Red Dreams
Full Member
apparently Senate Republicans were told last week???
...and they wanted to plow through it!
...and they wanted to plow through it!
This is a lot more one-sided than the Messi v Ronaldo thread.
Kavagone.
I suspect the WH and the GOP leadership are making plans right now to replace Kavanaugh and nominate someone like Amy Coney Barrett.
Agreed.Dun dun dun...
He will still get confirmed unless there is a smoking gun or, like 5 more people come out.
Yes.Does that mean there are 3 accusations?
Does that mean there are 3 accusations?
Yes.
If we're to believe Avenatti then yes.
That's not the whole story.She sent a letter to Feinstein requesting privacy, Feinstein did literally nothing about it till it was leaked (probably by a staffer).
That's not the whole story.
Don't doubt that. She and her staff wanted to investigate the claims but didn't want to let the Republicans onto the fact that there was something they had. Leaked it as a hail mary.I'm sure Feinstein deliberately leaked it to throw a wrench into the nomination.
Not sure she could get confirmed given her abortion views.
Hardiman on the other hand would seem a safe bet....although if my suspicions are correct, the Dems are simply doing whatever they can to stall until the mid terms and then use the drama to whip up enough support to retake the Senate, then squash all of Trump's nominees for the next two years.
This is the GOP we are talking about. This is the new norm when it comes to them. I expect nothing but the worst from the Orange One's ass-lickers.This is reaching new sick levels that I didn't think would be reached in 1 week.
Kavanaugh just looks a fecking total cnut. Smug sod you just want to cold cock.
That's not the whole story.
DIANNE FEINSTEIN WITHHOLDING BRETT KAVANAUGH DOCUMENT FROM FELLOW JUDICIARY COMMITTEE DEMOCRATS
Ryan Grim
September 12 2018, 5:24 p.m.
DEMOCRATS ON THE Senate Judiciary Committee have privately requested to view a Brett Kavanaugh-related document in possession of the panel’s top Democrat, Dianne Feinstein, but the senior California senator has so far refused, according to multiple sources familiar with the situation.
The specific content of the document, which is a letter from a California constituent, is unclear, but Feinstein’s refusal to share the letter has created tension on the committee, particularly after Feinstein largely took a back seat to her more junior colleagues last week, as they took over Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings with protests around access to documents.
The letter took a circuitous route to Feinstein, the top-ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee. It purportedly describes an incident that was relayed to someone affiliated with Stanford University, who authored the letter* and sent it to Rep. Anna Eshoo, a Democrat who represents the area.
Different sources provided different accounts of the contents of the letter, and some of the sources said they themselves had heard different versions, but the one consistent theme was that it describes an incident involving Kavanaugh and a woman while they were in high school. Kept hidden, the letter is beginning to take on a life of its own.
Eshoo passed the letter to her fellow Californian, Feinstein. Word began leaking out on the Hill about it, and Feinstein was approached by Democrats on the committee, but she rebuffed them, Democratic sources said. Feinstein’s fellow senators want their own opportunity to gauge whether or not the letter should be made public, rather than leaving it to Feinstein to make that call unilaterally. The sources were not authorized to speak on the record, and said that no senators on the committee, other than Feinstein, have so far been able to view the letter.
KavanOFFKavagone.