BeforeKeanetherewasRobson
Full Member
Don't think they flagged as an error, but one they think he missed.Was that a “clear and obvious” error? No. VAR farce.
Don't think they flagged as an error, but one they think he missed.Was that a “clear and obvious” error? No. VAR farce.
The position of the hand isn't in an abnormal position because he's jumping for a header. Ball clearly hits him accidentally because the French player misses the header. France aren't being denied anything by the ball hitting his hand, the next 3 players behind Perisic are all Croatians no French player close.Why?
Please let this be the end of VAR. Ridiculous decision.
the little movement between the hand and knee for me shiws he tried to disguise it aftrr it happened. it hits his hand as he moves it towards the ball and realises then moves his knee towards his hand to try and disguise it. i may be wrong but thats my interpretation from what ive seen so far.
Yeah let's get rid of it cause it made the right decision
How many handballs have been given a pen when it wasn't deliberate ? Loads of them.
The handball rule was always flawed. This isn't exception.
How can you prove whether or not there was any intention? They are all good actors. He could have moved his arm out of the way. No problem
Indeed, you have been misinterpreting it, it seems. The fact that 5 refs in the studio thought that it might have been a pen, and then one of the best refs in the world (I guess, otherwise he wouldn't refereeing this) thought that it was a penalty after watching it like 10 times, makes it pretty clear in my opinion. You cannot move the hand in the direction of the ball while it is not attached to the body.He was jumping, it looked like entirely natural movement to me and there was never any intention to handle the ball.
Handball is the most misinterpreted rule in football.
Maybe not, we'll never really know. They did manage to beat what was put in front of them however.
It's a penalty. Got the right decision in the end so who cares.
Indeed, you have been misinterpreting it, it seems. The fact that 5 refs in the studio thought that it might have been a pen, and then one of the best refs in the world (I guess, otherwise he wouldn't refereeing this) thought that it was a penalty after watching it like 10 times, makes it pretty clear in my opinion. You cannot move the hand in the direction of the ball while it is not attached to the body.
It did though.It didn't though
He sees the ball at the last second and swats it away.You honestly believe his instincts and reactions are so good that he can guess when someone will miss a header and adjust his arm accordingly
But has the L and calling the other team "loser" is okay?Why not? Take the L.
It's a penalty. Got the right decision in the end so who cares.
Don’t be preposterous. The linesman was giving a goal kick before VAR intervened, ffs!
Ridiculous Why the feck not ? Because of Vida?I don't think Russia wants Croatia to win on Russian soil.
Hoddle doesn't believe in the letter Z.Correct me if I’m being stupid and pronouncing it wrong myself but is anyone else getting annoyed with Hoddle missing out the Z in Mandzukic?!
This situation is really badly defined by the rules. The fiftiest of fifty-fifty decisions. Highly unsatisfactory to have it play such a crucial role in a WC final.VAR gave the ref the possibility to judge it right, he didn't.
Not VAR's fault the ref is an idiot.
That is subject to referee's opinion, which usually is based if the hand is on natural position (it wasn't), if it is moving in the direction of the ball (it was) and if it is touching the body (it wasn't).The position of the hand isn't in an abnormal position because he's jumping for a header. Ball clearly hits him accidentally because the French player misses the header. France aren't being denied anything by the ball hitting his hand, the next 3 players behind Perisic are all Croatians no French player close.
Most of all it's just not a handball because it isn't intentional. Rules state that the handball has to be intentional.
Indeed, you have been misinterpreting it, it seems. The fact that 5 refs in the studio thought that it might have been a pen, and then one of the best refs in the world (I guess, otherwise he wouldn't refereeing this) thought that it was a penalty after watching it like 10 times, makes it pretty clear in my opinion. You cannot move the hand in the direction of the ball while it is not attached to the body.
Yep. He lowers his hand into the ball once the French player missed it.He sees the ball at the last second and swats it away.
If he didn't follow through like a vollyball player and it bounced off him instead I could see it being unintentional.
IMO he instinctively moves his arm towards it as a sort of last second panic manoeuvre
Whoa now, you’re assuming experts know what they’re doing!Indeed, you have been misinterpreting it, it seems. The fact that 5 refs in the studio thought that it might have been a pen, and then one of the best refs in the world (I guess, otherwise he wouldn't refereeing this) thought that it was a penalty after watching it like 10 times, makes it pretty clear in my opinion. You cannot move the hand in the direction of the ball while it is not attached to the body.
That was a reffing error, not a VAR error.It didn't. No intention there, his hand went down to lift his thigh to block the ball. It's a natural movement.
Based on what ? Surely not on what the game has been so far.France would be more deserving winners