The vaccines | vaxxed boosted unvaxxed? New poll

How's your immunity looking? Had covid - vote twice - vax status and then again for infection status

  • Vaxxed but no booster

  • Boostered

  • Still waiting in queue for first vaccine dose

  • Won't get vaxxed (unless I have to for travel/work etc)

  • Past infection with covid + I've been vaccinated

  • Past infection with covid - I've not been vaccinated


Results are only viewable after voting.

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,558
There isn't enough of Pfizer/Moderna still in EU unless uptake is bad. Pfizer will have lower deliveries in July.
We got/are getting roughly 37 million Pfizer and Moderna doses in Q2 and are expecting 45 million in Q3. Moderna will deliver 3x the number they did in Q2.

The numbers per capita should be roughly the same across all of Europe.
 

massi83

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
2,866
We got/are getting roughly 37 million Pfizer and Moderna doses in Q2 and are expecting 45 million in Q3. Moderna will deliver 3x the number they did in Q2.

The numbers per capita should be roughly the same across all of Europe.
Pfizer told yesterday that numbers in July will be around 40% lower than in June. You probably will have enough in September but not really sooner. Good news on Moderna, that I wasn't aware of, but it doesn't compensate for Pfizer in July.
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,588
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
The key question for me is whether the protection against hospitalisation is similar after one dose against delta than it is against alpha. If it is with 80% of over 18s vaccinated that’s a good level of protection in the community. I haven’t seen anything on that yet though.
Yep, you're right and that's difficult at there moment, as you're basically looking at hospitalisation running 10-14 days behind cases. It looks like it will be good news on that so far - based on some modelling of the age group normally hospitalised by covid v who is currently being hospitalised.


You need to do some maths based on historic deaths/hospitalisations (v age/clinical risk) to know why that's good news for vaccines.
 

Pogue Mahone

Swiftie Fan Club President
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
135,048
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Pfizer told yesterday that numbers in July will be around 40% lower than in June. You probably will have enough in September but not really sooner. Good news on Moderna, that I wasn't aware of, but it doesn't compensate for Pfizer in July.
Curevac was supposed to be coming online in June but that’s been pushed out. Which makes the Pfizer decrease more of a problem.
 

decorativeed

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
12,704
Location
Tameside
Just had my first jab. A bit late, as I was first contacted to book in 30th April, but a hefty work schedule and terrible phobia of hospital environments and needles meant I didn't go straight away.

Got the Pfizer one in a tent pitched in my local market place. Couldn't have gone any smoother, and feeling really relieved now I've got the first one out of the way.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,558
Pfizer told yesterday that numbers in July will be around 40% lower than in June. You probably will have enough in September but not really sooner. Good news on Moderna, that I wasn't aware of, but it doesn't compensate for Pfizer in July.
Do you have a source for that? I see Norway has a couple of articles on a 33% reduction for them, but no other news and nothing from the government here in Italy.

If those reductions are across Europe, Italy will lose approx 3 million Pfizer doses in July but gain 3 million Moderna. So net no major difference.
 

massi83

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
2,866
Do you have a source for that? I see Norway has a couple of articles on a 33% reduction for them, but no other news and nothing from the government here in Italy.

If those reductions are across Europe, Italy will lose approx 3 million Pfizer doses in July but gain 3 million Moderna. So net no major difference.
Finnish authority got confirmation from Pfizer as well as Norway. No other sources unfortunately, but highly reliable. I would say it is a little bit bigger reduction than that (more than 100k per week in Finland, so should be over million per week in Italy), and depends how the increase in Moderna is divided. I would guess it isn't 3x in July, but less than that, and then more in September (but only a guess).
 

Dante

Average bang
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
25,280
Location
My wit's end
When I was getting my first AZ vaccine, the nurse told me I'd have to wait 12 weeks for the NHS to text me about a second dose. But I couldn't be arsed waiting that long, so I thought I'd take a look to see what I could wrangle on the booking website. Thankfully, I've managed to manually get myself an appointment using only my NHS number.

