Victor Gyökeres

26 y.o Gyokeres? scored a feckton of goals in the past 2 years? I dont know... we shouldnt sign old players..

27 y.o Rashford? had social media issues? scored a lot less? still unsure if he is a CF or a LF? yeeesss come on Rashy lad.
 
Last edited:
26 y.o Gyokeres? scored a feckton of goals in the past 2 years? I dont know... we shouldnt sign old players..

27 y.o Rashford? had social media issues? scored a lot less? still unsure if he is a CF or a LF? yeeesss come on Rashy lad.
Any excuses to lump on Rashford I guess? feck are you going on about
 
Any excuses to lump on Rashford I guess? feck are you going on about
It's a comparison due to age and similar position (forward). My point is, if people have a problem with his age then that's a bit weird isn't it? Our players including Rashy are also on a similar age. And yet we still believe in them. I still believe Rashford will have his purple patch again. So Gyokeres age shouldn't be an issue.

And in fairness, Gyokeres is on a whole another level than Rashford at the moment.
 
26 y.o Gyokeres? scored a feckton of goals in the past 2 years? I dont know... we shouldnt sign old players..

27 y.o Rashford? had social media issues? scored a lot less? still unsure if he is a CF or a LF? yeeesss come on Rashy lad.
Gyokeres who has one or both threads bumped to continue the wankfest every time he knocks in a pen against FC Arouca or Azerbaijan? Rashford who 90% of the caf probably want sold by now?

I don't understand what you're even trying to say.
 
Gyokeres who has one or both threads bumped to continue the wankfest every time he knocks in a pen against FC Arouca or Azerbaijan? Rashford who 90% of the caf probably want sold by now?

I don't understand what you're even trying to say.
I'm sure you understand. Signing players that are on an upward trajectory should be preferable. Haaland also scored against "minnows". He could only score against teams he played against. And attempts to downplay his goalscoring stats by bringing up his age is a bit weird to be honest. Not like he's 35. If people want Rashy out, it's their opinion. I want him to succeed but obviously the best position the club can take is to not rely on him and Hojlund so much. Rashford has a history of being off form for an extended period of time and Hojlund is still young (21). We need more options, someone who has that hunger to score goals. And the criticisms towards Gyokeres have been rather silly so far. It's always about "easy goals against small teams" and age. Meanwhile Bruno is 30 and we're still relying on him.
 
Last edited:
Gyokeres who has one or both threads bumped to continue the wankfest every time he knocks in a pen against FC Arouca or Azerbaijan? Rashford who 90% of the caf probably want sold by now?

I don't understand what you're even trying to say.

He scored 4 goals against Azerbaijan, not just a penalty.

He's played 24 games this season and scored 32 goals, that warrants a wankfest, them numbers are ludicrous.
 
But they are against dog and duck etc. bla bla...
They may as well be? Spending £70 million on a player because they’re scoring goals against Azerbaijan, Estonia and bottom half Portuguese teams is a massive risk. Thats pretty much undeniable.

I’ve watched Portuguese teams get knocked out of European qualifiers by Slovenian teams. The quality of the bottom half of the Portuguese league is definitely equivalent to the bottom of the championship or top of league one.

Luckily Amorim knows him well, so hopefully he should be able to gauge whether his success will translate to the elite of world football, which he would need to be for £70 million. Although, that hasn’t gone well for us in the past.
 
They may as well be? Spending £70 million on a player because they’re scoring goals against Azerbaijan, Estonia and bottom half Portuguese teams is a massive risk. Thats pretty much undeniable.

I’ve watched Portuguese teams get knocked out of European qualifiers by Slovenian teams. The quality of the bottom half of the Portuguese league is definitely equivalent to the bottom of the championship or top of league one.

Luckily Amorim knows him well, so hopefully he should be able to gauge whether his success will translate to the elite of world football, which he would need to be for £70 million. Although, that hasn’t gone well for us in the past.
What more could he possibly do to prove he is ready to step up then?
 
Will be a Drogba like signing. Need to go for him in the summer, will have fierce competition but the Amorim connection should put things in our favour.
 
They may as well be? Spending £70 million on a player because they’re scoring goals against Azerbaijan, Estonia and bottom half Portuguese teams is a massive risk. Thats pretty much undeniable.

