The Trump Presidency | Biden Inaugurated

Status
Not open for further replies.


:lol: China telling the moron not to back out of the Climate deal. For fecks sake, you couldn't make it up. Really.


Is that real? (I'm genuinely asking because I haven't heard of grist.org before)

If so that shows quite a bit of confidence on the Chinese side. Would be encouraging, given that they still believe in rational reasoning.
 
So it's down to the notion that he is a good orator .How does that explain Trump .

Whatever Trump's appeal, it's not down to his oratory

I think the media have crushed on Obama from day one. He was perfect for them. Black, liberal, with a nice line in high-sounding rhetoric - the embodiment of their vision, or delusion, of what the country might be.

Trump is their worst nightmare taken flesh.:smirk:
 
Is that real? (I'm genuinely asking because I haven't heard of grist.org before)

If so that shows quite a bit of confidence on the Chinese side. Would be encouraging, given that they still believe in rational reasoning.
They are one of the countries suffering the most from CC, so it's not a surprise it's important to them.
 
The only consolation left in all this madness is knowing how stupid these cretins will soon look. But even then they're probably delusional enough to spin it into a positive.

Look at the Brexit thread right now and choose your conclusions...
 
Wow, you don't half-talk shite, do you?

No.

I'm not suggesting that the NYT and other liberal outlets haven't, in carefully measured tones, more in sorrow than in anger, sometimes diverged from Obama and his administration. But comparing his treatment with his conservative predecessors, the difference speaks for itself.

The media is often unable to restrain itself from suggesting that a Republican occupant of the White House is actually evil.
 
The media is often unable to restrain itself from suggesting that a Republican occupant of the White House is actually evil.
Yeah, but the media (there is media other than the New York Times, alas) also regularly said that about Obama, which doesn't really fit with your suggestion that 'he's hardly been criticised in 8 years'.
 
:lol:

I've had to double check the two RDs at times too. But Red Dreams has

his own

peculiar way

of writing

:D
 
Read somewhere that this is the age where people can't decide whether something is right or wrong unless you tell them the name of the political party that said it. Couldn't be more true.
 
No.

I'm not suggesting that the NYT and other liberal outlets haven't, in carefully measured tones, more in sorrow than in anger, sometimes diverged from Obama and his administration. But comparing his treatment with his conservative predecessors, the difference speaks for itself.

The media is often unable to restrain itself from suggesting that a Republican occupant of the White House is actually evil.

With Trump is not exactly a logical leap.
 
Yeah, but the media (there is media other than the New York Times, alas) also regularly said that about Obama, which doesn't really fit with your suggestion that 'he's hardly been criticised in 8 years'.

Yeah, okay. Mea culpa. That 'hardly criticised' thing is not defensible. Of course he's been criticised.

But the tone of coverage is very important in shaping the public's impression of a politician. Even those who know nothing about policy would still form a very favourable impression of Obama from his treatment by the press.
 
Yeah, okay. Mea culpa. That 'hardly criticised' thing is not defensible. Of course he's been criticised.

But the tone of coverage is very important in shaping the public's impression of a politician. Even those who know nothing about policy would still form a very favourable impression of Obama from his treatment by the press.

Going out on a limb here but perhaps the impression a politician leaves with the press is affected by the calibre of the politician himself?
 
Yeah, okay. Mea culpa. That 'hardly criticised' thing is not defensible. Of course he's been criticised.

But the tone of coverage is very important in shaping the public's impression of a politician. Even those who know nothing about policy would still form a very favourable impression of Obama from his treatment by the press.

You can get a favourable impression of Obama from watching Obama.

I agree with your prior point about sometimes a seemingly broad categorization of Republicans as 'the devil', but its not in the mainstream media that I personally find that, rather in opinion pieces.

You might like this from a while back: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-10-11/five-books-to-change-liberals-minds

EDIT, and this: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/08/05/how-paul-krugman-made-donald-trump-possible.html
 
You can get a favourable impression of Obama from watching Obama.

I agree with your prior point about sometimes a seemingly broad categorization of Republicans as 'the devil', but its not in the mainstream media that I personally find that, rather in opinion pieces.

You might like this from a while back: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-10-11/five-books-to-change-liberals-minds

Thanks for the recommendations. Those books sound fascinating and, what's more, I intend to read them!

As someone whose ideas, for better or worse, have always come out of his own head, maybe reading what others have to say about these themes might be educational. :D
 
You can get a favourable impression of Obama from watching Obama.

I agree with your prior point about sometimes a seemingly broad categorization of Republicans as 'the devil', but its not in the mainstream media that I personally find that, rather in opinion pieces.

You might like this from a while back: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-10-11/five-books-to-change-liberals-minds

EDIT, and this: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/08/05/how-paul-krugman-made-donald-trump-possible.html

Scalia wrote a book? I'll have to read that, just because it's him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.