The confirmation message seems to be fully aware that it's my second jab, so everything looks above board. The website also appeared to filter dates exclusively starting from 8 weeks after my first, so the timings appear to be getting tracked safely.

I'm happy with all of that. I've just saved myself 4 weeks of waiting. I think it's because I voluntarily chose AZ despite being under 40. It means I've somehow been included in one of the priority cohorts as a result.
 

Dan_F

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
10,709
I thought mine was tomorrow morning, but turns out it is halfway through the England game. No wonder there was a free slot :rolleyes:
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,588
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
Vaccines v Delta, current best guess fits on effectiveness. No split between AZ and Prizer in these figures as it's not available inside in the current published dataset, and in any case it's the overall effect of Delta that we're looking at.

Broadly, against any symptomatic disease from Delta 35% after one dose, 80% after two. Against hospitalisation and death, around 80% after one dose, better than 95% after two doses.

This thread describes some of the stats, the model assumptions (like Delta hospitalisations, without any vaccines would have followed roughly the same age profile as they did for the alpha variant) and limitations of the estimate.

 

Pogue Mahone

Swiftie Fan Club President
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
135,048
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Vaccines v Delta, current best guess fits on effectiveness. No split between AZ and Prizer in these figures as it's not available inside in the current published dataset, and in any case it's the overall effect of Delta that we're looking at.

Broadly, against any symptomatic disease from Delta 35% after one dose, 80% after two. Against hospitalisation and death, around 80% after one dose, better than 95% after two doses.

This thread describes some of the stats, the model assumptions (like Delta hospitalisations, without any vaccines would have followed roughly the same age profile as they did for the alpha variant) and limitations of the estimate.

I’ve had a rant before about the assumptions made when calculating effectiveness this way so might as well make the same point again. It’s a VERY crude estimation which is significantly flawed. It only holds up assuming the vaccinated and unvaccinated are equally matched cohorts with identical exposure to the virus (obviously not the case).

One very obvious cause of bias in that the vaccinated/fully vaccinated are more likely to be older, less socially active, more likely to WFH or be retired etc etc so will seem to be protected by the vaccine when actually they’re mainly protected by their behaviours. Conversely, the number of cases in the un-vaccinated cohort will be inflated by students and young employees working in e.g. meat packing plants (i.e. two of the most frequent locations of major outbreaks)

One of my bug bears about “covid twitter” are people looking to mathematicians for answers that should come from clinicians that have a much better understandIng of concepts like bias and causality.

To be fair, the trends are encouraging but I wouldn’t be taking the exact %’s mentioned seriously at all.

EDIT: Reading the whole thread he does seem to attempt to take the exposure bias into account but doesn’t show his workings so impossible to know if his approach holds up.
 
Last edited:

fergieisold

New Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
7,122
Location
Saddleworth (home) Manchester (work)
Pfizer told yesterday that numbers in July will be around 40% lower than in June. You probably will have enough in September but not really sooner. Good news on Moderna, that I wasn't aware of, but it doesn't compensate for Pfizer in July.
bit of a bummer. I’m gonna push to get my second Pfizer 4 weeks after the first so I have a chance of going on holiday.

had my first yesterday, people just turning up for seconds as they had spare.
 

fergieisold

New Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
7,122
Location
Saddleworth (home) Manchester (work)
When I was getting my first AZ vaccine, the nurse told me I'd have to wait 12 weeks for the NHS to text me about a second dose. But I couldn't be arsed waiting that long, so I thought I'd take a look to see what I could wrangle on the booking website. Thankfully, I've managed to manually get myself an appointment using only my NHS number.

The confirmation message seems to be fully aware that it's my second jab, so everything looks above board. The website also appeared to filter dates exclusively starting from 8 weeks after my first, so the timings appear to be getting tracked safely.

