The current weight lifter in question went from being a decent weight lifter that just couldn’t quite make it to an international team level to being in the top 10 in the world and an Olympic qualifier.
Transgender Athletes
- Thread starter Stack
- Start date
Funny how the outrage is about Shamwow (who has been piled on relentlessly in the last 10 pages) when absolute shit shows of posts like these have gone effectively unnoticed
Theyve been reported
Wow this thread went to shite since I gave up on it a few days ago but just saw the extra pages.
I am more than happy to have a conversation about athletics rules with trans women and men and what would make it a fair competition, but personally what I hate is it has recently just been used as an attack vector vs transgender people and it's a thing where a lot of people wont be able to have a conversation because they already made up their mind and look for evidence to support that and if none is found they resort to "But biology and men will always be men" or "Anyone should be able to compete as a women without hrt"(This one I've heard before but I am pretty sure it may be right-wing trolls trying to make a bad argument a lot of the time)
Were they ganged up on, did people relish impacting their mental health ("are we witnessing a mental breakdown in real time?"), did people continously riducule apparent traumatic experiences?
It's interesting how it's always the people lashing out that gets all the blame. Replying is voluntary, this post didn't double in volume because of one or two people but because people keep replying, and bullying is also voluntary. As you said, reporting is an option, so the people who felt wronged could have reported and kept their mouths shut. They've demonstrated their ability to not speak by not reacting to some very very suspect things being said, but they chose to speak up here. Loudly and repeatedly.
The inclusivity argument is not a convincing one for me. Biological women can flip this morality-based argument back to you: why do you as a MTF transgender want to compete against me?
Current studies have indicated an average of 6% to 12% retained advantage for trans women in terms of performing push ups, sit ups, and running, and that's after two years of hormone therapy, where the IOC currently only requires one.
For some context to what a 6% difference would do, this is 6% off the following women's athletic records:
100m - Currently 10.49. 6% difference takes it to 9.86.
200m - Currently 21.34. 6% difference takes it to 20.06.
400m - Currently 47.60. 6% difference takes it to 44.74.
800m - Currently 1:53.28. 6% difference takes it to 1:46.48.
1500m - Currently 3:50.07. 6% difference takes it to 3:36.27.
High Jump - Currently 2.09m. 6% difference takes it to 2.22m.
Long Jump - Currently 7.52m. 6% difference takes it to 7.97m.
Shot Put - Currently 22.63m. 6% difference takes it to 23.99m.
I'm not sure anyone defended them, and you can hardly blame people for missing those posts when, as I highlighted earlier, it took three weeks for the thread to reach its 10th page, but only 12 hours and 111 posts from Shamwow later to almost double the length of the thread.
Page 1 to Page 2 - 1 day.
Page 2 to Page 3 - 1 day.
Page 3 to Page 4 - 4 days.
Page 4 to Page 5 - 2 days.
Page 5 to Page 6 - 11 days.
Page 6 to Page 7 - 14 hours.
Page 7 to Page 8 - 23 hours.
Page 8 to Page 9 - 8 hours.
Page 9 to Page 10 - 21 hours.
Page 10 to Page 18 - 12 hours.
He wasn't ganged up on though, he chose to engage in lines of argument with multiple people at once, and subsequently received replies from multiple people. The fact that he refused to actually support any of these arguments and very quickly turned to calling people that disagreed with him bigots is a very big part in how this panned out, and it's absolutely laughable that you're now accusing people of bullying because an adult couldn't take a step back and log out of a website when people quite rightly called them up on their conduct.
That's not really an accurate way of reporting it though is it.
Shamwow came in accusing a lot of people of a lot of things (transphobic, and bigots). The discussion to this point was in good faith and good natured. Shamwow himself in a later post said he should have worded what he said better. But don't let the facts get in the way.
Obviously, coming from the angle Shamwow did will annoy other posters who were having a good debate, one that I and a few other posters were following without participating in.
I can flip that again, Because I couldn't compete against men after 10 years of HRT giving me around the same performance as you?
Quite.
I'm saying that the evolution of this thread has been a valiant group effort. Specific accusations didn't start until pretty far into the whole shitshow.
And yes, obviously people were annoyed. They then chose to act on that annoyance by doing a whole lot of sketchy shit themselves. They either weren't annoyed by people talking about throwing their knickers on and compete, or they chose to not act on their annoyance. Plenty of times I have kept replying when I shouldn't have, in fact I'm pretty sure I'm doing it right now (not because of you, but because I shouldn't participate in this thread at all), but when I do I don't blame other people. I get that when it happens it's my own personal failing even if I'm annoyed.
Here we have that Internet way of acting where we respond to specifics by generalities. I'm not talking about calling someone up on their conduct, by all means go ahead. I'm talking about making fun of a perceived mental breakdown, I'm taking of making fun of someone's traumatic childhood experiences, I'm talking about specific things. If you did none of those things then consider I'm not talking about you.
