Crimson King
Full Member
- Joined
- May 11, 2013
- Messages
- 4,264
I really don't think it is. I'm not sure he's good enough. Better than what we have now? Definitely. Proven at the top level? No.this seems like a good price to me
I really don't think it is. I'm not sure he's good enough. Better than what we have now? Definitely. Proven at the top level? No.this seems like a good price to me
I really don't think it is. I'm not sure he's good enough. Better than what we have now? Definitely. Proven at the top level? No.
I really don't think it is. I'm not sure he's good enough. Better than what we have now? Definitely. Proven at the top level? No.
Why does it need to be a striker? We need elite attackers. I would argue Liverpool don't have an elite striker, but signed very good (Jota, Diaz) to emerging WC players (Salah) to aid their goal output, and all for under £60m. In fact, when they tried to sign a big money striker in Nunez it backfired. And what league did he look shit hot in?Strikers proven at the top level who are under contract and the club don’t wish to sell don’t go for this price
Who do you feel is proven that's obtainable
Why does it need to be a striker? We need elite attackers. I would argue Liverpool don't have an elite striker, but signed very good (Jota, Diaz) to emerging WC players (Salah) to aid their goal output, and all for under £60m. In fact, when they tried to sign a big money striker in Nunez it backfired. And what league did he look shit hot in?
We should not be spending anything over £40m on Gyokeres, in my opinion. I just don't think he's at that top level. If we can't get him for that then we should sign someone old but serviceable to take the pressure off of Højlund. Or, if we're starting to move on from Højlund, then we should sign another emerging talent, but whoever we think is the Yoro of young strikers.
I don't think we'll regret letting Gyokeres go to Arsenal or Liverpool, not in the long term, especially if they splash £60m+ on him. I'd rather we held tight and tried to sign the next Haaland, or preferably the next Kane.
Signing a top striker isn't going to transform this team anyway. There's still too many other positions that need to be improved, or where young talent still needs time to mature.
Why does it need to be a striker? We need elite attackers. I would argue Liverpool don't have an elite striker, but signed very good (Jota, Diaz) to emerging WC players (Salah) to aid their goal output, and all for under £60m. In fact, when they tried to sign a big money striker in Nunez it backfired. And what league did he look shit hot in?
We should not be spending anything over £40m on Gyokeres, in my opinion. I just don't think he's at that top level. If we can't get him for that then we should sign someone old but serviceable to take the pressure off of Højlund. Or, if we're starting to move on from Højlund, then we should sign another emerging talent, but whoever we think is the Yoro of young strikers.
I don't think we'll regret letting Gyokeres go to Arsenal or Liverpool, not in the long term, especially if they splash £60m+ on him. I'd rather we held tight and tried to sign the next Haaland, or preferably the next Kane.
Signing a top striker isn't going to transform this team anyway. There's still too many other positions that need to be improved, or where young talent still needs time to mature.
I'm not disagreeing with that, I think the lack of an established striker has probably held back Højlund's development.United have the right band now of expierenced and young players like Garnacho, Diallo, Mainoo, Yoro, Ugarte, Hojlund, Zirkzee, Collyer .De Ligt and martinez only 25 as well. Our team is very young. We 100% need a proper striker as soon as possible to help these players and not another project like Hojlund who is not good enough to lead the line. We desperatly need an established striker, a left wing back and another CM to help Ugarte and Mainoo.
I really don't think it is. I'm not sure he's good enough. Better than what we have now? Definitely. Proven at the top level? No.
Jonathan David is a good shot, contract expiring at the end of the season.
What would it take to sign him now I wonder
Don’t think he’s the right type of profile we should be signing. We need a physical front man. Gyokeres is like Haaland with his physique.Jonathan David is a good shot, contract expiring at the end of the season.
Don’t think he’s the right type of profile we should be signing. We need a physical front man. Gyokeres is like Haaland with his physique.
Goykeres is more physical from what I watched of them. But I did not watch much of David.David is more physical than Gyokeres! He's got pace, strength and is great in the air. Been consistent for Lille for a while now.