I'm happy with all of that. I've just saved myself 4 weeks of waiting. I think it's because I voluntarily chose AZ despite being under 40. It means I've somehow been included in one of the priority cohorts as a result.
I had my first yesterday and because there’s spares they pretty much said after 4 weeks just try turning up for a second.
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,588
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
On vaccine take-up and ethnicity, the UK continues to have a worrying imbalance. What the opinion surveys and local health authorities have warned about continues to be visible in the actual vaccination stats.


That's an overall over 50 stat so it probably overstates the case, as part of the difference may simply be that the age profile of the various ethnic groups is different. However, overall take-up even amongst the 50-54 group is around 85% (first dose) and 63% (both doses) so that doesn't really change the fundamental story.

Numbers come from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/national-flu-and-covid-19-surveillance-reports
 

fergieisold

New Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
7,122
Location
Saddleworth (home) Manchester (work)
On vaccine take-up and ethnicity, the UK continues to have a worrying imbalance. What the opinion surveys and local health authorities have warned about continues to be visible in the actual vaccination stats.


That's an overall over 50 stat so it probably overstates the case, as part of the difference may simply be that the age profile of the various ethnic groups is different. However, overall take-up even amongst the 50-54 group is around 85% (first dose) and 63% (both doses) so that doesn't really change the fundamental story.

Numbers come from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/national-flu-and-covid-19-surveillance-reports
Does anyone know why the uptake is lower in some groups? Are there different reasons depending on race, culture and religion? In the white group any non uptake seems to be down to ‘free thinkers’ on Facebook that believe all the usual conspiracy theories.
 

africanspur

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
9,393
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
Does anyone know why the uptake is lower in some groups? Are there different reasons depending on race, culture and religion? In the white group any non uptake seems to be down to ‘free thinkers’ on Facebook that believe all the usual conspiracy theories.
There will be a huge variety of reasons, which also vary within ethnic groups (reasons for lower Afro-Caribbean uptake will be necessarily be the same as lower Pakistani uptake) but I think tends to revolve roughly around difficulty reaching some communities, especially in lower SE class groups, a general distrust of authority, stupid conspiracy theories circulating around local groups, language barriers and perhaps difficulty getting to vaccination centres if you're always working/ have childcare commitments etc?
 

fergieisold

New Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
7,122
Location
Saddleworth (home) Manchester (work)
There will be a huge variety of reasons, which also vary within ethnic groups (reasons for lower Afro-Caribbean uptake will be necessarily be the same as lower Pakistani uptake) but I think tends to revolve roughly around difficulty reaching some communities, especially in lower SE class groups, a general distrust of authority, stupid conspiracy theories circulating around local groups, language barriers and perhaps difficulty getting to vaccination centres if you're always working/ have childcare commitments etc?
Seems like you could solve some of the access issues by making it as easy as possible to get a vaccine but the distrust one I’m not sure how you go about changing that. And the conspiracy theory people are almost beyond help!

I had an old school friend on Facebook posting anti vax stuff with a chorus of friends backing him up. The problem was they were all posting complete misinformation - I tried providing factual information to debunk what they were saying but those types of people just seem completely brain washed!
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,588
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
I’ve had a rant before about the assumptions made when calculating effectiveness this way so might as well make the same point again. It’s a VERY crude estimation which is significantly flawed. It only holds up assuming the vaccinated and unvaccinated are equally matched cohorts with identical exposure to the virus (obviously not the case).

One very obvious cause of bias in that the vaccinated/fully vaccinated are more likely to be older, less socially active, more likely to WFH or be retired etc etc so will seem to be protected by the vaccine when actually they’re mainly protected by their behaviours. Conversely, the number of cases in the un-vaccinated cohort will be inflated by students and young employees working in e.g. meat packing plants (i.e. two of the most frequent locations of major outbreaks)

One of my bug bears about “covid twitter” are people looking to mathematicians for answers that should come from clinicians that have a much better understandIng of concepts like bias and causality.