Never amazes me how sorry for themselves people can feel.
I actually explicitly mentioned it in my post, and this is what happens when a decent discussion breaks down into name calling, idiots feel emboldened to make shite posts because others are. Shamwow has been extremely unhelpful in keeping this thread civilised, and this crap of calling someone that makes a tiny mistake in phrasing for a complex topic a transphobe does absolutely no one any favours. I'm pretty sure everyone in the thread understood what was meant by the poster saying that 'a man makes a decision to become a woman', it was simply a case of them not using the correct terms to describe the process of going through physical transition, as mentioned by someone above, Shamwow just decided himself that there was some hidden malice in the sentence and went off on one. He was literally name calling 4 or 5 people at the same time, it's hardly a 'pile on' when people stick up for themselves.
Does the evidence show this?
Specific accusations didn't start, but there's a select few posters who only appeared to be here so that they could throw veiled accusations of transphobia at people, and it's absolutely no surprise that this culminated in people then being outright called transphobes and bigots without any explanation.
If you get that it's your own personal failing for responding to things you perhaps shouldn't when you're annoyed, why are you then making accusations of bullying and someone being ganged up on, when the person in question posted 111 times in 12 hours, 64 times after saying they weren't going to post here anymore?
He brought up his own trauma when it bore no relevance to the topic, and a single poster made a tasteless joke about it. He then went off on one accusing everyone else of supporting bigotry and ableism for daring to question what relevance his personal trauma had to the topic and in doing so drew more unwanted attention.
Despite doing none of the things you said (I also don't think anyone made fun of a perceived mental breakdown because I don't think anyone genuinely believed he was having a mental breakdown, rather they thought he got himself needlessly wound up and ended up making 111 posts in a 12 hour period), I do consider that you were talking about me as well, because you've said he was ganged up on and that it was a group effort to take the thread in this direction, and you know full well that I've been an active participant. So forgive me for wanting some clarification when you start accusing unnamed groups of people bullies.
Neither of those are all that outrageous. There has been examples of able bodied people deceitfully competing in disabled sports. That’s a fact. The bra and knickers comment is a slightly crass way of asking what sort of extent of physical transition is required for a trans woman to compete against cis women. Plus they’re coming from someone who is a good bit older and less likely to be tuned into the nuances of what is/isn’t acceptable when discussing trans issues. If that’s the absolutely worst example of “transphobia” that can be found in all 18 pages of this thread then I think we’ve done pretty well.
Redcafe is a broad church and discussions like this should involve a lot more tolerance on both sides of the debate. Knee-jerk insults from both sides are the reason threads like this so often generate heat but no light.
Last edited:
Had not heard of the Spanish basketball scandal before, but a quick Google says that "Out of the 12 Spanish basketball players, all of whom had said they have an intellectual disability, only two were telling the truth. The other 10 - of whom Ribagorda was one - had no disability at all."
How the Spanish basketball Paralympic team 2000 cheated. (mamamia.com.au)
So at the least, his post that some guy he 'heard' about disabling himself is completely wrong. His post to me implies that someone got an intentional physical disability, as in they broke their leg or something. Has this one case completely discredited disabled sport?
You're giving him too much credit. He wasn't being crass, he was just taking the piss. There was plenty of reasoned discussion on that exact point in the thread already.
I don’t known what specific case he was thinking of. If you google there are loads of examples of cheating in the paralympics. It’s the nature of highly competitive sport, unfortunately. It definitely doesn’t discredit the sport as a whole but the use of deception to win medals is obviously relevant to this discussion. As in, if we already know people will go to crazy lengths of deceit if there’s a medal at the end of it could that also be an issue here? The “bra and knickers” comment was a crude way of making the same point.
By all means disagree with his point but reporting posts and calling him a transphobe seems a bit over the top. And, as I said, if that’s the worst example of transphobia in the 18 pages of this thread then I’d say it’s been well policed.
Besides, if memory serves, he’s already admitted to being quite fond of wearing his wife’s knickers!
Last edited:
Whoosh.
I think you're missing the point here somewhat. The shitshow started with a particular poster (I do believe stepic should shoulder some of the blame as well).
If someone enters a good natured civil discussion with hot takes, and throwing accusations around and people react to that, it's not the fault of the people reacting, it's the fault of the person that's unable to have a civilised discussion.
Again, I'll reiterate, Shamwow himself said he should have worded his posts a lot better to start with.
Primarily, most of the people who reacted to him did so in good faith again, (oates, Alex99, Caro Red etc) and addresses his points maturely and backed up their own without resorting to the same tactics Shamwow was using.
All of these personal insults and the threads still up yet the Limefolio thread was deleted. Where is the justice.