I’ve watched Portuguese teams get knocked out of European qualifiers by Slovenian teams. The quality of the bottom half of the Portuguese league is definitely equivalent to the bottom of the championship or top of league one.

Luckily Amorim knows him well, so hopefully he should be able to gauge whether his success will translate to the elite of world football, which he would need to be for £70 million. Although, that hasn’t gone well for us in the past.

He scored 3 against City.
 
To be honest I think Rashford can do what he is doing with a good set up. He is more powerful but that’s it.
 
Again, I'm not making an argument about the player, because I haven't seen enough. It's just about the principle. If Gyokeres (or any other player) is a world class level talent that fits into the system and the squad, I firmly believe we should not be shying away from him, simply because he is aged 27 years old. It should give us five seasons at the highest level at least.

No-one can know where the team is at the end of that period, but if we actually want to make solid improvements to the squad, we cannot keep tinkering with talents that may or may not develop into something useful. Our forward line is full of those already (Garnacho, Højlund, Amad, etc.). That's the recipe for continuing to languish in that 5th to 8th position in the league.

And I think you are far too concerned with resale value. What do you think the resale value of Højlund, Antony, or Zirkzee would be? Hard to say exactly, but we've definitely lost tens of millions on those already, even though we've bought them young. I'd argue someone like Højlund is one of those that probably should have cost £20-30m like you suggest we go after, but in the end he cost £64m plus add-ons. We aren't going to find these forwards for £20-30m that are anything more than talents to be used as subs and rotation. And the squad desperately needs quality players that can improve us now, instead of in 3-4 seasons. Maybe you've noticed we've only scored 12 goals in 11 games in the league.
We overpaid for Hojlund and Anthony through poor planning and the incompetence of our executive team. The way we handled the Branthwaite transfer in the Summer will be the blueprint. Don't want to be serious on a price? OK, we'll look elsewhere...and we did, signing Yoro.

I suppose we'll have to agree to disagree on whether age / profile is a big deal. I think that it's essentially all that matters really if you're looking to build a real platform for success. Quick fixes may seem appealing but it rarely works out and even when they do, the foundations still haven't been addressed.

Very rarely do teams that are successful make a habit of buying in players at 27/28...and...I do believe this debate isn't really about what you or I believe...I'm giving my opinion on what I think INEOS will do, rather than commenting on whether I think it's the right strategy necessarily (I happen to think it is...but that's not important).
 
It's really bizarre that people believe all players develop in the same fashion. If you're not playing for City or United by the age of 25 you must be crap.
I don't think that's the point that most people are making.

Points not being made...

* 27 is ancient and footballers at this age are over-the-hill, or soon to be over-the-hill

* it's impossible to be much better at 25 than you where at 21

Points that are being made...

* INEOS are on record saying they want to "develop the next Mbappe". Signing a 27 year old for £65m+ seems incongruent with this strategy

* Gyokeres is undoubtedly on a red-hot streak BUT he's never played in a top league at any level...not Ligue Un, not Serie A, not La Liga, not the Premier League. We all know there are teams in the Champions League and at International level who are miles below mid-table PL level.

* Whomever signs Gyokeres will give him AT LEAST a four year contract. That means that failure is not an option. There's very little in the way of resale value if he flops. You might be stuck with a player for four seasons who clearly is below the level required to play CF for Manchester United.

* You're not going to improve significantly at 27. We can talk about development from 18-21 and from 21-25...but I firmly believe this is the best Gyokeres will be, ever. Is he a world class CF? I haven't seen enough to say for sure...but if you do pay £65m for a 27 year old, you better had be sure!
 
What more could he possibly do to prove he is ready to step up then?
This Gyökeres thing is starting to get pretty interesting because of how people are so firmly in their ''all the best players play in the big leagues'' mindset. Even though if the season ended today Gyökeres would be the ballon do'r winner by a mile but people are talking like he isn't that good because he doesn't play in a big league. Most goals in a year this century:
Most goals in a year since 2000Goals
Lionel Messi (2012)91
Robert Lewandowski (2021)69
Cristiano Ronaldo (2013)69
Cristiano Ronaldo (2012)63
Cristiano Ronaldo (2014)61
Lionel Messi (2010)60
Cristiano Ronaldo (2011)60
----
Viktor Gyökeres (2024)58 (7 games left)
 
People will always try and question what he is currently doing but what more could he do to?

