Red & White
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2017
- Messages
- 596
Thought he did well we he came on. Looking unlikely he’ll stay past the summer but that was better than his usual poor showing.
He would be fine as a squad player… if we had a decent incumbent in front of him and if he hadn’t had the injuries he’s had, which means he needs games.I think im in a huge minority here but does anybody else see him as useful enough to be a SUBSTITUTE left back. he's quick enough and works hard, his short passing is decent - of course theres room for improvement, especially for what we want from this role in attack, but he had a long lay off and may well still have some improvement in him. I dont seem to rate him as badly as others do
If we were using a traditional left back, sure. We really need attacking players in those positions to move forward, even as a back up.I think im in a huge minority here but does anybody else see him as useful enough to be a SUBSTITUTE left back. he's quick enough and works hard, his short passing is decent - of course theres room for improvement, especially for what we want from this role in attack, but he had a long lay off and may well still have some improvement in him. I dont seem to rate him as badly as others do
Whatever happened to the rumours that he may have been going out on loan?
Last couple of games i saw him doing overlapping runs and busting a gut to keep up with play.Whatever happened to the rumours that he may have been going out on loan?
Whatever happened to the rumours that he may have been going out on loan?
I think im in a huge minority here but does anybody else see him as useful enough to be a SUBSTITUTE left back. he's quick enough and works hard, his short passing is decent - of course theres room for improvement, especially for what we want from this role in attack, but he had a long lay off and may well still have some improvement in him. I dont seem to rate him as badly as others do
No need to re-assess, he was never the required quality before his injury. He was a stop gap signing at best.He's basically had 2 years out of the game. Needs a loan to a less intense league for now and assess again in the summer.
Must mean Alvaro Fernandez is leaving, can't see us loaning out Malacia to play backup.Benfica supposedly taking him on loan.
Sold the backup LB (Beste) which leaves them with only one LB in Alvaro, who's currently injured. He'll be sharing the minutes with Alvaro.Must mean Alvaro Fernandez is leaving, can't see us loaning out Malacia to play backup.
We can't get 20m for him. Contract until 2026. Even 10m would be decent money.Don't think he will fully recover from the injuries he has had, lost alot of pace and it looks like he needs to leave.
Hopefully we can get 20m for him or something and not make a loss on him.
£10m would be insane as it would mean we make profit on him.We can't get 20m for him. Contract until 2026. Even 10m would be decent money.
"A player like him is a full-back. He played with the national team outside and inside, but sometimes in this system, sometimes it's hard for him because he's not so offensive.
"He can play as one of the three defenders, if we have more possession and more control of the games. It's a really difficult context for him. But he's our player and we are going to help him."
I thought 10m euros but won't be even that probably.£10m would be insane as it would mean we make profit on him.
At a guess it'll likely be £3/4m + add ons.
I’d like to think given Malacia’s age where he still has potential, his salary not being huge and going to a weaker league that we could fetch a total package of €8-10 million. Especially if he can have a reasonable loan which I assume it will be.£10m would be insane as it would mean we make profit on him.
At a guess it'll likely be £3/4m + add ons.
Bc we re in the business of getting fleeced. Not being smart about it.According to Fabrizio Romano
Tyrell Malacia leaves Man United to join PSV Eindhoven, Loan move with salary covered until June and buy option clause included, told it’s worth €10m.Understand Man United will also have 30% sell-on clause as part of the deal.
Why only 10M?
Why not? He wasn't very expensive to begin. Didn't really improve when he was here, and then had a huge injury that he is still only getting back up to speed from. Honestly if they pay 10M, that's a lot more than I expected anyone to pay right now.According to Fabrizio Romano
Tyrell Malacia leaves Man United to join PSV Eindhoven, Loan move with salary covered until June and buy option clause included, told it’s worth €10m.Understand Man United will also have 30% sell-on clause as part of the deal.
Why only 10M?
He came for 15m, hasn't looked good enough once in 2.5 years, half of which he was injured to be fair, and is at an age now where no further development is expected. Why would he not have gotten slightly cheaper?According to Fabrizio Romano
Tyrell Malacia leaves Man United to join PSV Eindhoven, Loan move with salary covered until June and buy option clause included, told it’s worth €10m.Understand Man United will also have 30% sell-on clause as part of the deal.
Why only 10M?
You can imagine clubs paying more than £10m for him?According to Fabrizio Romano
Tyrell Malacia leaves Man United to join PSV Eindhoven, Loan move with salary covered until June and buy option clause included, told it’s worth €10m.Understand Man United will also have 30% sell-on clause as part of the deal.
Why only 10M?
It's 10m euro as well, so £8m.According to Fabrizio Romano
Tyrell Malacia leaves Man United to join PSV Eindhoven, Loan move with salary covered until June and buy option clause included, told it’s worth €10m.Understand Man United will also have 30% sell-on clause as part of the deal.
Why only 10M?
Because if we get €10m, we've made €5m profit on him, plus whatever we get with the 30% sell on and his wages covered.According to Fabrizio Romano
Tyrell Malacia leaves Man United to join PSV Eindhoven, Loan move with salary covered until June and buy option clause included, told it’s worth €10m.Understand Man United will also have 30% sell-on clause as part of the deal.
Why only 10M?