Zed is not dead
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2023
- Messages
- 2,002
If he works hard enough, the Caf can judge him to be utter shite at 20yo and that we must absolutely sell him
doesn't need to be selling most valuable players
So can INEOS sell Nice and use it all for us then? I’m sure UEFA won’t make an example of us.Chelsea, the kings of skirting laws. Been doing it for a long time. Would love it if they had 3 year transfer ban, even if what they do is 'legal'.
doesn't need to be selling most valuable players
doesn't need to be selling most valuable players
doesn't need to be selling most valuable players
Old TraffordDo we have that sort of thing to sell then?
sums up our owners nicelyCarrington, to Ineos but I think the spit ownership is what would be holding SJR back because why would he do it for the benefit of the Glazers and other minority shareholders? This is why a partial sale was always bad for us because the new co-owners can't use any creative means to solve serious issues when the other party isn't interested in doing so.
AgreeGlad you believe that will happen, personally think we need to see some concrete links to forwards
doesn't need to be selling most valuable players
By selling rubbish we don’t need like Lindelof, Shaw, Casemiro, Rashford, that also takes a lot of wages off the books. I bet Rashford, Casemiro and Shaw are all earning close to 300k or over. We shouldn’t be selling our best prospects and our most lethal threat in attack.So how do we raise money to help PSR then?
You call them rubbish and acknowledge they're on high wages, yet expect us to sell them for for enough money that enables us to invest significantly in improving the squad?By selling rubbish we don’t need like Lindelof, Shaw, Casemiro, Rashford, that also takes a lot of wages off the books. I bet Rashford, Casemiro and Shaw are all earning close to 300k or over. We shouldn’t be selling our best prospects and our most lethal threat in attack.
There is no selling any of those players though. Best we can hope for is someone pays their wages and even that is a long shotBy selling rubbish we don’t need like Lindelof, Shaw, Casemiro, Rashford, that also takes a lot of wages off the books. I bet Rashford, Casemiro and Shaw are all earning close to 300k or over. We shouldn’t be selling our best prospects and our most lethal threat in atattack
There is no selling any of those players though. Best we can hope for is someone pays their wages and even that is a long shot
I'm finding it hard to believe,
We signed Heaven
doesn't need to be selling most valuable players
doesn't need to be selling most valuable players
We could have , but not now Jim has transferred the ownership from trawlers Inc to IneosAmazing!
Why couldn`t Manchester united then sell the naming rights of one of our stands to Ineos for £ 300m or something like that?
Amazing!
Why couldn`t Manchester united then sell the naming rights of one of our stands to Ineos for £ 300m or something like that?
Sky also reported the other day that Southampton would want £55m for him.The way media just pull numbers out of their rear ends. £55m for what?
Transfers don’t work like that unfortunatelyIf mudeyk is 100million, then Garnacho should be at least the same amount
Of course not. But the club they own seems to be sweating over PSR going forward and needs a good influx of cash. A somewhat shady stunt like that might be beneficial for the long term. A stand for 300m is obviously a stupid example, but other clubs seem to be rather creative with this kind of shit.Firstly because Ineos don't want to pay 300m for that I'd imagine.
Dibling at 18 is already a much more rounded player than Garna is at 20, it is not like for like, Dibling offers a completely different set of attributes whether he is worth £55m or not is a different question, IMO Dibling has a much higher ceiling than Garna but he could also be the next Evan Ferguson and drop off a cliffHow is that an upgrade? Just keep Garnacho and help him develop. He's still just a kid, ffs!
Only issue is he's out for around 2 weeks.Dibling at 18 is already a much more rounded player than Garna is at 20, it is not like for like, Dibling offers a completely different set of attributes whether he is worth £55m or not is a different question, IMO Dibling has a much higher ceiling than Garna but he could also be the next Evan Ferguson and drop off a cliff
doesn't need to be selling most valuable players
Lindelof has 4 months left on his contract. Nobody is buying him.By selling rubbish we don’t need like Lindelof, Shaw, Casemiro, Rashford, that also takes a lot of wages off the books. I bet Rashford, Casemiro and Shaw are all earning close to 300k or over. We shouldn’t be selling our best prospects and our most lethal threat in attack.
That's a shame.Lindelof has 4 months left on his contract. Nobody is buying him.
Sir Jim should buy it and sack the old cnut who works there who slags him off on his youtube channel constantlyWe should sell Gary's Hotel Football, while he's celebrating our goal
The club own a lot of land and homes in the area.What assets do we have to sell? We don’t have any hotels.
I'd be more worried about him getting homesick as he couldn't hack it at Chelsea, as it was too far away from home.Dibling at 18 is already a much more rounded player than Garna is at 20, it is not like for like, Dibling offers a completely different set of attributes whether he is worth £55m or not is a different question, IMO Dibling has a much higher ceiling than Garna but he could also be the next Evan Ferguson and drop off a cliff
Land that may be needed for expansion?The club own a lot of land and homes in the area.
Over 100 acres apparently, so that's over 100 football fields approx, so pretty big stadium if so.Land that may be needed for expansion?