Transgender Athletes

Surely this only really becomes an issue if the transgender athlete wins a bronze, silver or gold medal at a sport that their biological sex would have given them an advantage? A transgender athlete winning fencing or shooting competition is very different to a transgender athlete winning weightlifting or shotput.
 
What a frankly crazy take.

Shamrow came in here supporting trans athletes (the horror). He suggested at the beginning that there is more to athletic success than just brute strength, and that privilege plays a part. This is clearly the case btw. If you’re born in a village in Africa your chances of becoming an Olympic athlete are far lower than if you’re born in a nice middle class suburb in the USA. you suggest oates responded ‘maturely’. he provided a frankly pathetic response to Shamrow after he mentioned he’d had a stroke when he was young. i mean it’s like you haven’t actually read this thread. no one was actually listening to Sham, they just all rounded up together and got their digs in pretty early. that’s the main reason why the thread has devolved into its current state.

as for me, I suggested that the line of argumentation adopted by many here is rooted in fear and scare mongering. why I say it could be rooted partly in transphobia is because I’ve seen it all before in about 100 debates I’ve had with terfs, who all employ the EXACT same line of argumentation in their position. nobody here wants to reflect on their position, which is probably why when confronted with the idea ones opinion is problematic (even if they don’t necessarily mean it to be) there is an instant lashing out, or failure to even address points raised.

to be clear I’m not saying people are transphobic in here. but if you’re basing your view on fear, you fail to reasonably engage in discussion, and you can’t even agree about some fairly basic trans rights (which are legal, according to the Equality Act in this country) then be prepared to have those views called out.

waiting for another oates post reporting threat now
You seem determined to turn this thread into a row again by throwing around labels and accusing people of bigotry without backing it up.
 
You seem determined to turn this thread into a row again by throwing around labels and accusing people of bigotry without backing it up.

I’m not interested in a row. I was just trying to give @Shamwow some much needed support, and call out some fairly gross inconsistencies in Corinthians’ summary.
 
Surely this only really becomes an issue if the transgender athlete wins a bronze, silver or gold medal at a sport that their biological sex would have given them an advantage? A transgender athlete winning fencing or shooting competition is very different to a transgender athlete winning weightlifting or shotput.
As has been said many times now, you’d have a hard time selling that to the biological female athlete that is replaced on the Olympic team roster.
 
What a frankly crazy take.

I’ve seen it all before in about 100 debates I’ve had with terfs, who all employ the EXACT same line of argumentation in their position. nobody here wants to reflect on their position,

Works both ways. What makes you think you're right and they are wrong?

I've already said a trans woman is a woman. Some folk would say no. Some of those will be bigoted and fools. Some may have a valid argument.

I am not a fan of Jordan Peterson but I understood why he took a position where he didn't want legal imposition on him to accept something. I'm the same in a way. I treat people as I find them but you're not going to force me to accept something I may have an issue with. It isn't personal to an individual but general principle.
 
Surely this only really becomes an issue if the transgender athlete wins a bronze, silver or gold medal at a sport that their biological sex would have given them an advantage? A transgender athlete winning fencing or shooting competition is very different to a transgender athlete winning weightlifting or shotput.
Not really
What if a transgender takes the national place and as a result the female athlete who spent her life training for the event misses out and never gets t compete at the highest level of her sport?
 
Not really
What if a transgender takes the national place and as a result the female athlete who spent her life training for the event misses out and never gets t compete at the highest level of her sport?
Very good point. I hadn't considered that.
 
Surely this only really becomes an issue if the transgender athlete wins a bronze, silver or gold medal at a sport that their biological sex would have given them an advantage? A transgender athlete winning fencing or shooting competition is very different to a transgender athlete winning weightlifting or shotput.
Should also point out, Hubbard already has medaled at international competitions.

“Competing as a woman, Hubbard rose to international prominence by lifting a total of 606 pounds in 2017 to nab the silver medal in the International Weightlifting Federation’s World Weightlifting Championships… (she got injured in 2018)… But she rehabbed, and went on to win two gold medals in the 2019 Pacific Games in Samoa, again putting herself in an international spotlight.”
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/06/21/laurel-hubbard-transgender-tokyo-olympics/?outputType=amp

Hubbard also won gold at the 2017 Australian Open and the 2020 World Cup
 
Last edited:
If you’re born in a village in Africa your chances of becoming an Olympic athlete are far lower than if you’re born in a nice middle class suburb in the USA.

Extremely debatable.
 
Not really
What if a transgender takes the national place and as a result the female athlete who spent her life training for the event misses out and never gets t compete at the highest level of her sport?

Just a friendly suggestion, cool if you instead say "a trans[gender] person". It's like how "a gay" sounds iffy, I hope you understand.
 
Just a friendly suggestion, cool if you instead say "a trans[gender] person". It's like how "a gay" sounds iffy, I hope you understand.
A ok “Someone who is transgender” would be better or am I still in choppy water there?
 
Supporting terfs now? Way to prove my point.

Mate take a step back. It sucks Shammy was banned, and I do side with him on a few issues with that, but you have to see that talking like this is what lead to it. You can be all moral high ground on any subject you like, but the moment you lose the plot and start talking to people like this then it's only going to go one way.
 
Mate take a step back. It sucks Shammy was banned, and I do side with him on a few issues with that, but you have to see that talking like this is what lead to it. You can be all moral high ground on any subject you like, but the moment you lose the plot and start talking to people like this then it's only going to go one way.

He will be back in about 8 hours.
 