Nothing. I think he's done all he reasonably could do at Sporting to get a move to a bigger club.

The question is more the balance between price versus risk, and which clubs are in a position to take that chance.

If we were in the position we were in when we signed RVP (having just missed out on a league title on goal difference), then I'd be more inclined to pursue him. You risk him not translating his goals to the PL, but if he does he could be the immediate difference in winning PL/CL titles. And if he doesn't, you still have a title-challenging side.

In our current case though, there's an additional time risk. Our CEO has suggested their ambitious aim is to win a title in the 27/28 season, by which time Gyokeres will be 29+. So in order for him to help us to PL/CL titles, we'd be risking him both not translating his goals to the PL and not sustaining that goalscoring into a career stage where many strikers drop off.

Unless of course you buy him accepting that he quite likely won't be the player to fire you to that eventual league title, and that you'll likely be depending on either Hojlund or a later CF signing to do that by then.

Which is fine, but it should be reflected in the price you're willing to pay. Because we ideally want any big money signings we make to be players we're very confident will be key players both now and 3-5 years time (i.e. when we hope the side we're building will be at its peak and winning major trophies).
 
This Gyökeres thing is starting to get pretty interesting because of how people are so firmly in their ''all the best players play in the big leagues'' mindset. Even though if the season ended today Gyökeres would be the ballon do'r winner by a mile but people are talking like he isn't that good because he doesn't play in a big league. Most goals in a year this century:
Most goals in a year since 2000Goals
Lionel Messi (2012)91
Robert Lewandowski (2021)69
Cristiano Ronaldo (2013)69
Cristiano Ronaldo (2012)63
Cristiano Ronaldo (2014)61
Lionel Messi (2010)60
Cristiano Ronaldo (2011)60
----
Viktor Gyökeres (2024)58 (7 games left)
You need a minute to digest and grasp Messis record from 2012. 22 assists as sugar on top of it all as well.
 
I don't think that's the point that most people are making.

Points not being made...

* 27 is ancient and footballers at this age are over-the-hill, or soon to be over-the-hill

* it's impossible to be much better at 25 than you where at 21

Points that are being made...

* INEOS are on record saying they want to "develop the next Mbappe". Signing a 27 year old for £65m+ seems incongruent with this strategy

* Gyokeres is undoubtedly on a red-hot streak BUT he's never played in a top league at any level...not Ligue Un, not Serie A, not La Liga, not the Premier League. We all know there are teams in the Champions League and at International level who are miles below mid-table PL level.

* Whomever signs Gyokeres will give him AT LEAST a four year contract. That means that failure is not an option. There's very little in the way of resale value if he flops. You might be stuck with a player for four seasons who clearly is below the level required to play CF for Manchester United.

* You're not going to improve significantly at 27. We can talk about development from 18-21 and from 21-25...but I firmly believe this is the best Gyokeres will be, ever. Is he a world class CF? I haven't seen enough to say for sure...but if you do pay £65m for a 27 year old, you better had be sure!
1) Trying to find the next Mbappé does not entail only signing young players with potential and never experienced, older players in their prime. If we did that, we would never compete.

2) He is delivering in the CL and just scored a hattrick against City. Primeira Liga is a top league and players from that league generally transfer well to PL.

3) This applies to every player. Every transfer is a risk, even great players. If he "flops", he will still be one of the best strikers in the PL as he is levels above most PL strikers.

4) Tell that to Drogba, Dzeko, Lewandowski, Vardy etc. Late bloomers like Gyokeres often continue developing as they age. Assuming he doesn't, his current level is still very high and for £65m, it really isn't anything to think about.
 
I don't think that's the point that most people are making.

There have been many posts in his other thread and some in this which imply that because he was at Coventry in his mid 20s, and is a late developer, that he's not all that. Despite there being many examples of footballers who develop in their late 20s, especially strikers in recent years.
 
Nothing. I think he's done all he reasonably could do at Sporting to get a move to a bigger club.

