That is what I thought. Very clever of them.
Westminster Politics 2024-2029
- Thread starter Pexbo
- Start date
That is what I thought. Very clever of them.
She usually waits to be told what to say.
She still managed to be snidey to Davey 'Congratulations, I suppose'.
This would be known in the UK as unelected bureaucrats in the EU.
It was against international law and would never have happened under whoever was in charge (who was sane).
There's no way Starmer's going to break international law.
Is Starmer ending any other silly tory policies?
Yes, he could, if Starmer cannot stop the boats ...completely!
However, will Hunt be prepared to take on the challenge of vying for the Tory leadership, if e.g. Starmer is seen to be following his recent PM predecessors and failing in what is now becoming seen as a British PM's 'test of strength'... or will that herculean task of slaying the dragon-boats fall to Farage?... tune in twelve months from now to find out the answer.
Boats brainwashing?
Yes, he could, if Starmer cannot stop the boats ...completely!
However, will Hunt be prepared to take on the challenge of vying for the Tory leadership, if e.g. Starmer is seen to be following his recent PM predecessors and failing in what is now becoming seen as a British PM's 'test of strength'... or will that herculean task of slaying the dragon-boats fall to Farage?... tune in twelve months from now to find out the answer.
As hateful as Hunt is, he's not a nutter like Cruella. He's very capable and good at being a minister. Cruella is just shit at everything and nasty to boot. I saw Jenrick this morning and he looks like a snake of a man. They really are having to scrape the bottom of the barrel.
He clearly said boats brainwashing and I challenge you to find a single boat that has been subjected to conversion therapy or radicalisation since Starmer stepped into post.
I suspect there's some in the NHS who might disagree
I didn't realise until now that the new Business Secretary is part of the Co-op Party and Unite the Union. Pro workers and green energy, as well as responsible capitalism. I'm actually surprised by this as it seems like the sort of move Corbyn would've made (and he would've been massacred by the Mail for it).
Edit: his Wiki is interesting if any of you care - the word "socialist" crops up a lot. I forgot he was one of Corbyn's guys so it doesn't look like Starmer has really truly shut that part of the party out. Keep it coming.
Last edited:
It wasn't nutty policy from him, it was cruel policy. He clearly wants to destroy it in order to monetise it, as do all of them in that party.
You're like the J.K Rowling of the boat world
I hadn't seen that much of Jenrick until today, he's got complete cnut of the first degree written all over him. I'm off to see what his odds are.
Also he abstained on the Gaza ceasefire vote.
Last edited:
If asking for single boat spaces is a crime...
He stabbed little Rishi in the back. He's absolutely shameless and so will probably go far.
I'm guessing he will position himself slightly to the left of Suella but the substance and content will be much the same.
I know a few people who've met Kemi and they've said that she's pretty thick. I don't think she's good enough on media either.
Jonathan Reynolds is a key man for Starmer, his background is a solid as you can get in the idiom of working people. Reynolds also knows that the brand of Socialism that relies on 'storming the bastille' type actions is doomed.
Reynolds has to persuade, both business and the unions to back Starmer especially in this first year, or even this first term; this will be one of the toughest jobs in cabinet as the whole Labour enterprise depends on growth and business and unions working in tandem. There will lots of 'voices off' pleading to be put first, that will try to shout loudest, but they will have to wait their turn until the 'cake' gets big enough.
I suspect Jonathan Reynolds understands what is required and what he will be up against.... he is also a rattling good constituency MP.
Reynolds has to persuade, both business and the unions to back Starmer especially in this first year, or even this first term; this will be one of the toughest jobs in cabinet as the whole Labour enterprise depends on growth and business and unions working in tandem. There will lots of 'voices off' pleading to be put first, that will try to shout loudest, but they will have to wait their turn until the 'cake' gets big enough.
I suspect Jonathan Reynolds understands what is required and what he will be up against.... he is also a rattling good constituency MP.
What is this positivity? You’ll be quoted later, oh you’ll be quoted alright
Think they suspected like most of us it wouldn't come into fruition, so it was easy money for them.
It also means repealing that legislation that declared up as down and night as day.
On the contrary.
England beating Switzerland on penalties and Lewis Hamilton winning the British GP.
He promised us change and has already delivered.
But if England lose to Holland, all bets are off
Clacton is the Florida of the UK, I won't be going there anytime soon.
I'm sure they merely meant he should go back to Southampton, which is 168 miles away from Clacton. He's not local like Nigel "128 miles away from Clacton, until he fecks off to America again for the rest of the year" Farage.
I mean, there's surely not another reason why these knuckle dragging dipshits would have a problem with a well dressed black guy who's done better than they have? Surely?
More aid to Ukraine - good.
Seeking a joint declaration with EU on wide-ranging security pact - good.
Seeking a joint declaration with EU on wide-ranging security pact - good.
I forgot what it’s like to have a government that actually does something, or at least pretends to.
Agreed but you know Reform/ the media will paint the second point as a surrender of Brexit
The online Left shocked and surprised at this
Except he did not. Did you just copy the tweet or did you read the article? They talked about an urgent need for a ceasefire, he did not call on to bring an immediate ceasefire, and also, there is nothing in the article that say it is permanent. It is gaslighting.
So we're back to the humanitarian pause vs ceasefire talk
What on earth is Keir doing here? There actually might be a danger he's going to make a lot of us look like twats. Very early days yet however.
Oh...
"gaslighting"Is this part gaslighting as well, or is there another Reddit buzzword that someone else wants to use incorrectly for dramatic effect?
Last edited: