The strawman some people are putting up is soul destroying. No one is asking for us to win the quadruple, no one is asking for us to look like prime Barca.
All people are saying is if after 2.5 years, the team cannot resemble a cohesive footballing side, then there are serious problems and serious questions need to be asked.
How many good performances have we had this season? How many times have we played a match and you can say this team knows what it's doing and knows how to go about its business? Are you seeing a side that is evolving tactically and improving in it's way of playing...heck, what's our way of playing? We look like the footballing version of Boris Johnson. Obviously not prepared but quite good at bluffing its way to a result.
We consistently and that the key CONSISTENLY produce poor performances. Just close your eyes to the results for one(they're not even that great). We are consistently below par. This isn't his first season at some point, you have to start looking at how we are playing.
You have your head stuck somewhere if you think people want him to fail. Some people have no faith that he's good enough. There's a difference.
Leicester have key players missing but somehow still manages to look like a unit. We look like strangers 70% of the time. It's not acceptable for a club aiming for trophies.
I’m sure nobody wants him to fail.
I don’t agree with any of your analysis, though. I think we look better than most teams most of the time. Coaching is not the problem, it is the technical ability of a small number of players in key positions, primarily CM, that’s holding us back.
Now, obviously, you are looking for different things and I’m sure it’s true that you don’t like the way we play, but that’s a different thing to being badly coached.
It’s the same as ever, you get the best players you can. Every year you try to get better players. All the teams do it, and every year one of them wins (and the rest fail).
Sometimes a team seems to outperform its players and the coaches get credit there but, in most cases, these are purple patches, anomalies, coincidences where a collection of lesser known players turn out to be very good players (Leicester players of current and recent history are a great example).
History is littered with “great” coaches who did well at unfancied teams for short periods and then failed over and over. That time when they did well, it was probably the players, mostly.
I might have got sidetracked there. What I’m saying is: each time we get better players in, we will, on balance, get better results. Or maybe we won’t.
The great thing is, we’re going to see this all happen over the next couple of years.