The question is more the balance between price versus risk, and which clubs are in a position to take that chance.

If we were in the position we were in when we signed RVP (having just missed out on a league title on goal difference), then I'd be more inclined to pursue him. You risk him not translating his goals to the PL, but if he does he could be the immediate difference in winning PL/CL titles. And if he doesn't, you still have a title-challenging side.

In our current case though, there's an additional time risk. Our CEO has suggested their ambitious aim is to win a title in the 27/28 season, by which time Gyokeres will be 29+. So in order for him to help us to PL/CL titles, we'd be risking him both not translating his goals to the PL and not sustaining that goalscoring for into an age where many strikers drop off.

Unless you buy him accepting that he quite likely won't be the player to fire you to that eventual league title, and that you'll likely be depending on either Hojlund or a later CF signing to do that.

Which is fine, but it should be reflected in the price you're willing to pay. Because we ideally want any big money signings we make to be players we're very confident will be key players both now and 3-5 years time (i.e. when we hope the side we build will be at it's peak).
The thing of waiting for three or four years to challenge is just excuses for bad recruitment. Given the chances we were creating under Ten Hag, early on in the season, why shouldn't we be in the mix if we had a prolific world class striker?

We now have to wait for the green strikers we have to come good whilst resolving other squad and what clearly were coaching issues.

If we get our next batch of signings spot on there is no reason we can't break into that top 3 because no one is consistent enough. We will spend big money in the summer, it's upon Berrada and Ashworth to ensure that it's spent right, we wouldn't have gone all the way for a young exciting manager only to tell him to slog it out for the next three seasons.
 
The doubts based on the level of leagues he has played in are totally valid.

Everyone would be delighted if we sign him and he turns out to be as good as everyone hopes. Just become a bit jaded with big money signings so will wait and see.

To be honest there are so few strikers out there who tick all the boxes that taking a gamble on a striker from the Portuguese league for big money makes sense.

I'd be shocked if we don't sign him unless Amorim suddenly gets a lot more out of Hojlund.
 
The doubts based on the level of leagues he has played in are totally valid.

Everyone would be delighted if we sign him and he turns out to be as good as everyone hopes. Just become a bit jaded with big money signings so will wait and see.

To be honest there are so few strikers out there who tick all the boxes that taking a gamble on a striker from the Portuguese league for big money makes sense.

I'd be shocked if we don't sign him unless Amorim suddenly gets a lot more out of Hojlund.
Agree with this and he is not exactly new to English football. You suspect he fixed whatever was holding him back under Amorim and will be confident that he can perform at the highest level. We just need to have our own people run the rule on him and avoid another Antony situation.
 
We overpaid for Hojlund and Anthony through poor planning and the incompetence of our executive team. The way we handled the Branthwaite transfer in the Summer will be the blueprint. Don't want to be serious on a price? OK, we'll look elsewhere...and we did, signing Yoro.

I suppose we'll have to agree to disagree on whether age / profile is a big deal. I think that it's essentially all that matters really if you're looking to build a real platform for success. Quick fixes may seem appealing but it rarely works out and even when they do, the foundations still haven't been addressed.

Very rarely do teams that are successful make a habit of buying in players at 27/28...and...I do believe this debate isn't really about what you or I believe...I'm giving my opinion on what I think INEOS will do, rather than commenting on whether I think it's the right strategy necessarily (I happen to think it is...but that's not important).
Obviously, I agree that the entire transfer strategy shouldn’t be buying expensive players in their late twenties. It needs to be a healthy mix, skewing more towards younger players. But if a special player comes along that can be gotten and potentially improve our situation drastically, it’s just worth pursuing in my opinion. And I also fundamentally don’t consider a player that has just turned 27 to be a quick fix. At that age, it’s not another Van Persie, Casemiro or Varane.

But let’s see what happens. Maybe you are right that INEOS will not be interested at all.
 
There have been many posts in his other thread and some in this which imply that because he was at Coventry in his mid 20s, and is a late developer, that he's not all that. Despite there being many examples of footballers who develop in their late 20s, especially strikers in recent years.

Some players develop late, but it's more common to develop earlier. In reality most strikers hit their career peak goalscoring seasons in their early/mid 20's.

