how would you make Corbyn and Swinson play ball?
I assume it would be strictly time limited.
- 2nd referendum on brexit
- Revoke loan charge
- ???
- What else?
You have to admire the party's ability to always look dysfunctional.
No, the PM is entitled to 3 days notice of any question, so there can't be any.As it is Wednesday tomorrow
And as Parliament is sitting
Will there be a PMQ's
Wonder if he will even be pm by next week.No, the PM is entitled to 3 days notice of any question, so there can't be any.
Wonder if he will even be pm by next week.
... This would suggest so
Which is why I'm surprised they are not going with an immediate confidence motion .... Guess Corbyn does not want the humiliation of not being able to form a governmentSo as I said earlier, who is going to ask for an extension? Boris says he isn't whatever acts have been passed telling him to do so. Even if he did he could attach something impossible for the EU to consider.
Letting Boris flail cluelessly looks quite effective for the moment.Which is why I'm surprised they are not going with an immediate confidence motion .... Guess Corbyn does not want the humiliation of not being able to form a government
Perhaps Boris will call a confidence motion in himself?
3 weeks is a long time to string it out though... It could very quickly look like putting party politics first if labour overplay their handLetting Boris flail cluelessly looks quite effective for the moment.
Yeah. Gotta play it by ear.3 weeks is a long time to string it out though... It could very quickly look like putting party politics first if labour overplay their hand
So as I said earlier, who is going to ask for an extension? Boris says he isn't whatever acts have been passed telling him to do so. Even if he did he could attach something impossible for the EU to consider.
Quite likely, yes.What, and break the law again? It's already been made clear that such an idea is not permissible.
Boris Johnson has been given 14 days to give details of his relationship with a US businesswoman, following claims he failed to declare a potential conflict of interest when he was London mayor.
A committee that scrutinises the mayor's spending has asked for details "of all contact" with Jennifer Arcuri.
The Sunday Times said Ms Arcuri joined trade missions he led and received thousands in sponsorship grants.
Mr Johnson has said everything was done "entirely in the proper way".
Ms Arcuri told the paper any grants she received and any trade missions she joined were "were purely in respect of my role as a legitimate businesswoman".
PM defends actions over conflict of interest claims
In a letter addressed to Mr Johnson and dated 23 September, Len Duvall, chairman of the London Assembly GLA (Greater London Assembly) Oversight Committee, said he wanted the "details and a timeline of all contact" with Ms Arcuri "including social, personal and professional during his period of office as Mayor of London".
He also asked for "an explanation of how that alleged personal relationship was disclosed and taken into account in any and all dealings with the GLA".
The committee has the legal power to summon Mr Johnson to appear before it for questioning and has done once before - when it quizzed him over the failed Garden Bridge project in 2018.
Can’t wait til Kuenssberg has to report on this
funnily enough i just read her blog and she doesn't seem quite the same, She almost defends him in a non committal way.Can’t wait til Kuenssberg has to report on this
Given his personal electoral limitations, I think Corbyn has played a blinder so far.Which is why I'm surprised they are not going with an immediate confidence motion .... Guess Corbyn does not want the humiliation of not being able to form a government
Perhaps Boris will call a confidence motion in himself?
I noticed that in 6 o’clock news. She looked smashed and dejected, lost that cute girly glint in her eye. The push back from last week has done its job.funnily enough i just read her blog and she doesn't seem quite the same, She almost defends him in a non committal way.
Only until people forget about it, which won't take long.I noticed that in 6 o’clock news. She looked smashed and dejected, lost that cute girly glint in her eye. The push back from last week has done its job.
I've been thinking about elections and GNU's etc quite a bit and the following seems to hold true -
1) For every party except for the tories and lib dems, a referendum before an election would be preferable.
2) For the 'independent' tories resigning at the next election like Soames and Clarke, this is also the preferred outcome
3) For both Boris and Swinson, it would be an absolute disaster.
4) Corbyn is in a peculiar position. It's good for his party to delay, but not so good for him personally; they could viably move against him in 6 months.
5) Foreign policy would cause tensions.
I can see it happening, but it's a bit touchy.
