Member 5225
Guest
errr they gonna lift the trophy then?
Ssssshhhhhh, just say he's shit like everyone else, show that you belong with the cool kids.Giroud did briliant defensively work in his game, but people only count goals for a centre forward.
Yep, besides Croatia should have had a penalty as well when Umtiti was holding Mandzukic. Daylight robbery, France was obviously the sponsor's choice.Is anyone here seriously denying it was a handball by Perisic?
wtf are we waiting for
If thongs don't go wrong (they usually do) France will be even more frightening in the future. The likes of Mbappe, Pogba, Umtiti, Varane will be even better, the likes of Dembele, Coman, Martial might go up a level or two, heck even Griezmann will be just 31. Essentially, all the important players will be there.France needs to play better in 22, Brazil will be stronger and I know the caftards keep blasting England but they played really good against Belgium and if Kane and Dier scored the outcome could had be different and I didn't see much from Belgium besides Hazard, Kevin and Courtois, I think they will be in the group of favorites to win.
The replay from behind makes it pretty clear that it was a foul.
They do and in 2014 when Germany gave 4 to Portugal I had to leave the cafe' because they didn't stop making fun of us - except a few Brazilian friends. But this WC after Portugal I wanted Brazil to win and I think the game against Belgium was an off game because they are better than Belgium and probably France.For why reason? Portugal wasn't even in that WC and they were actually a likeable team. Figo, Rui Costa, Oceano, Couto... good team and got even greater in EURO 2000. I remember I liked to watch that team playing.
Hillary Clinton.Who's that Blonde chick? Presidents wife?
Don't cry too much.Luka Modric best player.... nope.
Good decision. Modric player of the tournament.
She looks a younger version of his wifeLooks like the French president has managed to get himself a girlfriend as well
Ill look again, but thought Griezmann dove before contact was made. On the VAR isnt that the rule? I agree with you, all it is is a tool to give a clear view for refs to see what they missed. Think the rule is that if its a 50/50 call like that pen then they shouldnt intervene. Think it was a pen too, but it is very marginal anyway.The replay from behind makes it pretty clear that it was a foul.
Why though? For big decisions it is the best thing to give all the tools to the ref to make the right decision. If he still fecks it up (I think that he made the correct decision today), then he is to be blamed.
Don't cry too much.
Luka Modric best player.... nope.
Aren't they selected based on their performances throughout the tournament? So basically for being the best refs, I guess.I will never understand why refs get medals for reffing a final.