That late development seeing your goal output double and then triple in successive seasons is much rarer still. And for that rapid development to see you hit these Ballon d'Or level heights, rarer again. And now people are asking if he can not only sustain a similar level for several more seasons, but also do so while moving from the Portugese league to a much stronger league.

If Gyokeres is the real deal and actually manages to do that, then he's an extreme outlier.

Which he may well be, outliers exist. But I think it's pretty rational for people to wonder how much of a factor him coincidentally moving to a weaker league before that goal explosion occurred might be.

Especially if a team is looking to pay the sort of fee for him where they need it to barely be a factor at all.
 
Some players develop late, but it's more common to develop earlier. In reality most strikers hit their career peak goalscoring seasons in their early/mid 20's.

That late development seeing your goal output double and then triple in successive seasons is much rarer still. And for that rapid development to see you hit these Ballon d'Or level heights, rarer again. And now people are asking if he can not only sustain a similar level for several more seasons, but also do so while moving from the Portugese league to a much stronger league.

If Gyokeres is the real deal and actually manages to do that, then he's an extreme outlier.

Which he may well be, outliers exist. But I think it's pretty rational for people to wonder how much of a factor him coincidentally moving to a weaker league before that goal explosion occurred might be.

Especially if a team is looking to pay the sort of fee for him where they need it to barely be a factor at all.
It's fine to be cautious, but there are posts which aren't doing that. They're just writing him off completely.
 
What more could he possibly do to prove he is ready to step up then?
I’m not saying he’s not ready to step up, I’m saying the step up is absolutely giant and it’s a huge risk to spend £70 million on a player stepping up from Portugal.
 
This is a mistake that should be easy to avoid.

If none of Amorim, the new structure, and the scouting department are smart enough to do that, then that would be a huge red flag for me, despite me probably being one of the most optimistic posters on here about Ineos and our scouts' abilities.
 
For those who look down on his record in the Championship, would you say that the Primeira Liga is a comparable level? He seems to he tearing it up in Europe and internationally too.
 
Nothing. I think he's done all he reasonably could do at Sporting to get a move to a bigger club.

The question is more the balance between price versus risk, and which clubs are in a position to take that chance.

If we were in the position we were in when we signed RVP (having just missed out on a league title on goal difference), then I'd be more inclined to pursue him. You risk him not translating his goals to the PL, but if he does he could be the immediate difference in winning PL/CL titles. And if he doesn't, you still have a title-challenging side.

In our current case though, there's an additional time risk. Our CEO has suggested their ambitious aim is to win a title in the 27/28 season, by which time Gyokeres will be 29+. So in order for him to help us to PL/CL titles, we'd be risking him both not translating his goals to the PL and not sustaining that goalscoring into a career stage where many strikers drop off.

Unless of course you buy him accepting that he quite likely won't be the player to fire you to that eventual league title, and that you'll likely be depending on either Hojlund or a later CF signing to do that by then.

Which is fine, but it should be reflected in the price you're willing to pay. Because we ideally want any big money signings we make to be players we're very confident will be key players both now and 3-5 years time (i.e. when we hope the side we're building will be at its peak and winning major trophies).
You don’t think that is too narrow a scope? A striker that has us perennially competing in the CL would be worth £65m to us right now, for example, let alone competing and/or winning the big trophies.

Most would agree our strike force is a long way off being competitive and upholding its end in the team; a striker that has us looking/being truly threatening again would be a leap and boon from where we currently are.

Whether Gyökeres himself is the man is up for debate, but our need for such a player - one that should already be at the club (Højlund should never, ever have been left up the creek) of that kind of age profile (finished product, ready and able to bear the brunt of the pressure and responsibility) should never have materialised as a talking point, but for shocking planning and squad mismanagement.

27/28 is a long time away in football terms; it has the look of an organic turning point where either Højlund is at least par and equally rotated with who we would buy, or sold on with a replacement occupying the role he once did when he arrived at the club. Ideally, Højlund proves himself to be the man by then and has either usurped the “now” player or is giving him a serious run for his money.

Given the brevity of striking options out there, this S-tier forward of the perfect age profile would be feverishly sought after and mightn’t even want the gig here. Point is, us waiting on a perfect storm, acting as though our needs now are not verging on desperate, is not particularly viable or realistic. Such things are done from positions of strength, not weakness.
 
