VAR, Refs and Linesmen | General Discussion

I think there should be some level of tolerance. Be it 10cm or whatever - It should basically be a section thats "umpires call" and if the lino has given it onside then it's onside, but if he's given it off then it's off.

I don't like this, adding in the lottery of human error to what should be an accurate system seems pointless. Plus, surely the idea of the automatic offside is to eventually do away with job of linesmen. We'd need an automatic system to say when the ball has gone out of play, but that seems much more simple to implement than offside anyway.

Moving the line would be fine. Give that 10cm tolerance for attackers. But there's still a line, so it might as well be level as far as I'm concerned.

Of course, all this depends upon it actually being accurate and quick enough to be useable.
 
I don't like this, adding in the lottery of human error to what should be an accurate system seems pointless. Plus, surely the idea of the automatic offside is to eventually do away with job of linesmen. We'd need an automatic system to say when the ball has gone out of play, but that seems much more simple to implement than offside anyway.

Moving the line would be fine. Give that 10cm tolerance for attackers. But there's still a line, so it might as well be level as far as I'm concerned.

Of course, all this depends upon it actually being accurate and quick enough to be useable.

Fair enough RE: the linesman call system - but I do think there definitely has to be a tolerance for error of some kind. If it is 10cm then at least if someone is offside they are definitely offside... but if its like the above, there is no way that the technology can be 100% correct enough to say that he is 100% offside.

Its why the current tolerance they have for PL offsides works pretty well - nobody has really been complaining anymore about VAR offside decisions anymore (and if they are its usually because the VAR has picked the wrong bloke/pass, or subjective decisions about interference)
 
Never a pen IMO.

However, it wouldn't be suprising if it was given against us.
Of course not, but it's more a handball than the one against De Ligt, and therein lies the problem.
 
If that handball happens in Europe next week against Rangers it will be given, thought the Southampton player had moved his arm towards the ball.
 
1 replay shown, not discussed at half time, manager and club don’t say anything after the game. Everything is going against us recently.
 
Commentary team just spent way more time discussing a shot that hit De Ligt on the back than they did on the United penalty shout.
That’s a reflection of why United are never given anything
 
Bednarek grabbing Zirkzee with both arms after he's turned him and no yellow is diabolical. Referee letting smaller teams do what they want again to control the game.
 
1 replay shown, not discussed at half time, manager and club don’t say anything after the game. Everything is going against us recently.
Been happening for years. Nothing new. It is just recently more fans are actually seeing it. Our club must make some official statement.
 


When is football going to start to take reckless challenges that cause head injuries seriously? Outside the pathetic stopping for clearly uninjured players at corners?
 
Commentary team just spent way more time discussing a shot that hit De Ligt on the back than they did on the United penalty shout.
That’s a reflection of why United are never given anything

I loved the conclusion of that discussion being "it would have been a penalty if the ball had actually hit him on the arm" after we got to watch four slow motion replays of the ball clearly not hitting his arm.

They couldn't just say "not a penalty" and move on.
 
The standard of reffing just isn't there - how did they not see that corner when Ramsdale cleared it, he was off the actual mowed grass it was so behind the line