- Joined
- May 10, 2009
- Messages
- 37,307
A world class player can play in any position and formation, Pogba can be a phenomenal on he’s day but then so can anyone.
That's not true.
A world class player can play in any position and formation, Pogba can be a phenomenal on he’s day but then so can anyone.
So which world class players can play in any position?A world class player can play in any position and formation, Pogba can be a phenomenal on he’s day but then so can anyone.
It's both. Sometimes he tries to be too fancy other times he just struggles to get involved and cope with the intensity of the game. Either way I'd call it not turning up. Genuinely trying too hard was often Rooney who tried to be everywhere and do everything. Pogba is not that player and never will be. He sort of coasts at his own pace and at times the tougher teams make that approach look poor and swat it away. That's what he needs to work at.I think it's more a case of him trying to do to much rather than "not turning up" as you put. He has all the required attributes to make him one of the worlds best midfielders - exceptional passing range, great vision and awareness, pace and stamina in abundance, physically able and he can seemlessly adabt to a variety of roles in the midfield area. Everything he needs to succeed at the very highest level of the game. No other player currently at the club comes close to his ability level by comparison.
The issue with Pogba is that he tries to do too much, like dribbling past 3-4 opposition players or attempting those extravagant Hollywood balls that he seems so keen on. I'm not sure if it's over confidence in his own ability or even a lack of confidence in his team mates ability that forces him to adopt the "if I don't do it no one else will" approach, but one way or another he has to stop overdoing it and learn to keep it simple.
For the record if we do win the league over the next couple of years - and I firmly believe we will - then it will be because of Pogba's influence on the team rather than in spite of him.
A world class player can play in any position and formation, Pogba can be a phenomenal on he’s day but then so can anyone.
That's not true.
So which world class players can play in any position?
Pogba's potential is great but the player who can do more things well won't necessarily be the better player. There are plenty of CMs who could do more things than Paul Scholes but he's still the best midfielder I've seen in English football and one of the two best across the board.Well, to be fair, not all midfielders are complete as well.
Look at Ozil or kroos. Ozil doesn't even dare shoot from outside the box anymore. He has no power. Kroos is too defensive now and most of his shots are weak.
Some playes like xhaka can only shoot but overall play (dribbling and passing) is poor.
Some players can't defend as they are too small eg David silva.
Of course, they are some good in defence but their attack isn't as good as pogba.
No one can match pogba's potential.
I think Pogba is a quality footballer and personally one of my two favourite United players. But i think this thread is part a reaction to his performances in tight games and part a reaction to the pedestal United fans have put him on. Which is also highlighted by the reaction to the thread. I don't see why we cant rate him and enjoy watching him thoroughly but also acknowledge that he's not there yet ?
The statement isn't true but there's a point in there somewhere. Messi can play attacking midfielder brilliantly. De Bruyne is great both as an AM and a CM. Scholes was magnificent both as a SS or a CM or even deeper later on. Gerrard excelled as a CM and second striker. And so on. Of course they too struggled the odd time with certain roles but the logic stands.
I do agree to an extent that Jose doesn't help Pogba by sticking him in a midfield two. At the same time, Lingard as an AM provides loads of defensive cover and not having a Pirlo next to him shouldn't incapacitate Pogba. That's the point. Yes I'm sure surrounding him with Pirlo and Marchisio is a dream for him. But he's still good enough to have a good game next to Lingard. And certainly good enough not to look terrible in comparison to him in a big game.
.
Messi is the best player in the world and arguably the greatest player of all time. And like @roonster09 said he's an exception to the rule.The statement isn't true but there's a point in there somewhere. Messi can play attacking midfielder brilliantly. De Bruyne is great both as an AM and a CM. Scholes was magnificent both as a SS or a CM or even deeper later on. Gerrard excelled as a CM and second striker. And so on. Of course they too struggled the odd time with certain roles but the logic stands.
I do agree to an extent that Jose doesn't help Pogba by sticking him in a midfield two. At the same time, Lingard as an AM provides loads of defensive cover and not having a Pirlo next to him shouldn't incapacitate Pogba. That's the point. Yes I'm sure surrounding him with Pirlo and Marchisio is a dream for him. But he's still good enough to have a good game next to Lingard. And certainly good enough not to look terrible in comparison to him in a big game.
Maybe in FIFA but definitely not in real world I guess.
It wasn't a midfielder, it wasn't an no.10, its Paul Pogba!
Pogba isn't good enough defensively as a CM and isn't nimble enough as No.10. How on earth did we break transfer record for someone like that? What were Mourinho thinking. Must have been mad.