He literally sided himself with terf argumentation though, I’m not pointing out anything he hasn’t said himself. It does highlight the cognitive dissonance being displayed from people in here though.

Jesus wept.
 
Apparently 21k people have signed a petition in NZ disagreeing with hubbard being allowed to compete in the womans section if the Olympics.
 
Although it doesn't quite sit right with me, I think the level of testosterone in the body is one measure to determine whether an athlete should compete in men's or women's events. Maybe there are better measures or a range of measures could be used. I do feel sorry for the authorities though because it is almost impossible to find a solution with which everyone will be happy.
 
Everyone in high end sport should be on steroids and PED's, bulldoze the playing field, half of them probably are anyway. Might as well see someone run 100m in 6 seconds, trans or not, at least that way it comes down to individual effort and not just a genetic lottery.
 
Although it doesn't quite sit right with me, I think the level of testosterone in the body is one measure to determine whether an athlete should compete in men's or women's events. Maybe there are better measures or a range of measures could be used. I do feel sorry for the authorities though because it is almost impossible to find a solution with which everyone will be happy.

we also now have a situation where cis women with naturally high testostrone (see Christine Mboma and Beatrice Masilingi) are also being banned from competing. it's ridiculous.
 
I don't really see how trans athletes can be allowed to compete in regular male/female events. It's never going to be fair, and it's impossible for any treatment to make it fair.
 
Everyone in high end sport should be on steroids and PED's, bulldoze the playing field, half of them probably are anyway. Might as well see someone run 100m in 6 seconds, trans or not, at least that way it comes down to individual effort and not just a genetic lottery.

It's still the genetic lottery, drugs aren't magic. In addition you're introducing a new variable; the people who respond best to PEDs benefit more.
 
Everyone in high end sport should be on steroids and PED's, bulldoze the playing field, half of them probably are anyway. Might as well see someone run 100m in 6 seconds, trans or not, at least that way it comes down to individual effort and not just a genetic lottery.

 
It's still the genetic lottery, drugs aren't magic. In addition you're introducing a new variable; the people who respond best to PEDs benefit more.

Plus it’s already down to individual effort. Good genetics alone won’t win medals. Although you could maybe argue that work ethic is heritable. Which is a whole other can of worms.
 
we also now have a situation where cis women with naturally high testostrone (see Christine Mboma and Beatrice Masilingi) are also being banned from competing. it's ridiculous.

1) They're both competing in the 200m.
2) They've both fallen foul of the DSD rules which indicates they may be intersex.

From the IAAF:

The DSD regulations only apply to individuals who are:

  • legally female (or intersex) and
  • who have one of a certain number of specified DSDs, which mean that they have:
    • male chromosomes (XY) not female chromosomes (XX)
    • testes not ovaries
    • circulating testosterone in the male range (7.7 to 29.4 nmol/L) not the (much lower) female range (0.06 to 1.68 nmol/L); and
    • the ability to make use of that testosterone circulating within their bodies (i.e., they are ‘androgen-sensitive’).
 
1) They're both competing in the 200m.
2) They've both fallen foul of the DSD rules which indicates they may be intersex.

From the IAAF:

The DSD regulations only apply to individuals who are:

  • legally female (or intersex) and
  • who have one of a certain number of specified DSDs, which mean that they have:
    • male chromosomes (XY) not female chromosomes (XX)
    • testes not ovaries
    • circulating testosterone in the male range (7.7 to 29.4 nmol/L) not the (much lower) female range (0.06 to 1.68 nmol/L); and
    • the ability to make use of that testosterone circulating within their bodies (i.e., they are ‘androgen-sensitive’).

This really confused me and I've struggle to find the detail online. Maybe you'll know more about it.

So the athletes who fall foul of DSD regulations like Semenya had to get their testosterone down to 5 but the trans weight lifter only had to get hers down to 10.

Where is the logic there?
 
This really confused me and I've struggle to find the detail online. Maybe you'll know more about it.

So the athletes who fall foul of DSD regulations like Semenya had to get their testosterone down to 5 but the trans weight lifter only had to get hers down to 10.

Where is the logic there?

There doesn't appear to be much logic.

I'm not even sure where they got the "middle distance" ban from for DSD runners. You can run events under 400m and over a mile in length, but not those in between?
 
There doesn't appear to be much logic.

I'm not even sure where they got the "middle distance" ban from for DSD runners. You can run events under 400m and over a mile in length, but not those in between?

Yeah that baffled me as well. Different requirements for different disciplines seems very odd.
 
On Laurel Hubbard. I noticed that she 43. Looking at the data I can find the average age of a female Olympic weightlifter is 25. Most of the historical record holders seem to have do their lifts in their early to late 20s. There is one 30 year old lifter at this Olympics doing well. Does anyone know if Laurel winning a silver at the Worlds aged 39 is any kind of record or if there is precedence for someone of this age to be at this level?
 
On Laurel Hubbard. I noticed that she 43. Looking at the data I can find the average age of a female Olympic weightlifter is 25. Most of the historical record holders seem to have do their lifts in their early to late 20s. There is one 30 year old lifter at this Olympics doing well. Does anyone know if Laurel winning a silver at the Worlds aged 39 is any kind of record or if there is precedence for someone of this age to be at this level?

Lu Xiaojun just won gold at the weekend in the M81 class at aged 37. There have been a few older lifters, more on the female side, but I wouldn't say it's common to be successful at that age in Weightlifting. Most of the time by the time these elite lifters reach mid 30s they've been doing the sport ~25 years and their bodies just can't handle the loads anymore, Laurel probably benefitted by not training to the same level during periods of her life.