George Owen
LEAVE THE SFW THREAD ALONE!!1!
The petrol money has reached everyone in football.
*Oil
*Oil
This all dayGenuinely United would’ve been disallowed on all 3 instances with that haha what a farce. Where’s the consistency.
Just brought this up to my mate . They looked at the Newcastle incident once and decided no proof it went out move on , but when it was United they looked and looked and said noWe need a side by side image of the Garnacho one that supposedly crossed the line and this one that didnt
How is that different from ours that was deemed to be out of play?? The ball also clearly went forward when Jolteon headed it. VAR is a joke.
I'm assuming that they "rushed through that" because it was clear to them that they didn't have the proper angle to clearly ascertain that the on-field call (ball in) was wrong. Which is what they should've done when they ruled our goal out, despite having a better angle it wasn't good enough to say with 100% certainty.I mean there's almost guaranteed to be at least one feck up there, no?
VAR spent about 2 minutes looking at whether or not our ball was out of play against Palace, but they rushed through that in about 10 seconds before even zooming in? Then they didn't even draw the lines on the offside?
Fairly clear the pressure of VAR taking too long got them there and it's led to an error.
It was a goal in real time. Ball wasn’t obviously out. No obvious foul. No obvious offside. All correctly called by officials in real time. VAR can feck off.
Gordon was behind the ball when it was played so it doesn't matter.Wasn't the Gordon ahead of the GK? I'm assuming the ball was judged to be played sideways and not forward?
Wasn't the Gordon ahead of the GK? I'm assuming the ball was judged to be played sideways and not forward?
It wasn't a clear foul. The arms in the back didn't cause Gabriel to lean forward like that, he did it himself because he wanted to head the ball behind him. The arms were there but touching someone's back with your arms isn't a foul, and, even more importantly, the call on the field was no foul so they'd have to prove that no foul was a clear and obvious mistake, which it wasn't.Clear foul and nothing obvious about it being in field.
Ah yes, you're right. That's the rule, I got mixed upGordon was behind the ball when it was played so it doesn't matter.
Clear foul and nothing obvious about it being in field.
Generally you don't bump into someone you're running away from in the same direction, they need to catch you and instigate contact. You agree with the decision, that's good for you. I don't as it just wasn't right, over 3 minutes to find a obvious error.
He won't have a case though.Imagine man united got them 3 var calls with a goal, game would be replayed. VAR is a joke and watch Arteta after this game. He's a crying cnut the best of times, he has a reason to moan now.
Straight arms in the back are always given as a foulHe won't have a case though.
Which of the three separate VAR calls in that goal should've been different in your opinion? Ball out, foul or offside?
Gordon was behind the ball when it was played so it doesn't matter.
Wasn't the Gordon ahead of the GK? I'm assuming the ball was judged to be played sideways and not forward?
I think he was just about in line with the ball when the Newcastle player heads it but the ball hits the Arsenal defender and actually hits the Newcastle player before it rolls to Gordon. At the point when it hits the Newcastle player, I think Gordon was ahead of the ball but I don't think VAR even checked it.Yeah he was ahead of the keeper, but allegedly in line with the player that headed it, but didn't draw the lines to show whether that was the case or not.
I think he was just about in line with the ball when the Newcastle player heads it but the ball hits the Arsenal defender and actually hits the Newcastle player before it rolls to Gordon. At the point when it hits the Newcastle player, I think Gordon was ahead of the ball but I don't think VAR even checked it.
The bit you've highlighted in bold is only relevant for Garnacho's pass into the area isn't it? Maguire isn't offside for that. And there's no one the Fulham defender is getting to Garnacho from the free kick with Maguire there or not.
Not if the player bends over by himself to try to head the ball backwards. There isn't anything there showing that the arms pushed him over at all. Not a clear and obvious error IMO.Straight arms in the back are always given as a foul