To be fair, the trends are encouraging but I wouldn’t be taking the exact %’s mentioned seriously at all.

EDIT: Reading the whole thread he does seem to attempt to take the exposure bias into account but doesn’t show his workings so impossible to know if his approach holds up.
It's flawed, but historically he's also been consistent with the overall stats that the PHE and PH Scotland produce for efficacy (they use more granular data and then create a kind of matching unvaccinated group as a control - except in the oldest cohorts where take-up is so high they can't match people now, there they use historic ratios).

But the hospital stats are interesting because age has been such a massive determinant in hospitalisation whereas they're only a partial one in case numbers. For expected case numbers this twitterer broadly uses Autumn Alpha stats to get ratios (though he says even if he changes those by 50% it scarcely moves the dial by more than 1%)

With the national stats, increasingly Wales are part of the story as well, because the age/dose/deprivation profiles of the vaccinated are different there. It's the epidemiological equivalent of a clinical trial but only the health service are allowed to see the potentially anonymity breaking details while the hospitalisation numbers are so low.

As you say, socialising/work/education patterns are massively different and therefore so are risks. We now have the effect of the most sociable (who are also probably going in to work/education) mostly uncaccinated populations mixing more or less freely again.

Meanwhile the vaccinated older ones will generally socialise with people in their own (probably also vaccinated) age group. Obviously families - particularly families who live in the same household - change the dynamic again, which is why the local demographics come into play so strongly when you try to look at Bolton say. Canary in the mine moment.
 

esmufc07

Brad
Scout
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
49,949
Location
Lake Jonathan Creek
I had my Pfizer jab on the 17th May but received a text today saying it’s time to book my second - is this right? I thought it was around 8 weeks between jabs.
 

Paul the Wolf

Score Predictions Competition Organiser
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
18,268
Location
France - can't win anything with Swedish turnips
I had my Pfizer jab on the 17th May but received a text today saying it’s time to book my second - is this right? I thought it was around 8 weeks between jabs.
It was 4 weeks originally then extended to 6 weeks so more people got more first jabs in France.
Weird in the UK you don't get your appointments for the 1st and 2nd jabs when you book the first.
Mine were 6 weeks apart.
 

0le

Full Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2017
Messages
5,806
Location
UK
I had my Pfizer jab on the 17th May but received a text today saying it’s time to book my second - is this right? I thought it was around 8 weeks between jabs.
I think I read somewhere that they are accelerating the number of people who get their second does, but unfortunately I cannot fine the source for it.

It was 4 weeks originally then extended to 6 weeks so more people got more first jabs in France.
Weird in the UK you don't get your appointments for the 1st and 2nd jabs when you book the first.
Mine were 6 weeks apart.
You are given the option to book both appointments at the same time or to book just the first appointment.
 

Santos J

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2013
Messages
7,424
It was 4 weeks originally then extended to 6 weeks so more people got more first jabs in France.
Weird in the UK you don't get your appointments for the 1st and 2nd jabs when you book the first.
Mine were 6 weeks apart.
You do, I had my first on Friday & I couldn't book without booking the 2nd but that's not until 30th August.
 

esmufc07

Brad
Scout
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
49,949
Location
Lake Jonathan Creek
You do, I had my first on Friday & I couldn't book without booking the 2nd but that's not until 30th August.
I thought that’s how it worked but only got invited to book my first last month. Received a text today to say it’s time to book my second but when I click the link it says the vaccines should be 12 weeks apart.

I’ll just give them a call later.
 

Santos J

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2013
Messages
7,424
I thought that’s how it worked but only got invited to book my first last month. Received a text today to say it’s time to book my second but when I click the link it says the vaccines should be 12 weeks apart.

I’ll just give them a call later.
Ah that's weird, wouldn't even let me book my first without booking the 2nd at the same time. Yeah seems it still is at the minute, wonder if that'll change later though as BoJo is 'likely to announce a drive to accelerate the vaccination programme.'
 

