Berbaclass
Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Machine.
Hes apparently available for 60-70m euros would be cheaper than Hojlund. Its a no brainerI think if we can target Osimhen on a cheaper deal id' take that over spending alot of money on the hottest striker of the season.
No doubt he looks class but i watched a video where approximately 11 of his goals were penalties & it made me feel like his price maybe inflated.
However, one benefit is that he has played in the country & manager before.
Depends what we want upfront. Gyatkeres may or may not be a dud if he gets the big move, but the man lives and breathes classic no.9 play. Given the personnel (mainly Fernandes) — I imagine we’d be looking for a player who will benefit from all his chance creation.
Isak makes more sense if the plan is to start getting combination play going.
Gyokeres is yet to score as many league goals as him, though. Not saying he is as good, but he was a very good goal scorer for Sporting in his first two seasons for them.People going on about fecking Bas Dost? When was he ever anywhere near this prolific?
1. I honestly don't know much about his level. I haven't seen a lot of him besides highlights and compilations. I'm just saying that in principle, if we are confident about the player, we shouldn't be sacred of signing a 27 year old. I am not saying Gyokeres is definitely the guy to go for.Few points on that...
1. You say "established"...what level is Gyokeres at exactly? At 27, he's unlikely to be improving, so how good is he right now? He was at Coventry four seasons ago and has had a great time at Sporting in the Portuguese league. Are you absolutely convinced he's the level we need because at 27, this is as good as he's going to get and....
2. If it doesn't work out, then we're lumbered with another expensive signing on a 5YR deal (likely to offset PSR) and will be looking at taking a big loss because
...
3. At 29+ there will be very very limited resale value for a player who has proven to not be elite level and is likely on a salary that prices out mid-tier clubs.
4. Also consider, where was Gyokeres relative to Hojlund at 21? How would Gyokeres potentially impact the development of a lad we've spent £70m on and who has shown promise (consider where Watkins, Solanke, Toney, Kane etc...where at his age and how many goals they have scored in the PL)
So if I was thinking about this like a Director of Football, I'm concluding that it's too big of a gamble and we'd be better served signing two £30m strikers between the ages of 19 and 24, and seeing how they develop....because we can pay lower wages, they'll retain resale value and we can "fail fast" i.e. move them on quickly if it doesn't work out + their ceiling could ultimately be higher.
People going on about fecking Bas Dost? When was he ever anywhere near this prolific?
Recruit him and the scouting team of Sporting.This guy was in a Coventry shirt last season... let that sink in for a second.
This guy was in a Coventry shirt last season... let that sink in for a second.
In two of Dost's three full seasons at Sporting he returned league goals at a better rate than Gyokeres did last season. 0.94 & 1.13 versus 0.90 goals per 90.
Gyokeres has been better again this season (1.48), but it's still only November. Whether he can sustain that better-than-Dost rate of returns for a full season remains to be seen.
Regardless, I don't think people are saying he isn't better than Bas Dost, especially as he has performed better in the CL. Just that the concerns about goal tallies being inflated by the Portugese league are legit.
I agree. Sell Zirkzee and have Højlund and GyokeresAbsolute must buy. Unless Hojlund becomes world class under Amorim.
Gyokeres is at a good age too to allow Hojlund time to grow.
He scored a hattrick against City. But somehow "probably wont make it in england". He shat all over your best club. Haaland looked like shit compared to him in that game.
He scored a hattrick against City. But somehow "probably wont make it in england". He shat all over your best club. Haaland looked like shit compared to him in that game.
Not sure that can be an argument? It is either true or it is not.Id argue nearly a third of all his goals are from penalties.
The fact is though, clubs do care about signing players who are 25+ for big money because it makes it incredibly difficult to move on from a bad transfer. We know this is true from watching basically any of the football documentaries and listening to conversations between executives.1. I honestly don't know much about his level. I haven't seen a lot of him besides highlights and compilations. I'm just saying that in principle, if we are confident about the player, we shouldn't be sacred of signing a 27 year old. I am not saying Gyokeres is definitely the guy to go for.
