The Trump Presidency - Part 2

Never watched it. Dont all British politicians just sit around sipping scotch and smoking cigars with the occasional yelling at the other side of the room?

Not as exciting as murdering people they don't like.
Then better watch and read again your post after.
 
Let alone have a lunatic like MTG tell them to be scared of anything. I'm hoping that the opposite will happen of what I fear - in that instead of bending over to Donnie and co, they ll draw a very strong line in the sand this time around. They have lost some very strong voices in the Republican establishment however so I'm not very optimistic. And its kind of disturbing me that Im rooting for them in the first place ...but here we are.
The haven't lost much of the old guard in the Senate yet, and most of them won't be concerned about primary challenges, some of Trump's picks are going to find it very difficult to get confirmed, I can't see Gaetz as AG getting thru and RFK might be a stretch as well, of course the recess option will get abused
 
Never watched it. Dont all British politicians just sit around sipping scotch and smoking cigars with the occasional yelling at the other side of the room?

Not as exciting as murdering people they don't like.
Well maybe watch it because it is very good, so good in fact that the US had to make their own version, the majordifferences is that the Brithish know when to stop whilst the Americans work on making as much $$$$ as they can by streyching it out and as a result diminishes it
 
Finally, more Lebensraum on the way




So I'm curious why, since both of you are pretty opposed to Musk, that you give twitter so many links and so much exposure here? Raoul, you could have just linked to the Newsweek article instead of twitter and Berbatrick, I see no value at all in sharing someone talking about what Sarah Palin is sharing on twitter. Of course this doesn't just apply to you both, so its a general question that any prolific twitter sharer can answer but these both stand out the second I logged in.
 
Denmark is going to backup trucks of Lego blocks on our nice American beaches and dump them all out, so we suffer the most serious pain ever when walking on the sand. It isn't worth it Donald, let Denmark have it!
Then you go and also take denmark.
 
Who put this idea in this head? Also who put the idea that it could ever happen in his head?

They'd have to conquer it if they wanted Greenland.
A three way deal between US, China and Russia to get Greenland, Taiwan and Eastern Ukraine. Voted in Security Council where Trump threatens to nuke the UK and France if they veto.

Denmark protests and try to fight back but their state of the art snow guns are not enough of a deterrent. Greenland falls and become the US’ 51st state, but before that, it is renamed to Trumpland.
 
I don't think we (Denmark) even have a right to sell it. It's the people of Greenland who can choose to be under the American wings instead.
 
So I'm curious why, since both of you are pretty opposed to Musk, that you give twitter so many links and so much exposure here? Raoul, you could have just linked to the Newsweek article instead of twitter and Berbatrick, I see no value at all in sharing someone talking about what Sarah Palin is sharing on twitter. Of course this doesn't just apply to you both, so its a general question that any prolific twitter sharer can answer but these both stand out the second I logged in.

i have a twitter account and use it regularly and get a lot of news from it. i was scared for a moment that i was about to get the right-wing algorithm that everyone was complaining about, but so far there's been no change apart from an annoying number of blue-check centrists.

i found this particular thing quite funny.

i don't pay for twitter, its ad revenue is awful, and the company is overall loss-making, so i don't see any ethical issue with using/linking to it.
 
Xi Jin Ping must be laughing his ass off seeing this unfold, at this rate at the end of Trump's 2nd Term China will have overtaken the US in all aspects and be the only adult in the room in term of geopolitical power.
 
Isn't Denmark where the Dutch people live with their pretzels?

To @Red in STL @The Firestarter jokes aside, Ive been meaning to try it still. I do enjoy a lot of British shows. Just dont ask me to acknowledge that too often.
No, the Dutch folks are the Vikings who got tired of raping and pillaging and just retired to use their fingers to plug leaks :)

TBH it probably took me moving to the US to show me how good some of British TV is, there are some good American shows that start off great but then get ruined by overdoing it, they essentially become little more than soap operas
 
Xi Jin Ping must be laughing his ass off seeing this unfold, at this rate at the end of Trump's 2nd Term China will have overtaken the US in all aspects and be the only adult in the room in term of geopolitical power.

Seriously? Seriously?

China, the adult in the room?

I would rather have my entire lifetime of MAGA candidates winning every presidential election from here until 2074 than China gaining more geopolitical relevance.
 
What's anyone going to do? Just go there and take it.

It would be one hell of a way to trigger and test article 5. Without congressional approval to leave NATO, they would probably be treaty bound to impeach the president if he ordered an invasion of Greenland.
 
It would be one hell of a way to trigger and test article 5. Without congressional approval to leave NATO, they would probably be treaty bound to impeach the president if he ordered an invasion of Greenland.
That worked well last time!
 
Seriously? Seriously?

China, the adult in the room?


I would rather have my entire lifetime of MAGA candidates winning every presidential election from here until 2074 than China gaining more geopolitical relevance.
I do think his point is there tho: China gaining more relevance under Trump seems far more likely and at the same time it probably doesn't matter that much either. To the last point: it seems unlikely that China will not overtake the US in some metrics in the not too distant future regardless. No matter what people say or try to do it will happen. Just like how save for mass deporting Hispanics/Latin Americans caucasians will become a minority themselves. And id argue stopping China's rise compared to many other things is hopefully optimistic.

Trump will either undermine our power by breaking with traditional alliances in the Pacific or be so erratic that China will either grow more frustrated or simply take advantage of the instability. This is a guy who often feels like is more interested in writing his name in the history books under as many subsections as possible than having a cohesive plan.
 
I do think his point is there tho: China gaining more relevance under Trump seems far more likely and at the same time it probably doesn't matter that much either. To the last point: it seems unlikely that China will not overtake the US in some metrics in the not too distant future regardless. No matter what people say or try to do it will happen. Just like how save for mass deporting Hispanics/Latin Americans caucasians will become a minority themselves. And id argue stopping China's rise compared to many other things is hopefully optimistic.

Trump will either undermine our power by breaking with traditional alliances in the Pacific or be so erratic that China will either grow more frustrated or simply take advantage of the instability. This is a guy who often feels like is more interested in writing his name in the history books under as many subsections as possible than having a cohesive plan.
That applies as much in Europe as well with Russia and Putin