It is if the board are restricting spending and will only allow him to spend a certain amount.
I just hope it's his decision and not the higher ups. I guess we could have a few young players that can fill in, but it's a bit strange we seem to have these holes in the team and no action is happening.
Someone best make sure Rose has the latest version of Google installed.I prefer it this way. If we sign players I want it to be with thought and consideration, not as impulse purchases.
That said we
His is name pronounced like you're saying One Voice with a lisp?
Not too sure, they're both right footed and crossing is neither's main strength. Rashford perhaps could make the transition, doubt it though, and as for Martial I don't see that at all as he's at his most effective coming in onto his right from wide areas.Could Martial and Rashford be shifted to the right wing if we got a definite starter on the left?
I've no idea where people get this idea from. We've spent big several windows in a row. Sure, we won't be paying 200M+ release clauses, but that's just mental.
For every player people don't understand why we don't go for him there's a far more reasonable explanation down the "does Mourinho want him?" path. E.g. being outbid by Spurs for Aurier, there's a million reasons for that more reasonable than financial restraint.
Less Aurier more Perisic, he wanted the move, we were given a price and Ed and the Glazers wouldnt budge on it so we didnt pay it and he's staying. Sounds like a financial retsraint to me.I've no idea where people get this idea from. We've spent big several windows in a row. Sure, we won't be paying 200M+ release clauses, but that's just mental.
For every player people don't understand why we don't go for him there's a far more reasonable explanation down the "does Mourinho want him?" path. E.g. being outbid by Spurs for Aurier, there's a million reasons for that more reasonable than financial restraint.
Where is the evidence of this?
That's what I was thinking - seems strange then that we are not more interested in MahrezThing is I don't really understand the rationale for targeting a left winger, we've already got the (albeit nice) headache of choosing between Rashford and Martial there since both have started the season well and we need to get them enough game time to develop. For the right though we only really have Mata (not preferred position), Lingard (not good enough to start) and I suppose Mkhi if we go 433 (again not preferred position).
Less Aurier more Perisic, he wanted the move, we were given a price and Ed and the Glazers wouldnt budge on it so we didnt pay it and he's staying. Sounds like a financial retsraint to me.
Aurier was also needed for Valencia cover/roatation as we are now aware that Valencia has been playing with an injury and his price tag was miniscule compared to other full back prices this summer. But we've passed up the opportunity and now he will go to spurs, frustrating.
Something isn't right, it has to be for financial reasons though, maybe the Galzers want value in the market with our next few windows after splashing lavishly on players. who knows.
You've spent a shit load of money and whilst you haven't won the things you want, you've still won trophies. Even with all your financial prowess there's got to be a limit to how much you can do. You aren't backed by a country like PSG. You get somewhat close to 200 mill every summer post Fergie, I'm desperate for us to do that this summer cause we've saved up for it and it's the next stop. Insinuating the board are ripping you off is just going to create a needlessly toxic atmosphere. Your owners aren't withholding money.Less Aurier more Perisic, he wanted the move, we were given a price and Ed and the Glazers wouldnt budge on it so we didnt pay it and he's staying. Sounds like a financial retsraint to me.
Aurier was also needed for Valencia cover/roatation as we are now aware that Valencia has been playing with an injury and his price tag was miniscule compared to other full back prices this summer. But we've passed up the opportunity and now he will go to spurs, frustrating.
Something isn't right, it has to be for financial reasons though, maybe the Galzers want value in the market with our next few windows after splashing lavishly on players. who knows.
You've spent a shit load of money and whilst you haven't won the things you want, you've still won trophies. Even with all your financial prowess there's got to be a limit to how much you can do. You aren't backed by a country like PSG. You get somewhat close to 200 mill every summer post Fergie, I'm desperate for us to do that this summer cause we've saved up for it and it's the next stop. Insinuating the board are ripping you off is just going to create a needlessly toxic atmosphere. Your owners aren't withholding money.
Forgetting the 3 years prior to Pogba where we spent huge sums on the likes of AdM, Martial, Mata, Herrera, even Fellaini.8 years of ownership before Pogba was signed?