I used to work in Paralympic sport and there has always been controversy regarding classification of athletes .
There were strong rumours regarding various athletes who purposely didn't take their meds (athletes who had CP for example) just so they can get reclassified into a different category, increasing their chances of getting a medal at a games.
There's an interesting BBC panorama programme that was in recently about Classification in Paralympic sport
I also read about wheelchair athletes who would put thumb tacks on the seat of their wheelchair. Apparently even without pain the tissue damage can cause an adrenaline dump which might give them a competitive edge.
Actually, having played mixed doubles in tennis and some co-ed soccer, it is rather enjoyable.
Actually, having played mixed doubles in tennis and some co-ed soccer, it is rather enjoyable.
Ha. As a kid I played hockey because it was a massive men's sport where I was born. At 6th form college (here in UK) there was an option for mixed hockey and I though "ooh haven't played hockey since I was little this sounds good". Spent the year playing hockey with all women. And netball when it was raining. It was actually fun once I had been talked into staying by the teacher.
When I was five or six we had a girl on our hockey team. At that age it's pretty hard to tell though under all the gear.
All that gear?? We talking ice hockey or normal hockey?
Not very competitive in sports, can't be arsed to fight tooth and nails for basket balls. Normally I got to play with the girls.
Love it.
They have no problem man (or should it be) woman handling me. I just dribble the ball and hold the ball high and they'll pretend to jump and block it.
Happy times
Ice hockey (which is normal hockey to be fair), I'm from Canada
Ha fair enough. I meant field hockey (the proper hockey) where it's shorts and PE skirts.
The last pages surely derailed the topic with that particular poster being really invested on a position that wasn't contributing much to his cause. At least I didn't find most of his points convincing or valid at the very least.
I don't agree specifically with the notion of letting transgender athletes compete on the basis there are very few of them that their participation won't affect the big scheme of women's sports. The Olympics is already the top level so just by being selected to attend and represent your country it already means said athlete is displacing every other woman below her. I think it's unfair as they have a performance advantage the other women and it doesn't matter if they get a medal or don't, it still presents as an unfair situation and it already is a disruptive situation within their sport.
I don't agree specifically with the notion of letting transgender athletes compete on the basis there are very few of them that their participation won't affect the big scheme of women's sports. The Olympics is already the top level so just by being selected to attend and represent your country it already means said athlete is displacing every other woman below her. I think it's unfair as they have a performance advantage the other women and it doesn't matter if they get a medal or don't, it still presents as an unfair situation and it already is a disruptive situation within their sport.
What have I just read.
This one takes the cake
What post?
Can we maybe move the discussion on? This is feeling a lot like bullying at this stage.
I agree that the discussion needs to move on, but this is hardly the first time that one poster has been singled out for perhaps making a bit of a fool of themselves, and I think it's a bit off to call it bullying.
It's not like it's happening on a
NATION
NATION
NATION LEVEL
NATIONAL LEVEL
NATIONAL LEVEL
What a frankly crazy take.
Shamrow came in here supporting trans athletes (the horror). He suggested at the beginning that there is more to athletic success than just brute strength, and that privilege plays a part. This is clearly the case btw. If you’re born in a village in Africa your chances of becoming an Olympic athlete are far lower than if you’re born in a nice middle class suburb in the USA. you suggest oates responded ‘maturely’. he provided a frankly pathetic response to Shamrow after he mentioned he’d had a stroke when he was young. i mean it’s like you haven’t actually read this thread. no one was actually listening to Sham, they just all rounded up together and got their digs in pretty early. that’s the main reason why the thread has devolved into its current state.
as for me, I suggested that the line of argumentation adopted by many here is rooted in fear and scare mongering. why I say it could be rooted partly in transphobia is because I’ve seen it all before in about 100 debates I’ve had with terfs, who all employ the EXACT same line of argumentation in their position. nobody here wants to reflect on their position, which is probably why when confronted with the idea ones opinion is problematic (even if they don’t necessarily mean it to be) there is an instant lashing out, or failure to even address points raised.
if you’re basing your view on fear, you fail to reasonably engage in discussion, and you can’t even agree about some fairly basic trans rights (which are legal, according to the Equality Act in this country) then be prepared to have those views called out.
waiting for another oates post reporting threat now
Last edited:
Explains a lot.
Big fan of @stepic managing to write absolutely nothing new but now getting into three paragraphs worth of text and yet again call people transphobes based on absolutely nothing though.
"I'm not saying people are transphobic, I'm just saying that they are exactly like transphobes."
Good job, buddy. 11/10 will likely have to read again multiple times in future posts.
"I'm not saying people are transphobic, I'm just saying that they are exactly like transphobes."
Good job, buddy. 11/10 will likely have to read again multiple times in future posts.