Can’t say I’ve seen much of David play to be fair. But I’ve seen Gyokeres and he’s a monsterDavid is more physical than Gyokeres! He's got pace, strength and is great in the air. Been consistent for Lille for a while now.
Why does it need to be a striker? We need elite attackers. I would argue Liverpool don't have an elite striker, but signed very good (Jota, Diaz) to emerging WC players (Salah) to aid their goal output, and all for under £60m. In fact, when they tried to sign a big money striker in Nunez it backfired. And what league did he look shit hot in?
We should not be spending anything over £40m on Gyokeres, in my opinion. I just don't think he's at that top level. If we can't get him for that then we should sign someone old but serviceable to take the pressure off of Højlund. Or, if we're starting to move on from Højlund, then we should sign another emerging talent, but whoever we think is the Yoro of young strikers.
I don't think we'll regret letting Gyokeres go to Arsenal or Liverpool, not in the long term, especially if they splash £60m+ on him. I'd rather we held tight and tried to sign the next Haaland, or preferably the next Kane.
Signing a top striker isn't going to transform this team anyway. There's still too many other positions that need to be improved, or where young talent still needs time to mature.
Can you please point me to a priven at the top level available attacker and most importantly with a reasonable price tag?
Can’t say I’ve seen much of David play to be fair. But I’ve seen Gyokeres and he’s a monster
Oh god, not Jonathan David again. every season he comes up like Gaitan, and every season he's always playing for some schmuck average club. The man ain't good enough, he'll never be good enough. He's exactly at the kind of club he should be.David is more physical than Gyokeres! He's got pace, strength and is great in the air. Been consistent for Lille for a while now.
David won't work as a striker. He is not very good with his back to the goal. He is a Lacazette type of player.Can’t say I’ve seen much of David play to be fair. But I’ve seen Gyokeres and he’s a monster
Every season he has played for Lille and in the Champions league so not ideal WTF you are on about. Gykores is playing for Sporting. His contract is expiring, I expect some big clubs to be in for him in the summer.Oh god, not Jonathan David again. every season he comes up like Gaitan, and every season he's always playing for some schmuck average club. The man ain't good enough, he'll never be good enough. He's exactly at the kind of club he should be.
That no genuine top team ever considers him a transfer target tells you all you need to know about his limitations.
Let's move on.
Oh god, not Jonathan David again. every season he comes up like Gaitan, and every season he's always playing for some schmuck average club. The man ain't good enough, he'll never be good enough. He's exactly at the kind of club he should be.
That no genuine top team ever considers him a transfer target tells you all you need to know about his limitations.
Let's move on.
Depends on what he wants wage wise really. Although I don’t think there’s much of a difference between him and VG apart from Serie A having a better reputation (even the much of the league is crap)Can we put Osimhen in that category maybe
I don’t think Watkins is worth what they’d ask given the age and quality. Hes a “good PL striker” but they’ll ask for elite level money.Are we sure Ollie Watkins wouldn't be available in the summer if we're looking for an experienced PL striker? Duran has started 4 of the last 5 matches in the league for them.
Might be one to keep an eye on.
Evan Ferguson available for loan, id take him at least its a bit of competition for Hojlund
Sure 20k a week or whatever he's on, be worth a punt for six months loan. Probably a bit embarrassing for united signing a striker on loan from Brighton is the only thingI take it injuries have completely ravaged him?
We have already had a striker on loan from Burnley. And Shanghai Shenhua.Sure 20k a week or whatever he's on, be worth a punt for six months loan. Probably a bit embarrassing for united signing a striker on loan from Brighton is the only thing
And Helsingborg.We have already had a striker on loan from Burnley. And Shanghai Shenhua.
They won’t sell unless it’s for crazy money and then there’s the whole he’d want to be one of the top paid players at the club, when we’re moving away from big wages.What would it take to sign him now I wonder
I doubt we’d be interested, but I’d like the club to take a punt on him. There’s a player in there, just needs a manager who believes in him. Take him with an option and see how it goes.Evan Ferguson available for loan, id take him at least its a bit of competition for Hojlund
I'm surprised I haven't seen a single mention of Ivan Toney. Might be hard to get as he hasn't been there for long.
And Helsingborg.