sepulturite
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2014
- Messages
- 3,154
Ronaldo, and it's not even close.
Ronaldo, and it's not even close.
Let me shock you even further: I live in a world that understands the value of literacy. Your world might catch up some day, who knows.
If ‘literacy’ is writing nonsense like this then that’s a hard pass thanks.It speaks volumes of how utterly disruptive and shit Ronaldo was for us that I'd go with Weghorst or no one rather than having Ronaldo stinking the place up again. Added bonus since he's gone is that we don't have to put up with his legion of braindead idolaters, even if a few acolytes remain on the caf.
Yes, you can use emojis.
Weghorst is a bum.
Weghorst is a bum.
So you would rather have a player who slags off the manager and doesn’t give a shit about the club. Great stuff.
Says more about Ronaldo than Weghorse.
Not really. Ronaldo's old and has declined considerably - everyone's aware (even him). He's a bum too, still better than Weghorst.
He isn't better than Weghorst, guy could barely run without falling down.
He's perhaps a better player on the individual level. Wout's better for the team. I know which one I'd want.He is better than Weghorst, Weghorst can barely run. We have different opinions - it is what it is.
There are other reasons for our performance dropping. You are saying it is all Weghorst, I‘m calling bollocks on that.He's maybe doing better than Ronaldo was, though Ronaldo didn't play many league games. But we won 5 in a row after Ronaldo left and before weghorst, which included city away. And since weghorst we've picked up 12 points from 24, then we dropped him and we've won 2 in a row again. We were losing against Leeds at home 2-0, took him off and within 15 minutes we were level. We were losing at home against Barcelona, took him off at half time and won the game.
We definitely aren't doing better with him in the team, he just seems to have gained this reputation because of people's dislike for ronaldo
This is so dumb. The question posited to Neville regarding who he'd pick to start between them was grounded on who's the better player/who'd be best for United in sporting terms/who's more likely to bag more points/wins for United.
As an aside, I genuinely don't care if players don't give a shit about the club so long as they produce when playing.
Not really. Ronaldo's old and has declined considerably - everyone's aware (even him). He's a bum too, still better than Weghorst.
He's perhaps a better player on the individual level. Wout's better for the team. I know which one I'd want.
I'm not disputing that, but Ronaldo is also a bum.Yes, you can use emojis.
Weghorst is a bum.
You don't give a shit if someone is slagging the manager off and is whinging and whingeing at every opportunity. We were doing feck all with Ronaldo in the team this season.
I'm not disputing that, but Ronaldo is also a bum.
He's a bum too, still better than Weghorst.
Fair enough. I'm still amazed you'd have Ronaldo instead of him though like you stated earlier in the thread, it's fairly obvious that despite Weghorsts limitations, he's still better for the team overall than Ronaldo was.I can tell by the way you’ve responded to my last two posts that it’s impossible to have a sensible conversation with you. You read A, understand B then respond as if the initial statement was C. Have a good day.
Aye:
Two more points, would Rashford have scored so many goals if Ronaldo was playing instead of Weghorst? History would suggest he wouldn’t. And Ronaldo was on 4 times the salary of Weghorst.
Let's pick our entire first xi from redcafe then, the posters here would be ridiculously happy to wear the shirt
I can tell by the way you’ve responded to my last two posts that it’s impossible to have a sensible conversation with you. You read A, understand B then respond as if the initial statement was C. Have a good day.
Aye:
2023 Weghorst > 2022-23 Ronaldo
Ronaldo wouldn't have close to 20 goals playing for us this season and our general team play would be even worse than it is now. Ronaldo had to go, Weghorst shouldn't have come or at least been picked as much as he has. There's no answer to the question, which is in itself a statement of how dire our forward options are this season.
He scored 24 the year before, so it wouldn't be out of the question for him to knock in 15-20 over a full year. The obvious caveat being his attitude about ceding power to ETH at a time in his career when he feels he should be prioritized due to his legend status.
You've gone from it being "obvious" he would have 15-20 in him to "not out of the question" pretty quick Last season was exactly that, last season, and it was clear for most to see that he couldn't do it this season, it was just one campaign too far for him. No big. He'd have probably scored 5-10 goals in Europa League or Carling Cup, but there's little to suggest he's still capable of scoring goals in the volume or importance that make it a worthwhile idea to persist with him in the squad.
Edit: bear in mind Weghorst has almost no goals and can at least stay upright most of the time! Ronnie looks like he's wearing plimsolls these days sadly