Hmm I haven't looked at the figures was a ball park guess but I imagine your outlay is up there, without wanting to sound condescending you have the most expensively assembled squad in world football and there's nothing wrong with that. You don't get any trophies for spending nothing and finishing second. I just find it daft to read in to it and slight the owners. Some owners truly are cnuts and invest minimally in the playing squad, yours aren't one of them lately. The players you bought may be questionable but the backing is there.We haven't spent 200m in any of the summers so far.
Forgetting the 3 years prior to Pogba where we spent huge sums on the likes of AdM, Martial, Mata, Herrera, even Fellaini.
Also love how spending £150 million in one summer is now considered financial restraint.
Inter's valuation of Perisic was crazy, we just didn't feel he was worth it and it was a right decision IMO.Less Aurier more Perisic, he wanted the move, we were given a price and Ed and the Glazers wouldnt budge on it so we didnt pay it and he's staying. Sounds like a financial retsraint to me.
Aurier was also needed for Valencia cover/roatation as we are now aware that Valencia has been playing with an injury and his price tag was miniscule compared to other full back prices this summer. But we've passed up the opportunity and now he will go to spurs, frustrating.
Something isn't right, it has to be for financial reasons though, maybe the Galzers want value in the market with our next few windows after splashing lavishly on players. who knows.
We've spent big money in the last 3/4 years, but I feel like with the Perisic transfer, there seems to be a slight shift in our negotiation position. A few summers ago, we'd have likely paid what Inter were asking and got it done, but this summer we not only didn't get that deal done, but also haven't got any alternative options (which Mourinho must have given Woodward before the start of the window). Mourinho has commented about the 4 players he wanted many times this window and it looks like we're only getting 3.Forgetting the 3 years prior to Pogba where we spent huge sums on the likes of AdM, Martial, Mata, Herrera, even Fellaini.
Also love how spending £150 million in one summer is now considered financial restraint.
Hmm I haven't looked at the figures was a ball park guess but I imagine your outlay is up there, without wanting to sound condescending you have the most expensively assembled squad in world football and there's nothing wrong with that. You don't get any trophies for spending nothing and finishing second. I just find it daft to read in to it and slight the owners. Some owners truly are cnuts and invest minimally in the playing squad, yours aren't one of them lately. The players you bought may be questionable but the backing is there.
I'm overrating a player that scored 24 goals in 38 appearances last season?
It is if the board are restricting spending and will only allow him to spend a certain amount.
I really don't think there was an alternative for Perisic. We knew at least one alternative name for the other targets (Keane, Dier) but not for Perisic.We've spent big money in the last 3/4 years, but I feel like with the Perisic transfer, there seems to be a slight shift in our negotiation position. A few summers ago, we'd have likely paid what Inter were asking and got it done, but this summer we not only didn't get that deal done, but also haven't got any alternative options (which Mourinho must have given Woodward before the start of the window). Mourinho has commented about the 4 players he wanted many times this window and it looks like we're only getting 3.
I wonder if he would have still got the green light had we been the team looking to sign him?
You've spent more than £140M this summer alone, and that's net of sales. Over the last 4 summers(14-15-16-17) you've considerably outspent PSG...and THAT is why they could sign Neymar and you couldn'tWe haven't spent 200m in any of the summers so far.
That is also known as setting a budget, which lets face it, any well run business or sports team should do.
You've spent more than £140M this summer alone, and that's net of sales. Over the last 4 summers(14-15-16-17) you've considerably outspent PSG...and THAT is why they could sign Neymar and you couldn't
I really don't think there was an alternative for Perisic. We knew at least one alternative name for the other targets (Keane, Dier) but not for Perisic.
I don't think any club in the world can spend that much net of sales at the moment in a single summer, not with FFPThe original post was saying we had spent 200m in EACH summer since Fergie left. I was just saying we haven't spent that in ANY individual one of them. Also, of course it's net of sales. We haven't sold anyone.
I don't think any club in the world can spend that much net of sales at the moment in a single summer, not with FFP
City and PSG are doing it this year.