The day of the Biden debate, I said in that thread, they need to replace him, even if it's Kamala, and she has a chance if the admin ends one of the two wars. That doesn't mean she brings about a *just* end, but just the appearance of an end to chaos. Because it's not foreign death that bothers American voters (unless it's the death of identified fellow humans like Israelis), it's the perception of chaos, a weak president, and things not in American's control. Biden's strategy of prolonging the war while also leaking how much Bibi was disrespecting him was the worst of all worlds - first, obviously, it kept the war in the news, second, it made him look weak. If they had worked out a plan to kill 500,000 Palestinians within July and then declare the war over, that would have benefited Kamala's campaign (while solidifying Bibi as the greatest PM in Israeli history). Of course, Biden could also end it instantly by withdrawing weapons and diplomatic support, but that is antithetical to Zionist beliefs about Palestinians, and Biden is a sincere lifelong Zionist.
So why am I saying all this in the Trump thread? Because that is exactly the response he is going to get when the Ukraine war ends - on unfavourable terms for Ukraine, but in a favourable PR setting for Trump. That is the response he will get when the IDF completes its liquidation of the remaining ghetto inhabitants in Northern Gaza before February, and the monthly aerial bombings after that drop below the radar. It will mark him as the strong man, whose allies listen to him, and whose enemies fall before him. The narrative "the ME was peaceful and Russia was contained during Trump I" will be reinforced permanently.
And...
Read the replies!