Acrobat7
Full Member
On no, wasn't that Saudi club supposed to buy Coman? (Totally expect Chelsea to trigger Osimhen's release clause next transfer window.)
He's earning 500k per week net.
And yet he's never played in an 'elite league'. I know that's a disparaging comment but Italy, France and Belgium are way off England and Spain. I honestly haven't seen him play enough for Napoli domestically so I can't say too much around his suitability to play in a better league but when I have seen him in the CL and the odd game, he hasn't impressed me. Unlike Haaland when he was playing for Leipzig who was dispatching teams on his own.
That's based on European cup performance though, not league strength. Italian teams have done well in the Europa and Conference league in recent years. English teams not so much. But Italian teams have been shite in the CL. So it's not exactly weighted evenly.Uefa coefficients clearly have Seria A on the rise for the past 5 years hence why the PL didn't get its 5 UCL spots
Not really, I don't rate Italy, France, Belgium as leagues, throw Germany in there if you want, and I think Osimhen is overrated. I'm pretty consistent. Disagreeing with that statement doesn't mean I'm 'all over the place'.Ligue 1 and Serie A are top 5 leagues. Also to say Serie A isn't an elite league is daft. Haaland played for Dortmund. You're all over the place.
That's based on European cup performance though, not league strength. Italian teams have done well in the Europa and Conference league in recent years. English teams not so much. But Italian teams have been shite in the CL. So it's not exactly weighted evenly.
Not really, I don't rate Italy, France, Belgium as leagues, throw Germany in there if you want, and I think Osimhen is overrated. I'm pretty consistent. Disagreeing with that statement doesn't mean I'm 'all over the place'.
Inter, Milan, Roma, Lazio, Juventus, are all massive names that belong in the CL but most of them are bumming around in the Europa league and Conference league for the most part, which says everything you need to know about the direction these teams have gone in the last 10 years. Inter got to a final and did very well, that doesn't mean Serie A is somehow level with the likes of England and Spain in terms of league quality.Its an indication of league strength, how good your teams fair against over team in Europe not just in the UCL but also Europa and Conference leagues is an indication of the strength of your teams.
Italians teams have been shit in the UCL but one was in the final only 2 season ago outplaying City
Inter, Milan, Roma, Lazio, Juventus, are all massive names that belong in the CL but most of them are bumming around in the Europa league and Conference league for the most part, which says everything you need to know about the direction these teams have gone in the last 10 years. Inter got to a final and did very well, that doesn't mean Serie A is somehow level with the likes of England and Spain in terms of league quality.
But they didn't beat them? They lost. And even if they beat them in the final it doesn't mean the league is of amazing quality all of a sudden. Inter haven't exactly set the world alight after losing that final, in fact they sold off their best players and their manager left.Inter got to the CL final in 22/23 when Napoli won the Serie A and were unlucky not to beat City in the final. Last season Atalanta were the only team that beat Leverkusen all season to win the EL final and they absolutely destroyed them. You indicated that Haaland played for Leipzig when he played for Dortmund. Coefficients are defintely a good way to judge a league as it indicates the level of competition you're up against each week.
You're right, I don't watch Serie A because it's largely shit.Names don't get you into the UCL. Inter were literally in the UCL final 2 seasons ago and haven't played in the Conference league ever by the way.
Roma and Lazio are no longer considered top sides in Seria A they are Villa / Newcastle level Roma probably a little lower, Juve like United going through a bit of a rebuild and due to the competitivness of the league have falling down a little.
Lets face it you clearly have little knowledge of Seria A in its current form so lets just move on
You're right, I don't watch Serie A because it's largely shit.
But they didn't beat them? They lost. And even if they beat them in the final it doesn't mean the league is of amazing quality all of a sudden. Inter haven't exactly set the world alight after losing that final, in fact they sold off their best players and their manager left.
Atalanta were great last year, I watched them in the Europa league, but a well run team doesn't mean the quality of the league is great.
I meant RB Salzburg, not Leipzig. I confused the Red Bull thing.
Maybe I don't? But looking at the coefficients and saying 'Serie A is a great league' doesn't exactly scream deep knowledge either does it?and...? To get to the final of the CL indicates that you've been a quality team in some respect.
Coefficients give a good indicator of the strength of the league as do Serie A teams getting to the finals consistently of European competitions in the past few seasons.
It just doesn't sound like you know what you're talking about when it comes to the Serie A.
This is just you wanting to be differentI actually might rate him above Haaland
Could have afforded him last summer IF we hadn't spent £100m on Mount and Onana
https://www.uefa.com/nationalassociations/uefarankings/country/?year=2024You're right, I don't watch Serie A because it's largely shit.
Only if he drops his wage demands significantly. He will be in nearly 650k per week in Saudi.Nuts that Napoli mis understood the market so badly. Last summer rejecting a £150mil bid from PSG. This summer lucky to get half that amount as market conditions have changed so much.
Wouldn't be surprised to see him in PL after a season in Saudi Arabia.
Of course, but wasn't this supposed to be some sort of 'swap' deal?
Only if he drops his wage demands significantly. He will be in nearly 650k per week in Saudi.
In case people haven’t noticed there is a bit of a revolution going on with wages in England. For him to take even a 50% cut would still put him above 300k pw
Im talking in the assumption that he’s gonna go to SAHis wage demands are not 650k a week, its to maintain his current Napoli salary its only 650k a week for Saudi. Chelsea are still in negotiations with him
Fair but again hes not going to ask 650k from anyone other than Suadi which is why he isn't now, and there is a reason he has asked for a release clause and one that is significantly lower than 100m euros.Im talking in the assumption that he’s gonna go to SA
I can’t understand why any player would want to go to Chelsea at the moment, you’re only a manager sacking away from being told you are up for sale. I think SA is a safer betNo? Chelsea's first priority was always about ditching Lukaku on a permanent move, whether it was to Napoli or anywhere else.
Outside of that we've held a long time interest in Osimhen but that move has always been viewed as more or less a long shot because of his salary demands. The idea has been that if Osimhen doesn't want to go to the Saudis we could try to negotiate a reasonable contract if there are no other European clubs after a top striker in this window. But now that he's opened the door to the Saudis it's game over for that plan and chances are we'd have to pay through the nose to actually land him.
It'll be a shame if he actually decides to go waste away in the Saudi League at the age of 25 when he's just about to enter his prime years as a player. But also quite telling of what his priorities are.
Seeing as there's a rich history of Nigerian players faking their age for work permits, I wouldn't really put too much emphasis on how old he is or what his motivations are.No? Chelsea's first priority was always about ditching Lukaku on a permanent move, whether it was to Napoli or anywhere else.
Outside of that we've held a long time interest in Osimhen but that move has always been viewed as more or less a long shot because of his salary demands. The idea has been that if Osimhen doesn't want to go to the Saudis we could try to negotiate a reasonable contract if there are no other European clubs after a top striker in this window. But now that he's opened the door to the Saudis it's game over for that plan and chances are we'd have to pay through the nose to actually land him.
It'll be a shame if he actually decides to go waste away in the Saudi League at the age of 25 when he's just about to enter his prime years as a player. But also quite telling of what his priorities are.
Really? Are there any proven cases of Nigerians who have played in Europe with falsified ages?Seeing as there's a rich history of Nigerian players faking their age for work permits, I wouldn't really put too much emphasis on how old he is or what his motivations are.
Seeing as there's a rich history of Nigerian players faking their age for work permits, I wouldn't really put too much emphasis on how old he is or what his motivations are.