Acrobat7
Full Member
Because Napoli and Chelsea are balancing their books with each other?If Osimhen was available why the feck weren't we all over that?
Because Napoli and Chelsea are balancing their books with each other?If Osimhen was available why the feck weren't we all over that?
If Osimhen was available why the feck weren't we all over that?
He would be too expensive.If Osimhen was available why the feck weren't we all over that?
He would be too expensive.
1 hot season equals a decent career?So Lukaku is being dug up from the Chelsea strikers graveyard to be replaced by a fresh body.
RIP Victor, you had a decent career.
Suspect this is close to the truthBecause Napoli and Chelsea are balancing their books with each other?
But then we'd have had no strikers last year and only 1 this year...maybe I'm in the minority, but I'd rather have Højlund and Zirkzee over just Osimhen.Yeah we spend 75M on a striker already last season. And 35M on one this one. If we had not, maybe we could have gone for Osimhen.
Im with you in that minority. Osimhen is just nowhere near worth what Napoli would demand.But then we'd have had no strikers last year and only 1 this year...maybe I'm in the minority, but I'd rather have Højlund and Zirkzee over just Osimhen.
No way Napoli will give him away on the cheap.
His agent seems like a joy to work with
The fact that Napoli are willing to value Lukaku anywhere between £30-£40m at the age of 31 on those crazy wages, whilst we can't get anyone to offer us a packet of crisps for Case or Sancho boils my blood.Honesty 65m€ or so plus Lukaku who is actual deadwood for them is a good deal for Chelsea, if you're convinced he's all that.
1 hot season equals a decent career?
Only if we sort out our supply line to the strikers. Otherwise it doesn’t matter if it’s him, Hojlund, Ruud or Willy fecking Wonka upfrontGood. Let Chelsea continue with Jackson upfront. I wish we hadn't wasted so much money over the years to the point we're left requiring to sell to buy, we should be all over this. He's only 25, would take our attack to the next level.
TBF Willy is a chocolate guy not a strikerOnly if we sort out our supply line to the strikers. Otherwise it doesn’t matter if it’s him, Hojlund, Ruud or Willy fecking Wonka upfront
Seems foolish to be saying that when the package is exactly what the problem is. There aren't many suitors for Osi this summer, and likely won't ever be unless he becomes significantly cheaper.
Good. Let Chelsea continue with Jackson upfront. I wish we hadn't wasted so much money over the years to the point we're left requiring to sell to buy, we should be all over this. He's only 25, would take our attack to the next level.
That is outrageous, his all round game is a different level, even with the same level of service, his output would have been comfortably better.He really wouldn't do much more than Hojlund did last season
That is outrageous, his all round game is a different level, even with the same level of service, his output would have been comfortably better.
"even with the same level of service" do you have any evidence for that? Or you just really undervalue how bad Hojlund had it last season.
Maybe Osimhen would've marginally been better last season, but the Dane is the better prospect. You don't buy a 25 year old striker when you have a similar 21 year old who will probably develop into something better than the 25 year old currently is.
Interesting, Athletic jumped the gun somewhat?
Always makes me laugh when people just assume better strikers would have been banging them in for fun for us last year, when Hojlund literally was never passed the ball in the final third and the majority of his (respectable) goal tally were solo efforts of mostly his own work.
Swap Hojlund and Nunez last year and the narratives would be far different.
What evidence do you have that Hojlund would be better than Osimhen."even with the same level of service" do you have any evidence for that? Or you just really undervalue how bad Hojlund had it last season.
Maybe Osimhen would've marginally been better last season, but the Dane is the better prospect. You don't buy a 25 year old striker when you have a similar 21 year old who will probably develop into something better than the 25 year old currently is.
What evidence do you have that Hojlund would be better than Osimhen.