This is a mistake that should be easy to avoid.

If none of Amorim, the new structure, and the scouting department are smart enough to do that, then that would be a huge red flag for me, despite me probably being one of the most optimistic posters on here about Ineos and our scouts' abilities.
Why do you think signing one of the most sought after strikers in Europe for £65m is a mistake?
 
There have been many posts in his other thread and some in this which imply that because he was at Coventry in his mid 20s, and is a late developer, that he's not all that. Despite there being many examples of footballers who develop in their late 20s, especially strikers in recent years.
Is there? Strikers that have been a championship level player at 25 and then suddenly become world class players for the last few years of their career?

I’m sure there’s probably some, but I doubt the buying club risked £70 million on them.
 
People are acting like no world-class talents come out of the Portuguese league just because half of the clubs aren't that great. Weird take
 
For those who look down on his record in the Championship, would you say that the Primeira Liga is a comparable level? He seems to he tearing it up in Europe and internationally too.
I think the City game shows glimpses of what you can expect if he's to play in PL. And in my opinion, despite Sporting not having a lot of possession, he didn't look out of place despite carrying burden on his shoulders after fecking up the first chance. I think that's a better indicator whether a player is ready or not. And his first goal was a proper CF goal.
Is there? Strikers that have been a championship level player at 25 and then suddenly become world class players for the last few years of their career?

I’m sure there’s probably some, but I doubt the buying club risked £70 million on them.
Maybe Vardy? granted he stayed longer than I thought he would have. Also wasn't Hojlund signed for ~60 million? I think the CF market is very competitive... even if we are to spend it on a potential, it's gonna be ~40-50 million easily. If he's a top talent. So in the end CF isn't exactly a position you'd want/can penny pinch. Unless if it's a raw talent, in which case we be better go with academy players. Normally I'd be supportive of talents like Zirkzee. Unfortunately he looks slow and we've seen it time and time again with slow players in PL.... unless if they're exceptional at everything else (touch, finishing, and positioning) then they usually struggle. Applies to both forwards and wingers.
 
The main thing is that Hojlund showed he is quite clinical in front of goal. Few weeks ago i read that he had the best % of finding the back of the net in the league since he come to United. I Think his movement is a problem, that’s why he is not getting into a lot of those chances, always hidding behind the defenders but being big, strong and fast and still 21 he has a lot of attributes to be great stiker. Most of our attacks recently were concentrated to get the ball to our wingers and they will try to score, we could not create enough for a centre forward but in Amorim’s system wingers are mostly trying to create chances for ST rather then scoring themselves all the time so there is a chance for him.

I Think Zirkzee has a potential but the league is still new and fast to him ( similar thing happend to Vidic and Evra at the beggining) so i would not cross him out yet.

They both young, still have good reputation especially in Serie A, even though we paid quite a lot for them their wages are on normal level under 90 k per week so if they somehow do not make it till the end of the season we could easily get lot of money back for both of them and then use it to buy Gyokeres or some other player.

So we are in a win win situation if they can make it for the next few months we will have our strikers sorted and do not need anyone if neither of them will be good enough for Amorim we can sell them easily for combined 60-80 mil and use it to buy someone who could be our main man.

Just wait and see :)
 
For those who look down on his record in the Championship, would you say that the Primeira Liga is a comparable level? He seems to he tearing it up in Europe and internationally too.

I think on average it's worse than the Championship. I don't see how any team other than Porto, Benfica and Sporting would do well in the Championship.
 
I think on average it's worse than the Championship. I don't see how any team other than Porto, Benfica and Sporting would do well in the Championship.
Braga and Guimarães are pretty decent as well. But all the 3 of the top teams are way above championship-level
 
I think on average it's worse than the Championship. I don't see how any team other than Porto, Benfica and Sporting would do well in the Championship.
Possibly. I'd argue that the top 3 in Portugal are comfortably better than anything the Championship has to offer, while Braga would be one of the best sides in the Championship. The rest of the teams are debatable. However, I think it's pretty obvious that Gyokeres has gone up levels since joining Sporting. He was one of the best strikers in the Championship anyway.