excuse in my opinion. The squad is good enough to finish top 4 and mourinho is the one that hasn't been good enough. He will try to deflect but our wage bill is the biggest in the world or close, he has had two windows, don't be distracted in my opinion
You may need to check & update that than throwing that tiresome cliche. We have since offload some useless big earners. We may still be among the big earner. Remember that quite some of those big earner were Mourinho's predecessors doing. Why place blame on Mourinho for the undeserved wage Moyes & LVG gave to those players? Would you be happy to move in you newly purchase house & you're forced to pay for all the unpaid of the former la lord, on top of your mortgage?
What's this top 4 argument? Would anyone exchange the EL trophy with CL qualification & spot 2 seeding for 2nd , 3rd, 4th? None of the Poch, Pep, Klopp, Wenger Mourinho were good enough for not being able to mount a title challenge, I can give you that. Not good enough as not making top 4 for only the EL trophy. Give me a break.
For the coming season, the squad needs to be strengthened by some incoming transfer & players are also expected to step up. The expectation should be a title challenging. Finishing even second the way Tottenham &a Arsenal did should be considered as disappointment.
People are against those deals because of the financial outlays expected in the context of the players' age and quality particularly on Perisic. If both come at those costs and we have to replace them in three years time with zero resale value wiuld you consider such an approach sustainable? There is a good reason why the Glazers have refused to sanction such deals even when they were happy to spend more on Martial who had just half a season of first team football behind him.
As it has been consistently reported from different sources like SAF, journalists... Glazers don't interfere in footballing side of thing. So it's all between Mourinho & Woodward to work out sanction of any deal.
Mourinho has good record of net spend. When he gets involved seems like he wants a proper deal & than crazy deal, which seems like our stance. If we're to return to the top in next 3 years. That's better than any reselling fee for Perisic. A team in good position, even outcast can gain better value. That's the big picture a big club should look at. Transfer fee may once day not increase at this crazy rate, but it likely never gets cheaper. Whether he can become a success is for debate of course.
If one half ass & without a clear plan, they may eventually end up as another Arsenal. Healthy financial & on theory can compete in transfer market, but in reality is in a weird situation where not outright selling clubs, but just a stepping stone club for young player for a phase in their career. Why? They don't go that extra mile agressively with the quick fix to aggressive challenge. They just waited for forever for some young talent to develop. Too bad some other players couldn't wait & moved on eventually with Arsenal stayed in a vicious cycle of plugging holes after holes.