Forevergiggs1

Full Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2019
Messages
3,462
Location
Barcelona
Supports
United
I had my Pfizer jab on the 17th May but received a text today saying it’s time to book my second - is this right? I thought it was around 8 weeks between jabs.
In Spain it's 3 weeks between jabs. Whether or not in the UK it's longer because they want as many people as possible with at least the first dose meaning a longer period between first and second I just don't know.

Just reading up on it and according to the UK it's more effective with a longer waiting period between dosis. Rules keep changing which I suppose is normal with something still relatively new.
 
Last edited:

Brwned

Have you ever been in love before?
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
50,879
I had my Pfizer jab on the 17th May but received a text today saying it’s time to book my second - is this right? I thought it was around 8 weeks between jabs.
For AZ it was recommended for 8-12 weeks because that’s what most of the trial data was based on. For Pfizer and Moderna the trials were done with doses exclusively 3 weeks apart, and most countries followed that dosing timing quite closely, but the MHRA approved it for slightly longer based on some extrapolations and to align with the general vaccination strategy (maximise first dose coverage for gen pop). 3-6 weeks is the norm for those two I think.
 

Mihai

Full Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2013
Messages
4,631
I thought that’s how it worked but only got invited to book my first last month. Received a text today to say it’s time to book my second but when I click the link it says the vaccines should be 12 weeks apart.

I’ll just give them a call later.
I received a text inviting me to book the first dose. I already had it last month.
 

Balljy

Full Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2016
Messages
3,448
Ah that's weird, wouldn't even let me book my first without booking the 2nd at the same time. Yeah seems it still is at the minute, wonder if that'll change later though as BoJo is 'likely to announce a drive to accelerate the vaccination programme.'
It could be related to where the text comes from. I got a text for the first with a link to book a date and was told that they couldn't book the second so would have to wait for a second text (which I got a couple of weeks ago). Mine came through the company behind my GP rather than the NHS itself which may explain the difference. The jab was in one of the local surgeries.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,558
In Spain it's 3 weeks between jabs. Whether or not in the UK it's longer because they want as many people as possible with at least the first dose meaning a longer period between first and second I just don't know.

Just reading up on it and according to the UK it's more effective with a longer waiting period between dosis. Rules keep changing which I suppose is normal with something still relatively new.
Pfizer and Moderna disagreed with the UK approach, it was always supposed to be a month between doses. It was a risk the government took to get as many people with the first dose as possible, hoping some protection would be better than none. That did work but the new variants are causing problems and the second doses now need to be sped up as lots of people are walking around with just 1 in them.
 

0le

Full Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2017
Messages
5,806
Location
UK
Pfizer and Moderna disagreed with the UK approach, it was always supposed to be a month between doses. It was a risk the government took to get as many people with the first dose as possible, hoping some protection would be better than none. That did work but the new variants are causing problems and the second doses now need to be sped up as lots of people are walking around with just 1 in them.
Damn. :(
 

Forevergiggs1

Full Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2019
Messages
3,462
Location
Barcelona
Supports
United
Pfizer and Moderna disagreed with the UK approach, it was always supposed to be a month between doses. It was a risk the government took to get as many people with the first dose as possible, hoping some protection would be better than none. That did work but the new variants are causing problems and the second doses now need to be sped up as lots of people are walking around with just 1 in them.
Thanks for the update. Haven't been following this thread as much as I should. Hard to know if the UK government have been extremely unlucky with the new variants or been completely irresponsible taking shortcuts. Probably somewhere in the middle.
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,588
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
Boris doing his press conference:
23/24 year olds in England can make bookings using the national system from tomorrow.

Expecting to be able to first dose vaccinate all over 18s by July 19th.

No further big rule changes in June now - or as the press describe it, June 21st has been postponed.
 
Last edited: