- Joined
- Oct 22, 2010
- Messages
- 23,204
No, I get that.. It was just a reaction to the GOP line spiking already when Teflon Don doesn’t take office for another 3 months
the blue line is going down too! it's pretty great
No, I get that.. It was just a reaction to the GOP line spiking already when Teflon Don doesn’t take office for another 3 months
My brother actually just sent me a FB post someone made today talking about “woke up today to lower interest rates and grocery prices!” like it miraculously already changed and so I sent him that tweetthe blue line is going down too! it's pretty great
Very interesting to see what happens in Ukraine.
Funding for Ukraine is essentially a big old socialist jobs program. What will the military industrial complex's lobbyist do and say when all of a sudden all that Ukraine money starts to dry up? I believe the US have sent over $65bil so far.
My brother actually just sent me a FB post someone made today talking about “woke up today to lower interest rates and grocery prices!” like it miraculously already changed and so I sent him that tweet
No, the media started retreating before he won, symbolised by "Democracy Dies In Darkness" Bezos Post.
No, its a handout, according to the general public in the US, same with the public in Europe, tried explaining to people i know what you are saying, but they are all-in on misinformation, impossible to change their minds.
Nobody gives a shit about Ukraine lets be real, outside of those who could be directly impacted, mainly Baltic states, Moldova and Poland, though Poland at least have a strong defense these days, so wouldn't worry much about them.
Even if that’s true, simply quoting an article that’s solely based on the perspective of a
My brother actually just sent me a FB post someone made today talking about “woke up today to lower interest rates and grocery prices!” like it miraculously already changed and so I sent him that tweet
That is what the people think, sure. But the US Senators and Congressmen who have their pockets lined by Military lobbyists will want that funding for Ukraine to continue.
If Ukraine were figting lets say Turkey, the funding would continue. The only issue is Trump's relationship with Trump - im convinced Putin still has a hold over him in some way! They will have kompromat that Trump would hate to see out there.
My brother actually just sent me a FB post someone made today talking about “woke up today to lower interest rates and grocery prices!” like it miraculously already changed and so I sent him that tweet
Could the data be manipulated by bots or something? Can understand why they've flipped sentiment. Or wishful thinking? Maybe a bit of new found loyalty to the leader?the blue line is going down too! it's pretty great
Which is why the energy on the Dems side at the moment is very much washing their hands out of this. The Republicans will take the House with an extremely slim majority, so Dems will close rank and force them to vote in unison for every single piece of legislation they want passed, and if they cant muster up the votes for it, too bad.They'll just blame the Dems.
They'll just blame the Dems.
Which is why the energy on the Dems side at the moment is very much washing their hands out of this. The Republicans will take the House with an extremely slim majority, so Dems will close rank and force them to vote in unison for every single piece of legislation they want passed, and if they cant muster up the votes for it, too bad.
Republicans have proven that they can't govern, the last 2 years Mike Johnson has been able to hide that by blaming Biden administration. There's no hiding now, let's see how popular they are once the price of eggs doesn't drop. If they get only 219-216, I doubt they can even elect a Speaker.
Energy doesn't have to be positive, you know that right?What energy? Trump gets to replace at least 2 elderly justices/hacks during the next 4 years, cause there is absolutely no way dems take back the senate until 28.
Yes, dems might scrape by the house in 26, hollow victory, it doesn't actually mean anything, republicans take the main price.
Oh and you're funny too. And still don't respond to the content of my message other than what with what you perceive as clever one liners.
Could the data be manipulated by bots or something? Can understand why they've flipped sentiment. Or wishful thinking? Maybe a bit of new found loyalty to the leader?
Energy doesn't have to be positive, you know that right?
Back in 2017 they were angry, Resist Libs and all that, and they tried to mitigate the worst of Trump's policies and negotiated with house Rs when they can. I mean even just 2 years ago they helped Rs elect their Speaker when those dumbfecks couldn't get it done in 2 months, none of that this time.
Obstruction works. Yes, the court is fecked for the forseeable future, but as long as you stay out of the way, Rs will destroy themselves, they can't govern. Let's see how grateful their constituents are whey they tried to cut SS, Medicare, and repeal the ACA. No crossover vote, force them to use every single vote they have on every piece of legislation they want. Then if any succeeds, just claim the credits in your district/state, since facts don't matter nowadays anyway.
Just like GWB got a 'mandate' after 2004 win?They will just blame it on China, transgender people existing, people not having faith in God, deep state, whatever.
I'm being serious, at least in 16 Trump scraped by some fluke electoral win, this time, people really, really wanted him back, he has changed people in a profound way.