To play him in a midfield 3, 4-3-3 we would need at least 2 world class attacker up front, which we currently only have 1 in Sanches. In current selections, 4-3-3 would only make us solid in midfield but we will lack in penetration. It will be more solid against top 6 but less penetrative against teams that parked the bus.
Enter Gareth Bale/similar player this summer then we are talking about 4-3-3
No one wants to say it because he has ability and cost a shite load of money, but it's more true than the thread saying the same about Lukaku.
Pogba is a playground footballer. Turns up to show off in games where the opposition are poor enough to allow us the luxury of him doing so. As soon as the team need him however, you can forget it.
He is more interested in inventing silly handshake routines, showing off, and wanting people to look at his hair, than he ever will be in working hard to help his team win a game.
He has the selfishness of a Gerrard or a Ronaldo but without any of the desire, determination, or basic maturity to go with it, and he's 24 years old. It is unlikely at this point he will ever grow up, and that means he will never be more than a liability in any game where it is important for him to put in work for the benefit of the team.
The idea some people have of playing him further forward because he doesn't work hard enough to play in central midfield is a nonsense...as if playing him in another position somehow makes it less important that he works hard. In a succesful team, every player works harder than Paul Pogba ever does.
The fact is that he is on a pedestal as United's best player, but when you look at City (i.e. the team top of the league), if Paul Pogba played for them in the same way he does for United, he would be told to either grow up or feck off. He wouldn't get close to getting a game for them unless he had a serious change of attitude. At United he seems to go completely unchecked for it because he can showboat around onceor twice every ten games, against the likes of Stoke.
lol. you maybe on to something.We will never win the league with Mourinho as our manager would be more realistic.
well said!Again showing yourself to be clueless. Pogba has plenty to improve on no doubt but this thread will come back to haunt you.
So which world class players can play in any position?
You know for so long i have said that Pogba is our best player in terms of ability and sharpness. He is clever and picks up movement faster than any other player. He had a woeful game against Spurs because he was attacked as soon as he got the ball every time which he did not expect and Spurs pressed deep into our half and kept our midfield wary throughout the game. If you check on Pogba's movement, he was all over the pitch and did all he could but Spurs held the ball and did good for most of the game. Without much possession as a team, Pogba is not one single person we can blame. We did bad as a team and we probably didn't get the setup right against them.It's tactics, that's it. Put Iniesta in this set up and you'd be making the same thread about him, clueless.
Put Pogba in a midfield three and give him license to do whatever the feck he wants. There isn't another player in world football that possesses a combination of his physical, technical and mental capabilities. As him to play in a midfield 2 with a woefully out of form Matic and he's doomed to struggle. Herrera should have started in place of Lingard tonight, for no other reason than his tenacity and willingness to do the dirty work would have freed up Pogba to impose himself on the game.
I agree with you about Pogba being a player 'between positions', but I disagree that we need to do anything much more than play a proper mid 3...
Herrera----Matic----Pogba
Martial-----Rom-----Sanchez
Would be fine for now, and buy one top quality Mid in the Summer.
No one wants to say it because he has ability and cost a shite load of money, but it's more true stency than the thread saying the same about Lukaku.
Pogba is a playground footballer. Turns up to show off in games where the opposition are poor enough to allow us the luxury of him doing so. As soon as the team need him however, you can forget it.
He is more interested in inventing silly handshake routines, showing off, and wanting people to look at his hair, than he ever will be in working hard to help his team win a game.
He has the selfishness of a Gerrard or a Ronaldo but without any of the desire, determination, or basic maturity to go with it, and he's 24 years old. It is unlikely at this point he will ever grow up, and that means he will never be more than a liability in any game where it is important for him to put in work for the benefit of the team.
The idea some people have of playing him further forward because he doesn't work hard enough to play in central midfield is a nonsense...as if playing him in another position somehow makes it less important that he works hard. In a succesful team, every player works harder than Paul Pogba ever does.
The fact is that he is on a pedestal as United's best player, but when you look at City (i.e. the team top of the league), if Paul Pogba played for them in the same way he does for United, he would be told to either grow up or feck off. He wouldn't get close to getting a game for them unless he had a serious change of attitude. At United he seems to go completely unchecked for it because he can showboat around onceor twice every ten games, against the likes of Stoke.
I expected to read this opinion piece and immediately dismiss it but sadly find it very truthful. Pogba can be a brilliant player but mostly isn't. The opinion seems to be "build the team around Pogba", but how can you do this when he lacks consistency and often goes missing or is unable to make a telling difference. He seems to lack the necessary tactical, defensive and hardworking qualities. I am more interested in what is best for the team than what is best for Pogba. He doesn't show enough defensive ability and hasn't been great going forward either. I think he is capable of being more than he is currently showing.
Yes. But do that you have to give him the best possible chance to thrive, something I don't think has happened. He's been directly involved in 15 goals in 25 games or something similar, he's criminally underrated by some people.
Generally world class players don't/can't play in any position. They get so good at one position or a couple at most and that's what makes them world class.
If Pogba doesn't nail down a specific position and become as good as he can be then he's not world class. He'll just be outstanding talent with the wrong application. Not necessarily his fault because of Mourinho and Deschamps playing a system that doesn't suit him nor put him in his favoured position but still.
I expected to read this opinion piece and immediately dismiss it but sadly find it very truthful. Pogba can be a brilliant player but mostly isn't. The opinion seems to be "build the team around Pogba", but how can you do this when he lacks consistency and often goes missing or is unable to make a telling difference. He seems to lack the necessary tactical, defensive and hardworking qualities. I am more interested in what is best for the team than what is best for Pogba. He doesn't show enough defensive ability and hasn't been great going forward either. I think he is capable of being more than he is currently showing.
Messi is the best player in the world and arguably the greatest player of all time. And like @roonster09 said he's an exception to the rule.
Did Gerrard and Scholes really excell in the SS position? To excell in a position you must perform in said position for a period of time. Gerrard and Scholes were poor for England on a regular basis too. I think you're scraping the barrel here..
De Bruyne is playing for a team that has the majority of possession in most games. Guardiola teams are renowned for hunting in packs hence winning the ball back quickly. Playing in a midfield two next to Fernandinho who is very quick and mobile compared to Matic is also a big advantage. Like the above poster said, put KDB next to a immobile Matic in a pragmatic set up where the back line is deep in comparison to the high line of City without the mobile Fernandinho and the Spurs midfield would still run riot.
Not having Pirlo doesn't incapacitate Pogba at all. You could use the same criteria to critique Pirlo who needs a extra man in midfield to showcase his fantastic ability as the legendary regista that we now know he is. The team formation has to be set to benefit your better players and a 3 man midfield not only benefited Pogba but Pirlo aswell.
It's like Rooney said yesterday during the Watford v Chelsea game. That himself and Tevez did the defensive work and absolved Ronaldo from do it ,so he could stay fresh to concentrate on the scoring and creating goals. He also said we should do the same with Pogba. I think many would agree with that.
Pogba didn't play well against Spurs no question about that, but let's not get carried away and dismiss his season thus far due to a couple of bad games. He's been good for most of the season considering he missed 10 games through injury and suspension.
De Bruyne wins the ball back because city play a high press design to win and keep possession. It’s peps system. De Bruyne would not do well in a 2 man midfield because no one would be dumb enough to put him in one.
Paul isn’t bad in a 2. He isn’t 10/10 these best ever amazing like every expects but he’s been solid all year except for a couple of games. Seeing how bad we are without him says something about the other players not him. He can’t string a coherent pass without him. Other teams no that so when he does play they foul him and double mark him out the game. Hes been pretty good this year. I’d say he’s been stellar for the most part but you might get your underwear in at twist. He’s so overrated that’s why he wouldn’t make it into any other team but ours. City would absolutely love him on their team.
He’s only overrated because you never wanted him to be good in the first place. That’s why after a bad game people like you and so many others are so ready to crucify him and everyone else on the team when you where queit months ago. It’s just a game sometimes you need to say damn that was a bad game and move on. If he or any of the players are on the forum that’s what they do. Take this lost in stride and don’t overrated like the knee jerk glory hunter that are supposed to be fans on this forum.
If it is at all possible, you should give Pogba the best conditions to thrive. The question is, is what's best for him best for the team? In a three man midfield, I think we lack attacking quality.
Saying all of this, I still expect every player to work hard, defensively. I don't think he can be given a free role. He hasn't show me that he is a good enough attacking player for that role.
15 pages and this spoof thread is still alive
Next up: Barca will never win against Stoke with Messi?
One of the best games Pogba had was the Everton game [2-0 win on January 1], when he was on the left of Matic - in a similar position to the one he played at Juventus - and Ander Herrera was on the right.
I think that position where he's on the left of a midfield three is where he's at his best. He's a brilliant crosser of the ball and I don't think he's as effective when he's having to do more defensive work in central areas.
I would like to see him in a 4-3-3 with Matic sitting, Herrera to the right and Pogba to the left, with a selection of the front three thriving off more creativity behind them.
Excellent post, exactly the things I was going to write.
It's worrying when Rooney is seeing what so many posters fail to. You play to your best players' strengths, you don't ask them to play with one hand tied behind their back. Thats a job for others.
Spent the game playing with 10 men because of him today. Now we're losing because he can't be bothered to jump for a header.