It's a process.
Transfer Tweets - Manchester United - 2024/25
- Thread starter mazhar13
- Start date
The real replacement is the friends we made along the way
"With Marcus Rashford heading to Aston Villa on loan and talks for Bayern Munich’s Mathys Tel arriving on loan continuing"
The article was published after the news came out about the talks for Tel breaking down.
+ Greenwood
Wait, did we sign West Ham? When did this happen?!
Dorgu, Heaven in
They got revealed today sending ripples all around the pl, other teams are now trembling in their boots. (nah I'm jesting, not fair on the new kids but still ....it's a disgrace)
Let’s be fair. The glazers ruined us. INEOS have a right mess to clear up. They aren’t doing a great job but what they inherited is awful
Rashford's done now. Don't see the point in the amount of toxicity people have been showing towards him frankly. He performed well for us for many years. I wish him all the best at Villa and all parties can hopefully move past this.
I thought Woodward was bad but some of the deals Murthough and Arnold agreed have put us on our knees. To put things in perspective we're rushing around on the last day of the transfer window because loaning out Rashford has freed up around 3m we might be able to use to find a warm body on loan to bolster our anaemic strike force.
Awful is where we are now, 11 defeats and 29 points after 24 PL games in their first full season in charge of football matters, INEOS current incompetence is making ED Woodward reign of being no lower than 7th and domestic and European cup wins look like he was at least competent as a CEO and we all know he wasn’t!
Play the kids!!
Woodward started from a far higher place, the years and years of mismanagement has led us to here, a bunch of mismatched overpaid primadonnas that are is inconsistent as I've ever seen from any team.
It was always going to get worse before it got better, as if people are thinking it was just going to be a case of new owners = completely different performances from the same players.
Was it? Not sure why that was a given.
We seem to be the only club where its guaranteed that things have to get worse before they get better apparently. Despite the fact that if you bring in competent owners and hire a good manager, things should probably start to look at least a little bit better in the short term. Which they did in the summer where it was declared that finally we had competent people handling transfers based on the fees we paid and players we targeted. Only for there to be a 180 as soon as the team started performing badly and it to be all Ten Hag's signings.
I understand why people throw out these sayings its likely in hope that the path we are on is the right one. However, there is just as much chance that Amorim is but one of a long line of promising managers who have come to the premier league and failed. Just as Ten Hag was once a promising manager.
For the record, I don't think things should have to be this bad for it to get better. A good manager would likely have shown improvements in performances and results by now, regardless of what formation they play.
Fair points but it would be interesting to see Klopps team in his first season and whether he had a defined style of play after the same amount of games. iirc there wasn’t one.
I think it's fair to say it was obvious it would get worse if we completely change our style of play, without investing in the squad and dogmatically stick to it.
Flippantly saying a cliché as if there was no other option seems disingenuous. This is a clear decision in my opinion and I hope it is the right one, but I feel like it's doing far more damage than anything else at the moment.
We are still better off with all three of them gone and nobody replacing them.
We’re also the only team that has players that find themselves outmatched physically every single game.
We’ve had a long stretch of poor recruitment and it’ll affect every manager that takes over us until the squad’s fitness is overhauled and massively improved on.