Watched Hoogma quite a bit for work last season, tidy player and solid signing.
Transfer Tweets - Summer 2017 | Keep it on topic
- Thread starter Damien
- Start date
Watched Hoogma quite a bit for work last season, tidy player and solid signing.
The player that allows the attack to click and suits Cristiano Ronaldo.
You a scout?
No but my job involves watching a lot of football and Heracles was my designated team for the Eredivisie.
Ronaldo will soon be 33, is it smart to sell a 24 yo because Ronaldo's stats will slightly drop?
As good as he is, Ronaldo will soon need replacing. When he slips so will Benzema's purpose so instead of having to replace Cristiano on his own, Madrid will also have to replace Benzema as well.
Long term this is a terrible decision.
As good as he is, Ronaldo will soon need replacing. When he slips so will Benzema's purpose so instead of having to replace Cristiano on his own, Madrid will also have to replace Benzema as well.
Long term this is a terrible decision.
Do you ever watch Real Madrid?
Benzema is a vital part of their attack, and has been for a long time, pre-Zidane. The job he does is incredibly underrated.
I would take the better player: Benzema. Simply using raw numbers to prove who's better, that's idiotic.
That's like saying that selling Pique from our end was a terrible long-term decision as Vidic and Rio were getting older and we would need Pique once they need replacing. Madrid would have liked to keep Morata but seems like he is determined to play more in another team and in which case it is prudent to let him go.
Not really, first Benzema is a good goalscorer but they don't use him that way, secondly Morata is replaceable and finally Morata could stay if he wants to but he allegedly prefers to play a lot right now instead of fighting for a place and playing a lot, later.
Sorry didn't check the banned list. Deleted the post
Ronaldo is getting older though and is playing less and less which lessens the need for Benzema that little bit more. Varane faced this exact scenario with Pepe and has come out the other side.
You can't really blame Morata for wanting to play more games now. Yes he could wait, but if there is a really good player about at that time you can bet Real will be in for him. Where would that leave Morata? He might as well leave now while he still has loads of potential than be shunted aside when he could be 2-3 years older and that potential has not developed.
If I was in their place, I wouldn't want to tinker with the golden formula that has given them 3 CL titles in last 4 years. Even at the cost of letting a promising player go.
I don't blame him, I thought that he should have rejected last year offer.
He didn't really have the option if I recall correctly. Real bought him back as was their legal right, and my understanding is that he was happy to stay at Juve, who were also happy to keep him.
However, with interest from England, particularly Chelsea - Real wanted to buy him back for the pre-agreed price and then flog him to Chelsea for close to triple. I think given the chance, Morata would have stayed at Juve, but he was effectively a Real player on loan in Italy.
Zidane has just won the champions league and league double. You cant criticise his team selection at all.
And I had a problem with that theory because in the EU workers are free to chose their employer, Morata didn't had a signed contract with them since he signed one last summer.
@RobinLFC please check whether the tweets are from a legitimate account or not.
Apologies, think I'll leave the tweets to other persons from now on. Got a bit too excited
Apologies, think I'll leave the tweets to other persons from now on. Got a bit too excited
What did it say?
They'll probably sign Mbappe though - they always need the next new shiny thing
True, but Mbappe and Morata would be insane together.
Well that's similar to how he can't simply just choose United as his employer now, we need to find an agreement with Real.
The difference is that he was effectively a Real player last summer, as opposed to a Juve one. If he wanted to choose to be employed by Juve, they would have had to agree a deal with Real, which given the prices quoted, they were unwilling to do so.
Perhaps the fault on Morata's side was agreeing to that deal in 2014 or whatever it was. However, last summer Real were just exercising the agreement they previously agreed.
So how much would you take for lloris?
Forster is poor. Doesn't command his box aerially, even worse for someone who's 6ft7, slow across and off his line, distribution/kicking very ropey. He's just big.
No, Juventus had a clause that they couldn't reject and that's it. What happens next is that the player will have to have a signed contractual agreement with Real which will allow Real to register him, even if Morata had a pre-contract, he wasn't forced to sign the actual contract, it would have led to compensations either already agreed or decided by courts but he wasn't effectively a Real Madrid player, it's his own doing that made him a Real Madrid player.
Griezmann extends contract till 2022
Never heard of him
Calciomercato are rubbish to be honest. United were never linked with him by a reliable source.
Enjoy winning feck all. Would hate if we went back for him next season.
unrealExpensive loyalty.The clause is still in 100m€ so will be yours next summer
As much as possible of course - but if I had to value his actual worth I'd say around £30 million though given how mad these fees are you would be disappointed not to get £40-50 million for him and I would bite your hand off and I love Lloris.
Will be strange to be A. Madrid fans now cheering a loyal player who'll clearly be off next year.
Juve didn't have to agree anything. The buy back clause works similar to the release clause, if the player refuses the move it's irrelevant.
There's nothing clear about it just yet.
How do you know? Edit: That the clause has not changed.