What a frankly crazy take.
Shamrow came in here supporting trans athletes (the horror). He suggested at the beginning that there is more to athletic success than just brute strength, and that privilege plays a part. This is clearly the case btw. If you’re born in a village in Africa your chances of becoming an Olympic athlete are far lower than if you’re born in a nice middle class suburb in the USA. you suggest oates responded ‘maturely’. he provided a frankly pathetic response to Shamrow after he mentioned he’d had a stroke when he was young. i mean it’s like you haven’t actually read this thread. no one was actually listening to Sham, they just all rounded up together and got their digs in pretty early. that’s the main reason why the thread has devolved into its current state.
as for me, I suggested that the line of argumentation adopted by many here is rooted in fear and scare mongering. why I say it could be rooted partly in transphobia is because I’ve seen it all before in about 100 debates I’ve had with terfs, who all employ the EXACT same line of argumentation in their position. nobody here wants to reflect on their position, which is probably why when confronted with the idea ones opinion is problematic (even if they don’t necessarily mean it to be) there is an instant lashing out, or failure to even address points raised.
to be clear I’m not saying people are transphobic in here. but if you’re basing your view on fear, you fail to reasonably engage in discussion, and you can’t even agree about some fairly basic trans rights (which are legal, according to the Equality Act in this country) then be prepared to have those views called out.
waiting for another oates post reporting threat now