Foxbatt
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2013
- Messages
- 14,297
So which ones then
Moritz Volz would be a good candidate too as he had experience in the PL and now the Bundesliga and also Rene Maric.
So which ones then
I’m sure nobody wants him to fail.
I don’t agree with any of your analysis, though. I think we look better than most teams most of the time. Coaching is not the problem, it is the technical ability of a small number of players in key positions, primarily CM, that’s holding us back.
I’m sure nobody wants him to fail.
I don’t agree with any of your analysis, though. I think we look better than most teams most of the time. Coaching is not the problem, it is the technical ability of a small number of players in key positions, primarily CM, that’s holding us back.
Now, obviously, you are looking for different things and I’m sure it’s true that you don’t like the way we play, but that’s a different thing to being badly coached.
It’s the same as ever, you get the best players you can. Every year you try to get better players. All the teams do it, and every year one of them wins (and the rest fail).
Sometimes a team seems to outperform its players and the coaches get credit there but, in most cases, these are purple patches, anomalies, coincidences where a collection of lesser known players turn out to be very good players (Leicester players of current and recent history are a great example).
History is littered with “great” coaches who did well at unfancied teams for short periods and then failed over and over. That time when they did well, it was probably the players, mostly.
I might have got sidetracked there. What I’m saying is: each time we get better players in, we will, on balance, get better results. Or maybe we won’t.
The great thing is, we’re going to see this all happen over the next couple of years.
Im literally quoting others posts, im not plucking narratives out of thin air. Trying to pretend to be reasonable now doesnt work. Its out first away defeat in 13 months ffs. How easy do you think football is that we can achieve that and not be a cohesive side? Klopp wouldn't be 6th, Jose wouldn't be out of EL and mid table and Lampard wouldn't be fired.
Theres a difference in not liking how we play and pretending we dont know how to.
Theres a difference in expecting to beat Leicester and having a shit fit with the sky falling in because they beat us.
You talk about expectationss but feck me we are playing above expectations going by the pre season thoughts on here.
We certainly need better players so that sounds like a good plan to me.I love how people were happy to throw the term chequebook manager around for Jose but see something entirely different here. As if Ole’s only plan isn’t just “buy better players” under the pretense of cultural rebuild and structural changes.
Disagree wholeheartedly.I’m sure nobody wants him to fail.
I don’t agree with any of your analysis, though. I think we look better than most teams most of the time. Coaching is not the problem, it is the technical ability of a small number of players in key positions, primarily CM, that’s holding us back.
Now, obviously, you are looking for different things and I’m sure it’s true that you don’t like the way we play, but that’s a different thing to being badly coached.
It’s the same as ever, you get the best players you can. Every year you try to get better players. All the teams do it, and every year one of them wins (and the rest fail).
Sometimes a team seems to outperform its players and the coaches get credit there but, in most cases, these are purple patches, anomalies, coincidences where a collection of lesser known players turn out to be very good players (Leicester players of current and recent history are a great example).
History is littered with “great” coaches who did well at unfancied teams for short periods and then failed over and over. That time when they did well, it was probably the players, mostly.
I might have got sidetracked there. What I’m saying is: each time we get better players in, we will, on balance, get better results. Or maybe we won’t.
The great thing is, we’re going to see this all happen over the next couple of years.
Modernised a buzzword like better and more agile work place.. Ole is doing good, we just need a good attacking coach and some more Ole players, he still use deadwood from others, fred, martial etcetera, but All Are like those Are good enough for Ole..Can't see us achieving much with Ole in charge. Reminds me of 17/18 where we managed to finish 2nd while playing average football, and many ignored the lack of progress made in our actual football and the genuine progress in that of Klopp's Livepool just because we got the 2nd place finish trophy. Ole's last two seasons are the same. We aren't on the road to challenging at all, but manage to do about enough to keep people satisfied. The quality of football, for me, just isn't there. We are, still, an old school football team that never modernised which a shame over 2 years into our 4th manager post SAF.
In another year or two. I agree it shouldn’t go on indefinitely, but I don’t agree that we look poor and haven’t improved. When our best team is fit and in form we look brilliant to me, but we lack depth of quality and leadership in CM and don’t have a reliable CF.Disagree wholeheartedly.
This theory of buy better players until you are a great side under the same manager hardly ever works.
The so called better players need structure to perform. And that is the problem, we don't seem to have that structure. You complain about technical ability. Are you telling me Ole does not have any input in the players that arrive?
We signed one of the key players in a side that was known for its technical ability, a side I saw play Madrid off the park. Now, he looks lost. You complain about ability but I saw a coach that left Fred on the pitch for 84 minutes.
This idea of masking Ole's shortcomings by giving him the best side in the world cannot work.
Great managers build great sides. But great managers instil great structures, team ethos which improve naturally as players coming in. But from the minute they arrove, you can see what they're trying to achieve. Are we seeing that here, answer honestly? It seems you're asking me to believe that once a raft of players come in, like a switch, a great side will emerge.
You say I might not like the way the team plays and it's not evidence of bad coaching. Maybe, but it is quite blatant to the naked eye this team consistently struggles to do the basics of what you'd expect from a team aspiring to challenge for trophies. The alarming part is that you cannot honestly say the team is even improving in those aspects. When we have the ball, we look as poor as we did 12, 18, 24 months ago. That's after €300m. There's an argument we've gotten worse.
Since you disagree with me, then tell me. At what point should we start asking questions?
Agree with this. Shaw and AWB are 2 of the best attacking FBs in the world in terms of creating chances, nobody thought Ole could coach that out of them. With all the nonsense of Ole and attacking patterns, nobody thought Ole would have us close to having scored the most goals on the league. Its easy to see improvement because this is basically the same 11 that started the first game of last season when a loy of fans said we needed an overhaul of the squad to even come close. You can actually see where the improvement is coming from on the training pitch.In another year or two. I agree it shouldn’t go on indefinitely, but I don’t agree that we look poor and haven’t improved. When our best team is fit and in form we look brilliant to me, but we lack depth of quality and leadership in CM and don’t have a reliable CF.
Improving the squad by recruitment is almost always the key to improving results. Contrary to what you say, a policy of not recruiting almost never exists for big clubs and almost never works.
Agree with this. Shaw and AWB are 2 of the best attacking FBs in the world in terms of creating chances, nobody thought Ole could coach that out of them. With all the nonsense of Ole and attacking patterns, nobody thought Ole would have us close to having scored the most goals on the league. Its easy to see improvement because this is basically the same 11 that started the first game of last season when a loy of fans said we needed an overhaul of the squad to even come close. You can actually see where the improvement is coming from on the training pitch.
In another year or two. I agree it shouldn’t go on indefinitely, but I don’t agree that we look poor and haven’t improved. When our best team is fit and in form we look brilliant to me, but we lack depth of quality and leadership in CM and don’t have a reliable CF.
Improving the squad by recruitment is almost always the key to improving results. Contrary to what you say, a policy of not recruiting almost never exists for big clubs and almost never works.
Either fill the squad with world-class players or get a new manager. I see no other way.Then, what is the solution
Liepzeg.Genuinely tell me matches we've looked brilliant this season? Really want an answer. City away comes to mind instantly, but that was very recent so its easy to remember. PSG away. I want whole games that we performed brilliantly.
We've had good halves, spells in games, but not nearly enough whole games where we've been brilliant. The amount of first halves this season that have been a total write off is just something that shouldn't be a thing for a Man Utd team really, or any top side.
No, what im saying is you can see progression and actual coaching because there was so little change in our first 11 for 2 seasons. Our record against non top 6 sides since Bruno came in is ridiculous, thats another avenue we improved on that fans pretend didnt happen.So basically what you’re saying is, all the good things are Ole’s doing, and all the not so good things aren’t his fault?
What about last game of last season that probably mattered more. Did that mean Ole was ‘better’ than Rogers then? Did Rogers not know how to set his team up to win that day?You saw it yesterday. A manager with a vision and ability to get the players left in the side how to play to win and one who hadn't a clue. Unfortunately he managed the blue team. We are going nowhere fast with Ole. In fact if we finish 2nd in the end he has nowhere to go. He won't make the next step to 1st. He will keep his job though as long as he can get top 4 every season
Yeah sureNo counter attack no win
When Leicester were in freefall?What about last game of last season that probably mattered more. Did that mean Ole was ‘better’ than Rogers then? Did Rogers not know how to set his team up to win that day?
making your point off one game is silly
What do you see in this team that thinks our performances are improving long term and that gives us a chance at a genuine title push?Yeah sure
That’s how we’re second in the league
OkWhen Leicester were in freefall?
No counter attack no win is just nonsense don’t change the subject nowWhat do you see in this team that thinks our performances are improving long term and that gives us a chance at a genuine title push?
You want to see us lose?Hopefully Tottenham will catch us then he will be sacked
Your inability to understand it is not my concern. Yes if only every manager has better players and coaches as well, to do what they are unable to.Modernised a buzzword like better and more agile work place.. Ole is doing good, we just need a good attacking coach and some more Ole players, he still use deadwood from others, fred, martial etcetera, but All Are like those Are good enough for Ole..
No problem with the coaching today. Team shape was very good for the most part. Lack of quality in midfield killed us again.
You could question the team selection, too many changes, question marks over fitness of at least three starters, balance slightly off in that sense.
Players looked a bit knackered and lacking sharpness. Again, not a coaching issue.
Liepzeg.
I agree with your general point though
I'm not making it off one game. We have played well in a few games this season, just not enough of them to see any progress. We have relied on Bruno pulling a rabbit out of the hat too many times and when he can't we struggle. We have one tactic, to counter attack. A bit like a lower club use when they play the big teams. It works when a team attacks us regular, like City, but not when they sit back.What about last game of last season that probably mattered more. Did that mean Ole was ‘better’ than Rogers then? Did Rogers not know how to set his team up to win that day?
making your point off one game is silly
It was clearly tongue in cheek. Sarcasm doesn't go down well here.No counter attack no win is just nonsense don’t change the subject now
Anyone who thinks a poor coach can seat second on the log. Needs their head examined. League tables don't lie.