Obviously he’s fundamentally changed people. Didn’t a large number of Americans believe that Obama is Muslim or that Hilary runs some sex trafficking operation? The rot of idocity and bigotry is set deep.They will just blame it on China, transgender people existing, people not having faith in God, deep state, whatever.
I'm being serious, at least in 16 Trump scraped by some fluke electoral win, this time, people really, really wanted him back, he has changed people in a profound way.
That’s true as well. While he has fundamentally changed republican base, he also has gotten a similar amount of votes as last time. It’s the democracts who have sunk, which can be put down to their efforts, candidates and strategy and also to the republican machinery of misinformation and hate being more well ingrained and legitimised.Just like GWB got a 'mandate' after 2004 win?
I don't really get this despair. Once CA finish counting he will probably match or be just a smidge over his 2020 number, the story of the election is a lot of libs stayed home and a chunk of previously left leaning people voted for him because of the price of eggs, not 'Trump changed people'. In over
only one country stands for free trade and the neoliberal world order
Obviously he’s fundamentally changed people. Didn’t a large number of Americans believe that Obama is Muslim or that Hilary runs some sex trafficking operation? The rot of idocity and bigotry is set deep.
There is plainly nothing to worry about.
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/11/08/europe/ukraine-trump-elon-musk-zelensky-intl-latam/index.html
Sorry but what is this obsession with wanting to punish China? I would have thought you need to maintain relations and trade with one of the world’s biggest economies ? Can the US even afford deteriorating relations with them?
What happens if Trump’s economical/fiscal policies work and the economy goes well? (As a note, I have no idea if they will work, far from an expert in the topic). Does he get credit, or it will be, ‘it worked despite of him, not because of him’, and ‘it is working only in short term but eventually it is going to crash big time’?
No need to be concerned about that. Trump is the anti-war candidate (elect), remember?So, if a war with Iran kicks off, any talk of shrinking government is off the table. Bottom line: Washington’s “blob” might just spark a war to keep its power and influence intact
No need to be concerned about that. Trump is the anti-war candidate (elect), remember?
It doesn't worry you at all that almost Trump's first act is to include a lunatic businessman in his first post-election conversation with a world leader who is fighting a dangerous megalomaniac like Putin?There’s a lot to be concerned about, though maybe not in the way you’d expect. Trump’s gearing up to slash through Washington’s bureaucracy—what he likes to call the “deep state.” And one way that bureaucracy might fight back? By stirring up war. Not a civil war, mind you, but an international one.
Think about it: the federal government’s current size is mostly thanks to never-ending wars. The main physical impact of WWII here was the Pentagon—the biggest office building in the world. The DHS, is the legacy of 9/11. Wars don’t just expand governments; they shift people’s attitudes, reshape society (usually in terrible ways), and create a climate where people are too scared to question authority because they feel dependent on it.
A lot of money has been funneled toward a potential conflict with Iran this past year—that’s the war the neocons and hawks seem to have their eye on ( “DOJ thwarts Iran plot to kill Trump” story just hit the tape earlier as if on queue ). So, if a war with Iran kicks off, any talk of shrinking government is off the table. Bottom line: Washington’s “blob” might just spark a war to keep its power and influence intact.
P.S. That CNN story? Complete nothing burger. Zelensky’s time is up, and Ukraine’s about to get pulled out of the meat grinder.
Let's hope so
It doesn't worry you at all that almost Trump's first act is to include a lunatic businessman in his first post-election conversation with a world leader who is fighting a dangerous megalomaniac like Putin?
Still an idiot move. A sure sign, as if we need one, of the 4 years of chaos that are to follow.I think Musk's involvement was partly because Trump likes to show off (he does this sort of thing all the time at live events where he randomly asks members of his enterouge to 'say a few words' to the audience. The second reason is because Musk has been sending his Starlink internet terminals to Ukraine since the war began, which has allowed the Ukrainian military to communicate with one another.
It’s a terrific vision too. The guy he’s handing health to seems apt for a tilt focused ship.Good question! If Trump’s policies work and the economy does well, he’ll definitely get credit from his supporters and critics will say it happened despite him or argue it's only a short-term fix that’ll eventually crash. People will spin it to fit their own views, no matter the outcome.
I don’t think he ever expected to win the first time around—it was more like he tripped into defeating Hillary. He didn’t have people lined up to run the show, and even he admitted that, so all sorts of strange characters ended up in key spots, making his first term way more of a circus than it had to be. This time, though (hopefully!), things might be different. He seems more focused, with people on deck who actually share his vision and are on the same page.
Plus, the media never really gave him a chance, throwing everything from the Russia stuff to non-stop bad press his way. And hey, since he’s not running again, maybe folks will dial down the partisanship and try to look at things more objectively this time around.
Is this AI edited video or Trump is really saying this?