2./3. Yeah, things can go to shit if we sign an expensive player. It's up to the scouting department to make the best decision possible. Doesn't mean we shouldn't do it, if we come to the conclusion that he's the right guy.
4. I couldn't care less, where Gyokeres was at 21. We would be buying the player he is now. Some players develop early, others later. And frankly, the impact on Højlund's development, as well as what we have paid for him, should be the least of our concerns, when it comes to signing another striker. Højlund isn't cutting it right now, and that's a fact. He'd probably be better served with a supporting role for a few years than what he is currently doing.
Sure, point me to the two strikers that are both between 19-24 and gettable for £30m each. The last two we have gotten were far more expensive and are not looking too hot right now.
They're not.I dont get this.
2 of his hattrick goals were penalties vs City.
Id argue nearly a third of all his goals are from penalties.
Its similar with Jonathan David.
Penalties are still goals too, and when you're scoring and contributing at the rate he does it isn't a negative.They're not.
This season he has scored 6 of 16 in the league alone, so you could make a case here but in general, they aren't. In the last three seasons he has scored 66 league goals, and 14 are penalties.
This guy was in a Coventry shirt last season... let that sink in for a second.
Again, I'm not making an argument about the player, because I haven't seen enough. It's just about the principle. If Gyokeres (or any other player) is a world class level talent that fits into the system and the squad, I firmly believe we should not be shying away from him, simply because he is aged 27 years old. It should give us five seasons at the highest level at least.The fact is though, clubs do care about signing players who are 25+ for big money because it makes it incredibly difficult to move on from a bad transfer. We know this is true from watching basically any of the football documentaries and listening to conversations between executives.
It's not about Gyokeres' physical condition - it's about the fact that this will be his last big contract. If we sign him at 27, let's face it, it will be a 5 year deal...or at least a 4 year + 1. It will need to be because we're not too hot on PSR right now.
So we're lumbered with him, for better or for worse. I have seen the bloke play once, you have seen a handful of highlight reels...we're not talking about a man who's been tearing up European football for 6 or 7 years, we're talking about a man who's ran very hot for 18-months BUT it must be noted very few of those goals have come against top opposition.
I go back to it...I can't see INEOS wanting to take the gamble, it doesn't fit with what they have said previously about developing the next XYZ.
And...it's not down to me to name which talented young strikers we should go for instead...I watch United and England + whoever they're playing these days...I would hope our Scouts have a broader depth of knowledge than me! It's more of a comment on a profile than a specific player anyway...signing players in the £20-£30m bracket allows you to easily move on if it doesn't work.
That's the essence of it yeah. He's obviously just kicked on a few years later than most. It happens.It's really bizarre that people believe all players develop in the same fashion. If you're not playing for City or United by the age of 25 you must be crap.
What’s more, that the host of elite clubs now looking at him didn’t get the memo that he’s not for them due to his age and how he got to the point they are interested in the first place.It's really bizarre that people believe all players develop in the same fashion. If you're not playing for City or United by the age of 25 you must be crap.
They obviously aren't aware that he played for Coventry recently.What’s more, that the host of elite clubs now looking at him didn’t get the memo that he’s not for them due to his age and how he got to the point they are interested in the first place.
I completely agree. I think the poster would have a point if one third of his goals were penalties and he didn't score much from open play, but it's isn't the case for Gyokeres. He scores a lot of goals from open play and is a great penalty taker so he is definitely one we should be aiming to get.Penalties are still goals too, and when you're scoring and contributing at the rate he does it isn't a negative.
Let's get to a level first before the next levelWe need this guy next season to take us to the next level. We’ve not had a goal machine for years.
What do you mean? Did you see that training video we probably won’t lose ever again.Let's get to a level first before the next level
There’s always a level. It’s just about which one we’re at. We’re probably middle. We’re still winning trophies. The next levels challenging for the Pl and CL regular.Let's get to a level first before the next level