Zaphod2319
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2020
- Messages
- 4,389
- Supports
- Chelsea
30M Euros a year. 3M Euros a month tax free. 120M in 4 years. How do you say no to that?
30M Euros a year. 3M Euros a month tax free. 120M in 4 years. How do you say no to that?
Wouldn’t you?They are already giving up Nicolas Jackson as their first choice forward?
Source?30M Euros a year. 3M Euros a month tax free. 120M in 4 years. How do you say no to that?
I'm guessing Saudi as we all know the UK isn't tax freeWho has offered that?
This guy just isn't good. He's record at Napoli isn't even particularly good.
65 goals and 16 assists in 108 league appearances for Napoli with a total of 8136 minutes played. That's a goal or an assist per every 100 minutes played. That is an excellent record whichever way you put it.
But then there's the injuries which are my main issue with this guy. Based on his entire career so far he seems to be fit for around 25 league games a season on average, which is not exactly what you'd want from a hugely expensive striker. And while he has so far been able to perform really well between the injury spells, who's to say how long that will continue. The older the player gets the more impact those injuries will have on his body and it's possible he won't age particularly well as a player.
Personally I rate him and think he could be a really good asset for Chelsea if the club can make the finances work. Even the injuries might be manageable because we already have Jackson who I rate rather highly as well. But at the same time I can't say I'd be too disappointed if we miss out, because of the risks involved.
DiMarzio reported that AL Ahli has.Who has offered that?
Source?
Meeting soon between the agent of #Osimhen , Roberto Calenda, and the sporting director of @ALAHLI_FC . Negotiation that is entering the heart of the matter: the striker is offered 30 million per year for 4 years. If Osimhen says yes, the two clubs will try to agree on the figures
Haven't seen him play to be honest, but the internet has him in the top 5 strikers in the world in almost every count.I think he's shite tbh, and barring his one anomaly goal scoring season in 22/23, he hasn't looked great at all. He's another Lukaku but worse.
Osimhen to Saudi would be a massive waste of a career.
If they sign him, that puts Chelsea on negative 1bn € since the takeover, can anyone explain to me how on Earth this works within PSR?
Chelsea has been selling great on players with no/zero book value, and also have been signing a lot of players on long contracts (which helps with keeping ammortisation costs, no longer allowed anymore). They will struggle to sell those players though, as selling them will really hurt their PSR budget.If they sign him, that puts Chelsea on negative 1bn € since the takeover, can anyone explain to me how on Earth this works within PSR?
More than likely Chelsea has 3 issues to negotiate in next 12 months;Easy - you just need to sell hotels to yourself to satisfy the Premier League's rules. Unfortunately for Chelsea, it has emerged that UEFA are a little more strict:
Chelsea face ‘more than challenging’ bid to meet Uefa’s financial rules
Premier League side in difficult position after European governing body confirmed it does not allow clubs to register income from selling assets, like its two hotels, to sister companies
https://www.thetimes.com/sport/football/article/chelsea-uefa-financial-rules-football-bff0b5znw
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/f...idered-European-footballs-governing-body.html
Haven't seen him play to be honest, but the internet has him in the top 5 strikers in the world in almost every count.
Osimhen apparently really close to joining the saudi club as they're offering 40m per year.If Chelsea buy Osimhen and Sancho how do they line up having already bought Felix and Neto this window alone, plus having Palmer and the other 6 or 7 options?!
Just a hunch but I'd take it the team of professionals working at Chelsea know what they're doing and the media fear-mongering for clicks will once again fall flat. Nothing has just 'emerged' and they either have it under control or are willing to take the fine in order to realise future gains.Easy - you just need to sell hotels to yourself to satisfy the Premier League's rules. Unfortunately for Chelsea, it has emerged that UEFA are a little more strict:
Chelsea face ‘more than challenging’ bid to meet Uefa’s financial rules
Premier League side in difficult position after European governing body confirmed it does not allow clubs to register income from selling assets, like its two hotels, to sister companies
https://www.thetimes.com/sport/football/article/chelsea-uefa-financial-rules-football-bff0b5znw
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/f...idered-European-footballs-governing-body.html
Yeah those professionals have never landed Chelsea with transfer bans in the pastJust a hunch but I'd take it the team of professionals working at Chelsea know what they're doing and the media fear-mongering for clicks will once again fall flat. Nothing has just 'emerged' and they either have it under control or are willing to take the fine in order to realise future gains.
Definitely, he had one good seasonFound his level.
We just need to leak a story that he's heading to Saudi unless Chelsea make an offer.Hopefully Chelsea sign Sancho in anger then!
Chelsea in the mud. Sold Lukaku so they could sign him and now he's off for mega money instead.
I mean, is it? He's going to get paid above and beyond what someone of his ability should ever receive, so in that regard he's maximising his earning potential, and he's not going to win anything major joining the likes of Chelsea. If you're only options are Napoli, Chelsea or Saudi Arabia then you might as well go and play over there for a while and not worry about working ever again.What a waste of talent.