Transfer Tweets - Manchester United - 2024/25


Selling Garnacho for £55m to then spend all that £55m on Dibling would be so us. No doubt there'd still be people trying to justify needing to sell a more talented young player to transform our team with a less talented young player that basically plays the same position that apparently doesn't suit Amorim's team.

I see there's already a comment claiming Dibling is better than Garnacho. Predictable.
 
Selling Garnacho for £55m to then spend all that £55m on Dibling would be so us. No doubt there'd still be people trying to justify needing to sell a more talented young player to transform our team with a less talented young player that basically plays the same position that apparently doesn't suit Amorim's team.

I see there's already a comment claiming Dibling is better than Garnacho. Predictable.

That's not exactly what's happening though is it. I think selling Garnacho for £55m would allow us to spend something closer to £150m with how the payments would be structured.

Honestly, I think Garnacho's development could go either way. We've been crying for years that we hold onto player for too long. If the footballing people honestly think that Garnacho is at the peak of his value, it it's a great time to sell. Got to trust them on this one, even if I don't like it.

We tend to keep academy players too long, hoping they'll reach their potential whilst their value plummets.
 
Selling Garnacho for £55m to then spend all that £55m on Dibling would be so us. No doubt there'd still be people trying to justify needing to sell a more talented young player to transform our team with a less talented young player that basically plays the same position that apparently doesn't suit Amorim's team.

I see there's already a comment claiming Dibling is better than Garnacho. Predictable.
The point would be that in theory £55m for Garna (+ around £1m wage for the remainder of the season) would be worth £275m amortized, if you factor in wages it still gives us a budget to but Dibling + 2 more players this January and still have wiggle room with PSR ready for the summer
 
Is that his weird way of saying we have bid €35m? It reads like a question on a kid’s exam.
Having to rephrase the sake bit of news a hundred times each for engagement farming probably leads to mental degeneration.
 
The point would be that in theory £55m for Garna (+ around £1m wage for the remainder of the season) would be worth £275m amortized, if you factor in wages it still gives us a budget to but Dibling + 2 more players this January and still have wiggle room with PSR ready for the summer

It’s mad how people still aren’t realising this.

The only thing that would prevent it is we don’t have the money regardless of PSR, or if we have left it too late to get our targets.
 
Or the fact we'd be even more broke next year that way

We're going to have to make the signings at some point though. Our cash constraints don't disappear so we have to spend within our means but if we're not waiting just because of PSR then all the better.
 
Of course not. But the club they own seems to be sweating over PSR going forward and needs a good influx of cash. A somewhat shady stunt like that might be beneficial for the long term. A stand for 300m is obviously a stupid example, but other clubs seem to be rather creative with this kind of shit.
They don't own the club outright though. They're minority shareholders. Which means any move like that would effectively be giving the other shareholders a free ride.
 
They don't own the club outright though. They're minority shareholders. Which means any move like that would effectively be giving the other shareholders a free ride.
The only hope is that PSR gets so bad that the Glazers are forced to sell more if not all of the club to SJR and then he can do something about the debt
 
Bad for who, Glazers?




Sorry I cannot read Goldbridge he makes my soul hurt....

but yeah there is only so much give, increasing ticket prices will not make an impact if we do not return to the top end of the table sooner rather than later, and without significant investment which means more debt we do not have the squad to do that any time soon
 
Jacobs, Romano etc reported that the first bid was 27m.
There were definitely tweets saying we’d had a 30 mil bid rejected. Now we’re getting the most reliable United journalists saying we are bidding 30. I know who I’d believe.

Whitwell, mitten and ornestein (I know he isn’t specifically a United journo) are the three that get pretty much everything right.
 
Sorry I cannot read Goldbridge he makes my soul hurt....

but yeah there is only so much give, increasing ticket prices will not make an impact if we do not return to the top end of the table sooner rather than later, and without significant investment which means more debt we do not have the squad to do that any time soon
Something will have to give soon, the Glazers will realise they’ve milked the club enough, there will be another sale if the club soon, whether 100% to SJR or a sale to a third party. The club can’t go on like this.
 
The interest payments shouldn’t count towards PSR - the PL made leveraged buyouts illegal, so Utd should not be the only club penalised for the door being closed too late
 
Bad for who, Glazers?




Brent is a bell and wish he'd crawl off, as he's not a United fan, just a leech that's latched onto a money maker, much like the people who created the debt.
INEOS haven't lumbered the club with debt, there's no obvious way around it, other than a full takeover and the new owner paying off the debt. Other than that it's not solvable for a very long time. But INEO are getting criticised for having to navigate around this this reality. Would have been so simple for the leeches to use the funds of the shares sold to INEOS to pay off the debt.
 
Bad for who, Glazers?




This tweet is just stupid. Anyone who thinks "finance costs" on the P&L statement equals interest expeses has no business commenting on anything about financials.

These are our real interest expenses from the last 3 years.
dDvrSy0.png


It's still very bad but nowhere near as bad as that tweet makes it out to be
 
The only hope is that PSR gets so bad that the Glazers are forced to sell more if not all of the club to SJR and then he can do something about the debt

Do you believe he wants to actually clear debt, personally have got my doubts on that