clarkydaz
Full Member
Rooney was our best player against Hull now? this thread has gone through the looking glass
Rooney was our best player against Hull now? this thread has gone through the looking glass
see above, someone else doesI think some people who watched the match started to comment and not just those with their comments already typed out.
Just to clarify I don't think he was our best player, I think Bailly was, from the starters at least.
Looking at that Rooney individual performance highlights, obviously that video has been edited with only the good/decent things he's done because I remember the game quite differently.
see above, someone else does
Obviously in bold and underlined by the author, not by me.
Well, there are multiple psychological studies that show that often, our prejudices control what we see.
That's why people cannot believe the numbers.
Now they cannot believe the video, either!
Obviously!...
I think some people who watched the match started to comment and not just those with their comments already typed out.
Just to clarify I don't think he was our best player, I think Bailly was, from the starters at least.
Baily did well, but he didn't have to do much.
This is the problem, I think. He's still a quality footballer, despite what anyone will tell you, but he's now a past-it, out of shape quality footballer. It's Touré syndrome. How long do you stick with a player who has the knack of getting an assist or a goal each game but will contribute far less for the rest of the 90 minutes than his rivals for the position? It's easy to slip into the trap of assuming that no-one else could provide that goal or assist. I'm pretty confident that if Rashford of Miki got a full 90 minutes they'd be scoring and assisting too.
He didn't have to because he played so well, the amount of balls him, blind and fellaini cut out between them was very high, allowed us to dominate and literally park in their half. Its small margins between those three for man of the match but I really felt in the last few minutes Bailly was pushing us on.
Honestly if you watch that video and don't see he actually had a good game you have lost your impartialness. I'm not stretching beyond that but he did a lot of useful stuff and definitely put the ball into zlatan inside the box as well as setting up chances for team mates and creating chances well.
The poor period at the start of last season has left a lot of people too far gone the other way, you won't be able to see him as playing okay or good until he scores 8 hatricks in 8 games.
Yes. There are obvious strengths and weaknesses to every player and Rooney's weaknesses (time spent on the ball, poor control, generally insipid passing)
He was fine but there wasn't much good about it. He mostly just kept things ticking without really doing a whole lot, until the assist anyway.
The above video shows none of that. No time spend on ball, good passing, good control (excellent control for the assist).
But your description fits the Miki video above.
He didn't have to do much because Hull was focused on defense.
Riddle me this guys. If Rooney had such a decent performance;
- why were Rio/Scholes pressed on the issue at halftime?
- why did the manager after the game have to explain why he left him on?
A good ball? He fecking walloped it at him. It's the hardest shot I've seen him take all season. The pass to Pogba was so much easier and could have been played without adding about a ton of unnecessary weight to the ball.He plays a good ball in to zlatan in the area who takes a terrible touch? What an absolutely embarrassing gif to tweet.
Rashford didn't win us the game, Rooney did. The difficult part of the goal was clearly the assist. Watch the video posted above, how anyone can come out of that saying he was poor is just daft.
What Rooney did was 90% of it. And yes. Only Rooney could have done that. The drive and power. Nothing was going to stop him. In a way it remined me of that thunderbolt of a goal v Newcastle years ago.
He also had many poor touches.
He clearly is at the end of his best days. But he is a club Legend. He deserves to break Charlton's record and he will this season.
Next season, all I will have are the great memories.
Danny Murphy said on MOTD he was outstanding against Bournemouth, was he correct?Because people buy media spin as they don't really understand football. The media brought up questions. Those who know a bit about football in Rio, scholes and Mourinho explained to people why he plays.
One good match of the day piece on him and opinions will change. A lot of people really just don't get it.
The three videos again.
Watch and compare.
And there is no need for Martial and Mata videos...
Danny Murphy said on MOTD he was outstanding against Bournemouth, was he correct?
His touch wasn't a problem on Saturday although quite often it is.
I think people who claim that this assist was the only worthwhile action from Rooney are just being silly and bitter. He created quite a few good opportunities and participated in some great moves as well. Basically in terms of his involvement he was no worse than any other attacking player.Agreed but it's really annoying watching him. The guy is only 30 years old but is so dodgy in normal play
I hope its just his normal take a while to get into form stuff....
Oh, argy. That was a lovely pass.
Cos he was excellentRiddle me this guys. If Rooney had such a decent performance;
- why were Rio/Scholes pressed on the issue at halftime?
- why did the manager after the game have to explain why he left him on?
Good point. In the first half he was even letting the Hull players in on the fun.Another aspect that we often overlook is how selfless Rooney's game is.
Many strikers would not pass to Rashford at the end, they'd try to get the goal themselves.
Good point. In the first half he was even letting the Hull players in on the fun.
Good post.1. Rooney would ideally not be a starting XI player week in and week out anymore, though I think he still has the quality to be a valuable squad player for us.
2. Martial and Mata have been worse than Rooney this season and should be under more threat to lose their places than him.
3. None of our goals have been "brilliant" because the interplay between our attacking players is still a work in progress. Often Pogba, Rooney and Ibra all congest the middle of the field and neither Mata or Martial have been making well timed runs in behind to exploit the space Ibra leaves when he drops deeper to receive the ball.
4. Rooney had an average game overall against Hull, but he won us the 3 points at the death and deserves to be picked again as nobody else was able to create an opportunity that good over the 90 minutes, bar Rashford's driving run into the box and shot to the far corner which was saved by the GK.
5. Objectively looking at the the performances of the starting front 4 it seems to me that Rooney has done more to keep his spot than Mata or Martial. Imo the biggest problem we have is that neither of our wing players are making runs in behind the defense or driving at defenders. Rashford and Mkhitaryan improved us tremendously when they came on and as a result we created far more in the last 30 minutes of that match than we had until that point as they gave the team a more dynamic element that had been lacking.
6. If I was Mourinho, I'd drop Mata for Mkhi and seriously consider dropping Martial for Rashford for the City match. I get the sense that Mkhi will come in for Mata, but that Jose will give Martial one more opportunity to come good before putting Rashford in for him.
Pretty funny this part of your post because because in your opinion passing to pogba (who had no one within 6 feet of him) was bad as it could be intercepted and he had his back to goal? Yet passing to Zlatan who had two players within two feet of him and also his back to goal was the better option?And actually, a pass to Pogba would be a bad choice. It could be intercepted. But even if it went through, Pogba would be with his back to the goal and three opponents around him.