Am not sure he is the profile we need, could do with a bigger stronger striker, Vlahovic is smaller than Hoijlund and does not seem to have much of a physical presence or lightning speed, all of which would be ok if he was a Messi level player but he is not that
Transfer Tweets - Manchester United - 2024/25
- Thread starter mazhar13
- Start date
Click bait story
Our ability to rebuild the squad with players suited for Amorim’s system is severely hampered by our finances and PSR. Garnacho does not seem particularly well suited to that system, and has been very inconsistent with his decision making and end product (and, apparently, attitude). He’s one of the only players who we should be able to get a decent amount of money for, and because he counts as a home grown player, selling him provides an even bigger boost to our finances. It’s precisely because we have so many areas that need fixing that it might make sense to sell someone who isn’t starting but whose sale can boost our finances and therefore spending power so significantly.
Last edited:
That's what I'm thinking as well. No one in Italy's reported on this yet. They're more focused on the feasibility of Zirkzee's departure from United.
Click bait account, really.
Player swap stories are more than 99 times out of a 100. I stop reading when I realise it's a swap. They shouldn't be posted really.
I'll take him. Very versatile and mobile. He's just always struck me as a PL-type player. He has the physical qualities to succeed in England I think.
When I assumed we'd have Zirkzee for at least the rest of the season, I thought this made little to no sense.
But now, I like this. He's very capable, can play up top or wide off the #9, and is likely better than anyone else we could get in Jan
Reliable sauce
Our answer to Isak?
1. That goes for any player we buy, no?
2. Gyokeres as far as I am aware scored against championship teams (no amazing stats), Portuguese teams and a handful of clubs in CL. When did he play loads against PL team opponents?
Hojlund is tall and strong but when he’s not busy tripping and falling, he’s busy ducking away from any head-height crosses. Doesn’t say everything ..
As a loan signing I'm okay with it (to replace Zirkzee) but I don't think he's very good. Not convinced he's any better than Hoijund.
This seams more likely and from a sold source too.
Not excited for this one bit, flash in the pan player who’s done nothing outside of that one season for Frankfurt.
I would prefer Vlahovic to Kolo Muani by a distance.
Vlahovic would be an improvement on what we have but that's not saying much.
We should be going for Gyokores/Isak/Oshimen not players deemed not good enough by Juve.
We should be going for Gyokores/Isak/Oshimen not players deemed not good enough by Juve.
Would be a poor response imo.Isak would not be getting loaned out by PSG.
More Alexander Isuk than Alexander Isak?
That would require Milan paying a fee we'd be happy to sell him for.
I'm guessing the club are hoping he shines on loan and can then be sold for much more come the summer than a toxic asset right now.
Tier 2:
1. If we get gyokeres and it doesn’t work out he will retain value (scored 60 goals or something stupid?)
2. Scored a hat trick against city most recently. Again 60 goals is a ridiculous stat.
I get the reservation about the quality of the Portuguese league if he’d scored 20 goals, but he is breaking records and scoring hat tricks in the champions league. Ask yourself how many goals would he have to score for your reservations to be assuaged?
Loan with option to buy would be good Business
Tier 2:
This can't be real, surely they won't pay us good money for him
Getting his wages off the book and covering amortised cost us good enough for me
30 million for Casemiro would be great. Sell him and a few others and buy Ederson, Dorgu and a striker.
We aren’t getting €30m for Casemiro, let’s be real here. We’d be happy to get rid for free to offload his wages. United can’t do those types of deals.
Casemiro out Ederson in?
Huge upgrade and with the wages saved we could, pay a lot of the transfer fee off upfront, saving on future payments.
As we’re short in CM and if we lose one we need to replace, which is a shame as we are crying out for a LWB.
Huge upgrade and with the wages saved we could, pay a lot of the transfer fee off upfront, saving on future payments.
As we’re short in CM and if we lose one we need to replace, which is a shame as we are crying out for a LWB.
Depends on what contract we give the player. Juve want rid of Vlahovic because he's not worth close to what they're paying for him, and if he's not good for this Juve team in Serie A he's certainly not good enough for the premier league and to get us competing with Liverpool/City.
Gyokeres scored a hatrick vs City but then got bullied vs Arsenal. If there wasn't much difference in the price then we should try and sign Isak all day given his premier league performances.
That could happen - because wages aren't a big issue in the middle-east. The majority of the european stars make more then Casemiro