Well apart from the polls showing Boris is still more popular than Corbyn... And indeed Corbyn has even surpassed foot in the unpopularity polls.Given his personal electoral limitations, I think Corbyn has played a blinder so far.
Everything has gone his way since BJ came to power.
Hammond as chancellor? ... On the basis of no changes till there is a referendum and he's done the job recentlyOk so I tried to vaguely sketch out what a GNU may look like...
Harman: PM (less controversy than clarke over past voting to Labour/SNP, and possibly on her way to speakers bench anyway as independent)
Clarke: Foreign Secretary - Hugely well known and liked
Grieve: Attorney General
Starmer: Brexit Secretary
Home Secretary: ??? A corbyn loyalist perhaps ???
Chancellor: Very tough one, essentially a technicrat job in a short term GNU.
Where do the SNP and lib dems slot into these front seat slots? Very tough
Business for Wednesday 25 September 2019
SUMMARY AGENDA: CHAMBER
11.30am
Prayers
Afterwards
Urgent Questions, Ministerial Statements (if any)
BUSINESS TODAY: CHAMBER
11.30am Prayers
Followed by
URGENT QUESTIONS AND STATEMENTS
Urgent Questions (if any)
Ministerial Statements (if any)
Hammond as chancellor? ... On the basis of no changes till there is a referendum and he's done the job recently
Think Clarke would be the choice for pm and his odds are dropping at the bookies to be next pm ... That said he could be an option as chancellor as well
Clarke is 2nd fave for next pm (after Corbyn)
I've been thinking about elections and GNU's etc quite a bit and the following seems to hold true -
1) For every party except for the tories and lib dems, a referendum before an election would be preferable.
2) For the 'independent' tories resigning at the next election like Soames and Clarke, this is also the preferred outcome
3) For both Boris and Swinson, it would be an absolute disaster.
4) Corbyn is in a peculiar position. It's good for his party to delay, but not so good for him personally; they could viably move against him in 6 months.
5) Foreign policy would cause tensions.
I can see it happening, but it's a bit touchy.
comedy gold which will play well to his echo chamber.what the feck from Cox? 'this parliament has no right to sit on these green benches' 'it is a disgrace'
This from a law officer. What on earth?
There's many a reason why a referendum is not workable without a GE first. There's no majority in parliament for a referendum act. Because it's not just about the concept of the referendum only, but the question in it.
Lib Dems and SNP would support a referendum of May's Deal vs Remain. Corbyn might, but he wants his own deal so unsure. Hard Brexiteers would call that a betrayal because
a) it could reverse previous result before it's taken place and
b) they see it as Remain vs BINO (Brexit in name only) removing the option of "clean break"
The Tories could perhaps coalesce around a referendum of May's Deal vs No-Deal. But there's no way LibLabSNP would lend support for that. There would be no compromise between these sides.
Even if LibLabSNP + Indies succeed in passing an act for Remain vs May's Deal referendum, the Tories and Farage would simply ask brexiteers to abstain to undermine its legitimacy. Then promise to ignore the result if they get reelected since it's only an advisory referendum, against their agreement, that has been undermined as well. Parliament can't bind it's successor anyways.
So really we need a GE and a parliamentary majority first, in order to return to some semblance of normality.
comedy gold which will play well to his echo chamber.
which were the comedic bits?comedy gold which will play well to his echo chamber.
Was an appalling display.what the feck from Cox? 'this parliament has no right to sit on these green benches' 'it is a disgrace'
This from a law officer. What on earth?
Fortunately we don't live in a world where politicians are targets for violence otherwise his words might cause someone to, I don't know, kill a sitting MP.what the feck from Cox? 'this parliament has no right to sit on these green benches' 'it is a disgrace'
This from a law officer. What on earth?
We absolutely don't need a GE before a referendum. Assuming there is a majority under a GNU [and I think there is now], the technical issues can be resolved.
- They don't need the brexiteers.
- A referendum doesn't need to be advisory
- A simple revoke on the result of a remain victory would take under a day to complete before handing over for a GE. Mays deal would take a month or so, and no deal wouldn't take long
As I said above, this makes sense for every party except for the tories and the lib dems.