Oh I would so love this to be true.The Trump Presidency | Biden Inaugurated
- Thread starter Raoul
- Start date
- Status
Oh I would so love this to be true.Tbf to Trump - the approval for the flights was given in December.
No, I get that, but I don't see why he'd revoke something that is beneficial to both countries, really. Wasn't approval given before he took office anyway?
He has revoked green cards, environmental protection laws and transgender rights. Why wouldn't he?
I understand it very well. Is being terrified that some kid with mental problems will take his parents ( or in Lanzas case his ) automatic weapon will come to my kids school and massacre as many as possible. Or do you have to have brown skin and a Muslim name to be classed as a terrorist. Back to you're bag of coke son.
But you stated it as if he rejected it as some sort of 'false promise' to Americans.
Very good. Hypocrisy laid bare.He's supposedly a protectionist. Why isn't he listening to his own airlines and unions, who say it's going to damage them? He got on the backs of an air conditioner company on a whim, why not here? Is losing jobs to a Norwegian company more acceptable than to Mexico?
Terrorism is directly linked to political activism, being afraid of random and avoidable violence isn't being victim of terrorism.
Edit: You are frightened by the context, not threatened by it.
Being terrified of something doesn't make it terrorism, so, no, you don't appear to understand it very well.
To be fair, Rams doesn't seem to have a firm grasp on the meaning of national security either.
yeah, he is just going to do every little thing his unions tell him to, blindly. Come on.
Nope, I won't come on. He picked on an air conditioner company in Indiana - there were unions involved there. And it's not just the unions, it's the airlines too. He's proven he's petty enough to act in this case and he constantly spouts about protecting American jobs.
So walking through a school shooting people is not terrorism but walking through a convention center is. If you are an expert go on, educate me.
If both are the fruit of a political revendication, they are both terrorism otherwise neither are.
So shooting fifty people in a gay club because of a hatred of you're sexuality is not terrorism but if I shout ISIS its terrorism. I'm not having that. What if someone shoots up an Exxon gas station because they believe they are ruining the environment, is that terrorism?
I think Tillerson and Mattis have been traveling for much of their time and Tillerson hasn't been doing any press, on top of which, the State Department don't seem to have hired a spokesperson yet. In fact, a vast majority of executive agency political appointments have yet to be filled.
So if a conspiracy nut like Holmes who shot up the movie theatre in Aurora, terrorism or not.
For the Exxon part, yes it is terrorism. Otherwise mass murder isn't necessarily Terrorism, you need a political motive.
If there was one senator I hoped got it good it was Tom Cotton.
Why the heck are you guys discussing the semantics of "terrorism" when the actual point in the first place was that you're more likely to get shot up by an American (without any affiliation to Islam) than a muslim?
Feck, I know he enjoys a sniff here and there but I didn't realise he's actually turned in to a bag of Charlie. LOL Sorry couldn't resist.
Thanks for this
Took me a while to find this. Hope it helps.
You also don't need to act to be a terrorist, threatening is enough.
I understand the definition of terrorism as in for a political purpose but it doesn't sit right with me. Dylan Roof is by definition a terrorist, Lanza not so much, but it takes the same cold heart and indifference to human life to do what they done. If you can kill everyone in the room should a political motive define how we characterize the act.
Good point, JP. That is correct.
It doesn't sit right because you are trying to create a moral hierarchy that doesn't exist. A mass murder is as bad as a terrorist activist. The distinction is only important for the context of a conversation, it can be important to acknowledge the political motives.
Helps a lot buddy, thank you.Took me a while to find this. Hope it helps.
My predictive text is a help and a hindrance. Makes me smart and stupid at the same time.
Lucky boy, with the rugrats around me 24/7 I'm more of a crust stuck in the middle of the 0 on my bank card.
It's important for us as commentators to get the words right, otherwise we risk falling into the world of fake news, subversive agendas, etc.
Mine appears to have been programmed by a retarded donkey, whose first language was not English.
I am not sure, that Trump wants to get rid of the ACA. The republicans certainly want to and any republican primary candidate has to repeat this promise a couple of times or they’d get slaughtered. Opposition by the GOP against the ACA was primarily motivated by strategical motivations. They thought that this is the best way to obstruct and oppose Obama’s administration. Now they backed themselves into a corner, because they have to follow their own nonsense.
Here is an extremely long read (8 articles in total) from someone who hates the ACA. I don’t share is opinion or conclusion, but most of his points are still worth considering.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/michael...stupidity-of-the-american-voter/#181929d32e6a
Milo was going to speak until 2 days ago...Bannon will speak...Breitbart is a sponsor. Yet, he's out there paying lip service when it comes to the Neo - Nazis
If white supremacists aren't right wing enough, what the feck is?
It's a question I'd be very interested in an answer to. What health insurance do senators have?
- Status